Brilliant news. Well done everyone!
On 20 March 2013 18:41, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> A quick update... the board has *passed* our graduation resolution. We
> are now a TLP. Congratulations! Awesome work everyone!
>
> We are going to have to work through some infra related changes b
John
>
> On Mar 14, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > (Sorry, and yes, moderation only. Thanks. I'll put you down as a mod.)
> >
> >
> > On 14 March 2013 17:12, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013, at 09:22 AM, Noa
(Sorry, and yes, moderation only. Thanks. I'll put you down as a mod.)
On 14 March 2013 17:12, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013, at 09:22 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Dear community,
> >
> > I would like to establish the cloudstack-announce mailing list.
&
Joe,
It would be for release announcements and security announcements only.
The meet-ups/events thing is another problem... ;)
On 14 March 2013 17:12, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013, at 09:22 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Dear community,
> >
> > I would
Daniel Shahaf asks us if we plan to make a release before graduation. If
yes, I suspect we ought to create this now. If not, let's wait.
On 14 March 2013 14:34, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:27
P.S. Thanks, David!
On 14 March 2013 14:24, David Nalley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Dear community,
> >
> > I would like to establish the cloudstack-announce mailing list.
> >
> > The primary purpose of this mai
We're gonna have to do that anyway, and I believe the process is automated.
So why wait?
On 14 March 2013 14:26, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:24:13AM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Noah Slater
> wrote:
> > > Dea
Dear community,
I would like to establish the cloudstack-announce mailing list.
The primary purpose of this mailing list will be to post release
announcements to.
It is important that we provide high signal channels through which people
can discover project status.
I have two use cases in mind.
Firstly, I'd say the PPMC members should really be subscribed to the
marketing list. But that's just my opinion. I don't see how you can do
project oversight if you're not actually overseeing the lists. RoyF would
disagree with me probably. He doesn't even subscribe to user@httpd. So
whatever.
I d
Exciting times!
On 14 March 2013 00:46, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I wanted to share status and next steps on our road to graduation.
>
> Our Vote:
>
> I'll be able to close the graduation VOTE on time tomorrow (72 hours).
> Right now, I'm assuming that we pass the vote. We currently
+1
On 11 March 2013 16:42, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to invite the CloudStack community to vote on whether
> Apache CloudStack is ready to graduate to top-level project status. The
> result of this vote will demonstrate whether the community is willing to
> govern itself (whic
Devs,
I was just reading through the by-laws we voted in (sorry, I am about a
month late in doing this, I know) and it occurred to me that we might have
the wrong definition of lazy consensus.
Specifically, we define it here:
"3.2.1. Lazy Consensus - Lazy consensus requires 3 binding +1 votes an
Okay, thanks. :)
On 26 February 2013 05:51, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013, at 01:07 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Any plans to send a version of the weekly news to user/dev MLs? (Instead
> > of
> > just a link or whatever.)
>
> None on my end. I'd
with review board as well.
> >
> > When a patch is applied, comments gets in JIRA and review gets shipped
> and
> > submitted ?
> >
> >
> > On Mar 6, 2013, at 6:07 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >
> > > Nope! I meant this for CloudStack. I ju
Nope! I meant this for CloudStack. I just used a CouchDB ticket as a demo!
I think this may be old news for you guys though...
On 6 March 2013 22:59, Chip Childers wrote:
> Did you mean this for couchdb?
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Devs,
&
Devs,
We have GIT & JIRA integration.
When making a checkin, simply mention any tickets by ticket number. The
checking will generate a comment on the tickets you mention.
Here's an example:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1418
I'm going to ask Infra if they can let us close ticke
The link for filing bugs is:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
On 6 March 2013 15:26, Isaac Chiang wrote:
> Hi all:
> When I looked up for deleteUser command on the website, I found
> that both description
> and response format are wrong.
>
>
> http://incubator.apache.o
Community guidelines, if adopted by the majority, become self-sustaining.
So they will enforce themselves.
On 5 March 2013 09:46, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:16:36AM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> >>
> >
Looks good Chip.
