The wiki seems like a prime location for any KB like effort, if we wanted to maintain/archive it.
On 24 October 2012 22:18, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:58 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > During todays meeting the content (KB articles, design documents, etc) > > currently living on docs.cs.o came up. The big questions are: > > > > What do we do with the existing content? > > How do we ensure that it is maintained? > > Who is going to do the work? > > > > Answers welcome :) > > > > --David > > > > My 2 cents: > > Primary docs should already be on our new site. > FAQ and Glossary should be pages on the site. > Cloudbridge docs should have been integrated into the CS docs > > I think that leaves the KB articles... which I'm not sure about how > to handle. First, several that I found are for versions that aren't > apache versions of the software (i.e.: specific to older stuff). I'm > also not sure that we really need a KB as a project... but I'm open > to arguments on that front. As a project, we *could* do the KB > thing... but stuff goes stale very fast IMO. > > Personally, I'd be happy if the KB ended up being a commercial support > thing for CTX, and the project focused on keeping the primary docs in > order. > > -chip > -- NS
