Hi Frank
If the storage network is for Secondary Storage, why does the admin guide
contain the following
"For the separate storage network to work correctly, it must be the only
interface that can ping the primary storage device's IP address. For example,
if eth0 is the management network NIC,
Hi
I have been trying to get a system up and running using XenServer 6.0.2 with
multiple physical networks, with one nic dedicated to Storage.
There seems to be a lot of contradictory info regarding the use of the storage
network, and whether it is for Primary or Secondary storage.
The latest
I agree with John re the number of clicks required to get to things, it's gets
very tiring.
Geoff
On 6 Jun 2012, at 19:44, "John Kinsella" wrote:
My US$0.02:
The animations look nice - especially when I was new to the product. When
actually trying to get things done, though, they just slo
na-exec-2:null) Cannot delete pool san-p1n1c1.iedc.cloud.tls.net as
> there are associated vols for this pool
> 2012-05-16 09:58:53,601 WARN [cloud.api.ApiDispatcher]
> (catalina-exec-2:null) class com.cloud.api.ServerApiException : Failed to
> delete storage pool
>
> I su
and want to be über safe
(my preferred stance) then copy the VHDs off first, you can always re-import
them back into CloudStack via Templates if you have to, but I assume as there
are no clients on this system yet the LUNs should be empty.
Kind Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Senior
.
Kind Regards
Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Senior Consultant
ShapeBlue Ltd
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
On 14 May 2012, at 21:49, "Geoff Higginbottom"
wrote:
I had assumed you had Primary and
er to simply drop the DB
Schema, and recreate it from scratch, or create a new Zone and let the wizard
take care of everything.
On 14 May 2012, at 21:12, "Matthew Hartmann" wrote:
On 5/14/2012 3:35 PM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> If I understand correctly, your s
: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two Issues with XenServer 6.0.2 and CS 3.0.1
Please see my responses inline, below:
On 5/14/2012 3:18 PM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> It looks like you have forgot to label your physical networks and map them
> within th
Matthew,
It looks like you have forgot to label your physical networks and map them
within the Zone Setup process, this is vital if you want to use dedicated NICs
for any of the four network types, ie Management, Guest, Public or Storage.
Re the Cloud Supplemental Pack, this is only required if
My concern here is that the roadmap has lots of new features, and we do not
want to be waiting 6 months for the next release which was due out in May
Geoff
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: 14 May 2012 20:07
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject
I have had to revert to manipulating things in the database on more than one
occasion, but only on test and POC systems, you should not go near it on a live
system
-Original Message-
From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
Sent: 14 May 2012 18:58
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.ap
11 matches
Mail list logo