On 1 March 2013 18:30, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Just wanted to point out that I've updated our status file for the IPMC
> [1] to include some missing (new) committers and PPMC members. I also
> added all of our IPMC/Board report submissions that were missing. Last
>
+1
On 1 March 2013 16:16, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As previously discussed [1], we'd like to make a change to our bylaws
> [2] to modify the method of selecting a PMC chair. We also want to add
> a term for the chair.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ifwwce657u36yuwz
> [2]
> https
Grats!
On 1 March 2013 17:27, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Marcus to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to announce
> that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Marcus!
> (and apo
Grats!
On 1 March 2013 22:13, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Sebastien to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
> announce
> that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Sebastien!
>
Grats!
On 27 February 2013 15:53, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Noa Resare to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that
> he has accepted.
>
> Being a committer enables easier contributio
I thought the mascot was called CloudMonkey? Perhaps we changed that and I
missed the thread. :)
I am not sure we *have* to assert a trademark on anything. Where does "Open
Source Cloud Computing" appear and why would we want to trademark it?
On 26 February 2013 23:21, Mathias Mullins wrote:
>
The functions and responsibilities of a committer are up to each project.
Typically, they are expected to have more scope for managing JIRA, the
wiki, moderating mailing lists, social media, etc.
On 27 February 2013 01:18, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Sebastien Goa
Grats.
On 26 February 2013 21:57, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
> Hi folks:
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Radhika Puthiyetath to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that she has accepted.
>
> Being a committer enables easier contr
Congrats.
On 27 February 2013 02:15, Alex Huang wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
> asked Sateesh Chodapuneedi to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
>
>
> Being a committer enables easier contribution t
Hi devs,
Looks like we're the most active Apache project, according to Ohloh!
https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/apache/projects
Though, we still need to work on the "I Use This" metric...
Early days! :D
Best,
--
NS
Any plans to send a version of the weekly news to user/dev MLs? (Instead of
just a link or whatever.)
On 25 February 2013 18:41, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Just a reminder - if you have any snippets to add to the Weekly News,
> I'll be wrapping it up tonight and posting it to the blog
Comittership is a bestowal of trust on an individual on behalf of the
project. It is awarded to people who have shown sustained positive
contributions to the project, code or no code. Don't get too hung up on the
code aspect.
On 22 February 2013 22:30, Jessica Tomechak wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2
Looks good. I have signed off.
On 10 January 2013 19:57, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Based on a discussion on -private raised by Noah, I've added a graf to
> the board report as follows:
>
> How has the community developed since the last report?
>
> We have noticed a trend of features for CloudSt
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has
asked Joe to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to announce
that he has accepted.
Please join me in congratulating Joe!
Regards,
Noah
on behalf of the CloudStack PPMC
Congrats!
On 11 December 2012 19:19, Alex Huang wrote:
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Min Chen to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
> projec
doubt they will. All committers should be able to request access.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/Infra
On 12 October 2012 16:22, David Nalley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have been set up as an administrator of our blog.
age
> 3. Add note in about us page: http://www.cloudstack-china.org/about-us
>
> Please let me know if it's ok. If there are further discussions, I
> wish we can start a new thread.
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > I should have l
You should bring this up on infrastruct...@apache.org, and they should be
able to let you know what the current status of this work is. I know other
people, including myself, have asked for this feature. It would be very
beneficial.
On 5 November 2012 06:41, Pradeep Soundararajan <
pradeep.sounda
P.S. I would caveat that personally identifying information about our users
should obviously not be shared. ;)
On 14 November 2012 15:25, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 03:38:06PM +0100, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> > I don't know what type of data you will get with Pwiki. But t
This proposal has me confused.
Why would any data at all be considered private? And private to whom?
There is no "us" and "them" in this project. We are one community. The only
thing that separates the PMC and committers from any other subscribers to
this list is a little bit more trust to undert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-570?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noah Slater closed CLOUDSTACK-570.
--
Resolution: Invalid
This isn't a valid ticket. Please ask your question on the approp
Congrats, and welcome!
--
NS
This is a great thing to share with the list! If you subscribe to
pr...@apache.org, we have some press monitoring stuff set up. You might be
able to gleen some information from there too. Sally is also a great help
with PR/AR stuff.
On 8 November 2012 04:44, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
Congratulations!
On 26 November 2012 19:49, David Nalley wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Hugo to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
> announce that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Hugo,
>
> --David
>
Late to the party here folks, and this may have been covered in one of the
other threads about releasing. Automation is great. But all we can automate
is the preparation of release candidates. But the voting will always be
manual, and will always take 72 hours or more.
So the question shifts to: h
As part of the CouchDB release procedure, we have:
- If the currently released version is 0.1.0, JIRA should have options
for 0.1.1, 0.2.0, and 0.3.0.
- The released version should be marked as released in JIRA.
- Archived releases should be marked as archived.
- Every current relea
s [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2012 9:32 AM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] Proposed schedule for our next release
> >
> > On Nov 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> >
> > > On 2 November 2012 03:07, Chip Chi
On 1 November 2012 13:35, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Woot, fscking awesome. Thanks for this Chip.
> >
> > Two minor nitpicks for the next VOTE we do. Individual votes should
> include
> > a link next to them to
D'oh! Heh. Thanks.
On 3 November 2012 16:32, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Nov 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > On 2 November 2012 03:07, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >
> >> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2
Thanks for bringing this to the list, Joe. I am happy to own my
suggestions, so I'll state publicly that I brought this up during the
meeting.
My idea is centred around using the blog as a content marketing platform.
cf. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Content_marketing
"Content marketing is an umb
+1 on semver. The important thing for people to realise with semver is that
you bump the major number *every time you break backwards incompatibility*.
Not just when you think you've added something "reasonably large". Big, big
difference. And totally sensible.
Also, you mention cutting the releas
On 2 November 2012 03:07, Chip Childers wrote:
> First, note the subject tag of "[ASFCS41]". I'm making 2 assumptions
> right now. First, that we should adopt semantic versioning for our
> versioning scheme. Second, that our next feature release will be
> backward compatible with 4.0.0-incubat
Stack 4.0.0-incubating
> >> To: gene...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.0.0-incubating *passes* with
> >> 5 IPMC +1 votes.
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >> * Jim Jagielski
> >>
---
>
> +1 PPMC / IPMC votes (binding)
> * David Nalley
> * Wido den Hollander
> * Edison Su
> * Will Chan
> * Kevin Kluge
> * Alex Huang
> * Jim Jagielski (mentor)
> * Olivier Lamy (mentor)
> * Brett Porter (mentor)
> * Daniel Kulp (m
Grats! Welcome to the team!
On 30 October 2012 13:41, Chip Childers wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Alex to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
> announce that he has accepted.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Alex!
>
>
Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Chip Childers
> > wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Noah Slater
> wrote:
> >>> Actually, sorry, I probably gave that +1 a *lit
Alex, do you know enough to fix those instructions?
On 30 October 2012 01:01, Alex Huang wrote:
> +1 Sorry for being late because I've been tied up in other stuff and
> because the instruction doesn't work on windows (yeah yeah windows
> wmindows). But I finally gave it a quick test and it work
please let
> us know.
>
> Jessica
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Noah Slater [mailto:nsla...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 8:42 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
>
On 29 October 2012 00:13, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > It is frustrating because everything is so slow, and my (main) computer
> is
> > practically unusable while it is running. How feasible would it be to
> > provide t
IP clearance is for anything that was developed outside of the foundation,
even if it was developed by people with ICLAs on file.
I am looking for Shane's guidance on this.
On 29 October 2012 13:21, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > I
It's been three days and it looks like we have unanimous consensus.
The next steps are to do IP clearence. I am happy to work with someone from
Citrix on this. We'll need to establish what rights Citrix holds, and then
transfer these to the ASF. At that point, we can import the source files,
and s
Actually, sorry, I probably gave that +1 a *little* too soon.
Can someone make the case for "waf" not being a release blocker?
Everything else can probably slide.
On 28 October 2012 17:51, Noah Slater wrote:
> It is frustrating because everything is so slow, and my (main
L license headers
Thanks!
On 28 October 2012 17:00, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2012, at 5:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > I was expecting a VM for the storage thing. But that never appeared. I
> did
> > see a line for the VM I created. Either way, this te
The test procedure needs to mention this.
On 25 October 2012 15:19, sebgoa wrote:
> Hi Brett,
>
> My experience is that the tinyLinux template shows up once the systemVMs
> are in 'running' state.
> If you go too fast, you can end up not seeing the template...indeed.
>
> -Sebastien
>
> On Oct 25
unable to complete the configuration change step. I am close to giving
up. This has been an incredibly frustrating experience.
On 28 October 2012 16:45, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2012, at 4:41 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Okay,
> >
> > I did a rebuild a
The wiki seems like a prime location for any KB like effort, if we wanted
to maintain/archive it.
On 24 October 2012 22:18, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:58 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > During todays meeting the content (KB articles, design documents, etc)
>
ld (start with "ant clean-all build-all")?
>
> - chip
>
> Sent from my iPhone.
>
> On Oct 27, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > I doubt it. Looks like part of the application code.
> >
> > My real problem is that I am unable to complete this step, a
+1 on the monkey, and +1 on the chaos monkey features ;)
On 26 October 2012 17:11, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Is it bad that the first thing I thought of when I read the subject
> was the Netflix Chaos Monkey? I thought this was going to be about
> adopting fault testing features into CloudStack.
Perhaps bug the Infra people about it. They may know a good way.
On 26 October 2012 21:10, Alex Huang wrote:
> I know we can do advanced search but is there a way to make that search
> box automatically limited to CloudStack when you're on the cloudstack wiki?
> Or can our wiki provide a CloudS
Chip,
I think this is a great initiative. Do you have plans for any sort of
roadmap process?
Would be interesting in hearing you thoughts on how we do something like
that.
Thanks,
On 24 October 2012 22:56, Chip Childers wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Obviously we still have to actually pass a vote, and
>
> On Oct 27, 2012, at 1:28 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Sig: OK
> > Hashes: OK
> > Source checks: OK
> > RAT: OK
> > Build: OK
> >
> > However, during this:
> >
> > mvn -P deps
> >
> > I noticed line like this:
> &
Sig: OK
Hashes: OK
Source checks: OK
RAT: OK
Build: OK
However, during this:
mvn -P deps
I noticed line like this:
[INFO] Installing
> /private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/pom.xml to
> /Users/nslater/.m2/repository/org/apache/cloudstack/cloudstack/4.0.0-incubating-SNAP
Huh, interesting. The SVN approach is new to me. I will update CouchDB's
release procedure. Thanks Olivier.
On 25 October 2012 20:39, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >> 2012/10/25 Chip Childers :
> >>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2
> Thanks for reminding me about the policy issue. From my understanding,
> there're 2 issues:
> 1. the feather logo of Apache is used
> 2. The word "Apache" is used
>
> Please correct me if I miss anything. I'll do the modification after
> your confi
> Thanks for reminding me about the policy issue. From my understanding,
> there're 2 issues:
> 1. the feather logo of Apache is used
> 2. The word "Apache" is used
>
> Please correct me if I miss anything. I'll do the modification after
> your confi
t the policy issue. From my understanding,
> there're 2 issues:
> 1. the feather logo of Apache is used
> 2. The word "Apache" is used
>
> Please correct me if I miss anything. I'll do the modification after
> your confirmation.
>
> Thanks
> Gavin
>
&g
Did we get anywhere with this? Do we still consider it a 4.0 blocker?
On 3 October 2012 18:26, Chip Childers wrote:
> All,
>
> I'd like to propose that Citrix (if willing) redirect cloudstack.org
> to http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/ and docs.cloudstack.org to
> the appropriate sub-page o
Gavin,
It's great that you're maintaining this!
Could I ask you to take a look at our policy on domain names and third
party branding:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/domains.html
>From a quick look at your site (and not knowing Chinese) I would say that
there's some potential scope for
On 20 October 2012 22:17, David Nalley wrote:
> Following up to this thread:
>
> > Some ways in which the current CloudStack account on GitHub are
> problematic:
> >
> >- CloudStack is used as the account name, in both the URL and the UI
>
> I attempted to solve this with cloudstack-extras -
/www.apache.org/**foundation/marks/domains.html<http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/domains.html>
>
> (Note, the domain name policy is actually about domain.names, not /paths,
> however it has the clearest set of rules & rationales)
>
> Make sense?
>
> - Shane
>
&g
This is a great example of why we need to be super careful about our brand
and our messaging.
The old JIRA concerns me. I know we've talked about this before, but I do
not recall any definitive plans for it. It would be best if we could shut
it down, and migrate everything across to our current JI
On 19 October 2012 19:25, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> project = CloudStack AND type = Bug AND status != Closed AND component
> = Doc ORDER BY priority DESC, key DESC
>
Chip, give me a shout if you want the ability to create shared filters.
--
NS
Sweet!
On 22 October 2012 16:21, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following bugs (docs) are currently blocking another round of
> > voting. Perhaps we can work these out tomorrow? I'd like to kick off
> > the third round o
f I am doing would happen anyway.
Sorry if I've caused frustration, again. I can understand why you would
feel frustrated. That was not my intention.
On 20 October 2012 21:43, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > On 20 October 2012 18:10,
On 20 October 2012 18:10, David Nalley wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Hmm, "cloudstack-extras" seems to me like something that the Apache
> > CloudStack project is providing. I was hoping for Shane's input on this,
> > whic
t; Belated +1 for the move. Thanks for doing it.
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:22 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> > This has sat for almost a week with no additional comments - I'll
> > assume lazy consensus and make this change.
> >
> > --David
> >
> > O
Danke!
On 17 October 2012 17:28, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Ah, sorry, a separate repo makes much more sense. :)
> >
> > However, the only thing I have to say about this with my mentor hat on is
> > that if we
2012 at 12:05 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for
> > eventually, or is it fine where it is?
> >
> > It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too
> > then?
>
>
> It mi
Interesting. Is it something we'd want to create a sub-project for
eventually, or is it fine where it is?
It might be a good idea to copy a DISCLAIMER file into this package too
then?
On 17 October 2012 16:56, David Nalley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
17, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> > On 17 October 2012 13:56, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > ALtools/marvin/CHANGES.txt
> >> > N tools/marvin/LICENSE.txt
> >> > ALtools/marvin/MANIFEST.in
> >&
On 17 October 2012 13:56, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > ALtools/marvin/CHANGES.txt
> > N tools/marvin/LICENSE.txt
> > ALtools/marvin/MANIFEST.in
>
> Marvin is a stand-alone tool really. That's why they are there.
Can you clarify what you mean? I can't find this license in the ro
one
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> On Oct 16, 2012, at 9:15 AM, "Rohit Yadav"
> >> >>
> >> >> > >> wrote:
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> > Another issue I
I just tried to clean the source locally and redeploy and get the same
error.
Chip, can you advise please?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> I am following the instructions from the wiki, copy and paste style.
>
> This is the FIRST time the rdeploy thing managed to
I am following the instructions from the wiki, copy and paste style.
This is the FIRST time the rdeploy thing managed to SSH into the VM.
Do these comments still apply? (Should we document them?)
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> On 16-Oct-2012, at 5:48 PM, Noah
.xml:94:
Remote command failed with exit status 1
Total time: 55 seconds
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Thanks, downloading the binary distribution of Ant and manually copying
> ant-jsch.jar worked for me. I have updated the wiki.
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012
t; with updated versions..
>
> On Oct 16, 2012, at 1:48 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > $ ls -l /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 226175 15 Oct 20:10
> > /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
>
--
NS
$ ls -l /usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 226175 15 Oct 20:10
/usr/share/ant/lib/jsch-0.1.48.jar
--
NS
I am running into an error, and would appreciate guidance.
$ ant rdeploy
Buildfile:
/private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build.xml
[echo] Using build parameters from
/private/tmp/cloudstack/apache-cloudstack-4.0.0-incubating-src/build/build-cloud.properties
[ech
+1 to what David said. The best response to most FUD is to a) ignore it,
and b) double down on our efforts to make CloudStack rock. Bring on new
committers, add more features, ship more software.
If there is ever the need to clarify something, it should be done on these
lists, to our users. We hav
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> > Might be good to indicate the provenance of this image on the wiki, and
> > perhaps move it somewhere not on cloud.com, or am I misunderstanding
> what
> > that communicates?
>
> I think moving it's build process to an automated approach,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> So if I was in your shoes, I wouldn't abstain from voting.
+1
I agree with everything Chip said.
QA testing is superb, and it's so great that we're doing it. But releasing
testing is something else, that is hopefully enough for everyone
>>> I
> >>>> left in the default comment message as well, simply because it
> >>>> includes a list of what's modified,etc for reference when typing up
> >>>> the notes.
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Rohit
> >>>
1 - 100 of 347 matches
Mail list logo
