I had assumed you had Primary and Secondary storage on different IP ranges to 
your Management Server which does need to be able to access Secondary Storage 
but not Primary Storage.

I now note your Primary Storage is iSCSI, and that you had a failure of all 
Hosts.

When adding Storage and Hosts, you have to add Hosts, before you add Primary 
Storage, and you have to add Primary Storage before Secondary Storage.

This is all taken care of by the Add Zone Wizard, but if you have a failure of 
all Hosts in a Zone then you need to remove both Primary and Secondary Storage, 
then add a Host, then add Primary Storage, then add Secondary storage.

Templates, ISOs etc that are on Secondary will disappear from the GUI, but 
don't worry, they will be detected by the SSVM once it comes online, and they 
will then reappear in the GUI.

If this is a simple test system then it may be easier to simply drop the DB 
Schema, and recreate it from scratch, or create a new Zone and let the wizard 
take care of everything.


On 14 May 2012, at 21:12, "Matthew Hartmann" <mhartm...@tls.net> wrote:


On 5/14/2012 3:35 PM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> If I understand correctly, your storage is on a different IP Range to your 
> Management Server and Hosts etc, if this is the case you need a Storage 
> Network, which also needs to be accessible from the Management Server.  If no 
> Storage Network is configured, CloudStack will use the Management Network 
> when trying to access Storage.

Odd, did something change? The Management Server has never needed to access the 
storage network before. I have tried using XenServer name labels for the 
Storage Network, but to no avail. Why would the Management Server need to 
access my iSCSI SAN (Primary Storage)? I have confirmed my my Management Server 
can still access Secondary Storage (NFS Server). All devices have an FQDN which 
can be resolved from the XenServer and Management Server.

>
> Re http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14655 this is only required if you 
> are using NIC Bonding and I do not believe you are

Yes, we are using bonding but we are not using CSP. The bug report refers to 
bonding and XenServer 6.0.x but it is not clear whether the steps outlined 
should be taken regardless of whether or not CSP is being used in ones setup.

Cheers,

Matthew

>
> Regards
>
> Geoff
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartm...@tls.net]
> Sent: 14 May 2012 20:27
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Two Issues with XenServer 6.0.2 and CS 3.0.1
>
> Please see my responses inline, below:
>
> On 5/14/2012 3:18 PM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
>> Matthew,
>>
>> It looks like you have forgot to label your physical networks and map them 
>> within the Zone Setup process, this is vital if you want to use dedicated 
>> NICs for any of the four network types, ie Management, Guest, Public or 
>> Storage.
> This was a pre-existing zone that was operating well. The XenServer pool 
> freaked out and unraveled quicker than the fall of Rome. I performed a clean 
> install on my XenServer's and am simply trying to re-add them back into the 
> Pod. I'm only using one Node at this moment just so I can get things going. 
> When I initially setup my XenServer's and the pool, I made copious note 
> should something like this happen. Now that it has unfortunately happened, 
> configuring my XenServer's the same as they were initially when everything 
> was functional doesn't seem to have helped.
>
>> Re the Cloud Supplemental Pack, this is only required if you are using
>> Security Groups with a  Basic Zone
> Right, but is the patch required regardless of whether or not CSP is 
> installed? I have experienced a similar issue and I am *not* using CSP.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Matthew Hartmann [mailto:mhartm...@tls.net]
>> Sent: 14 May 2012 19:42
>> To: CloudStack user/admin discussions
>> Cc: CloudStack Devs
>> Subject: Fwd: Two Issues with XenServer 6.0.2 and CS 3.0.1
>>
>>
>> I forgot to include the following information that I found in the database 
>> after the host was added:
>>
>> mysql>   select * from host where id=22 \G;
>> [...]
>> private_ip_address: 10.0.0.16
>> private_netmask: 255.255.254.0
>> private_mac_address: e8:9a:8f:22:9b:c4
>> storage_ip_address: 10.0.0.16
>> storage_netmask: 255.255.254.0
>> storage_mac_address: e8:9a:8f:22:9b:c4
>> storage_ip_address_2: 10.0.0.16
>> storage_mac_address_2: e8:9a:8f:22:9b:c4
>> storage_netmask_2: 255.255.254.0
>> [...]
>>
>> That information is incorrect, as the storage_ip_address and
>> storage_ip_address_2 are two completely different subnets and CloudStack 
>> does not see these network devices.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject:        Two Issues with XenServer 6.0.2 and CS 3.0.1
>> Date:   Mon, 14 May 2012 14:36:57 -0400
>> From:   Matthew Hartmann<mhartm...@tls.net>
>> Organization:   TLS.NET, Inc.
>> To:     CloudStack user/admin discussions
>> <cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org>
>> CC:     CloudStack Devs<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> First of all, it is not very clear whether or not this patch is required for 
>> XenServer with regard to the Cloud Supplemental Pack:
>> http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14655
>>
>> Could someone shed some light on this?
>>
>> Secondly, I'm having an issue with CloudStack trying to use my 
>> "cloud-private" network for Public, Guest, Management and Storage.
>>
>> Here is what my CS 3.0.1 Management Server log is showing:
>>
>> [java] INFO [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (http-8080-6:) Private
>> Network is cloud-private for host 10.0.0.16 [java] INFO
>> [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (http-8080-6:) Guest Network is
>> cloud-private for host 10.0.0.16 [java] INFO
>> [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (http-8080-6:) Public Network is
>> cloud-private for host 10.0.0.16 [java] INFO
>> [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (http-8080-6:) Storage Network 1 is
>> cloud-private for host 10.0.0.16 [java] INFO
>> [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (http-8080-6:) Storage Network 2 is
>> cloud-private for host 10.0.0.16
>>
>> On my XenServer 6.0.2 machine I have my "cloud-private" and "cloud-public" 
>> networks. In CS, I have my Storage network set to "Use default gateway". The 
>> XenServer has access to the Internet and can resolve the FQDN of all hosts, 
>> management servers and the SAN on the storage network. I can ping the IP's 
>> of the SAN on both Storage subnets, yet CloudStack reports after adding the 
>> host that it can't see the storage network; obviously because it is 
>> incorrectly discovering my networks.
>>
>> I have verified in the config in my database for my networks:
>>
>> mysql>   select * from physical_network_traffic_types;
>> +----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+--------------+-------------------+-------------------+----------------------+-------------------------+-------------------+------+
>> | id | uuid                                 | physical_network_id |
>> traffic_type | xen_network_label | kvm_network_label |
>> vmware_network_label | simulator_network_label | ovm_network_label |
>> vlan |
>> +----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+--------------+-------------------+-------------------+----------------------+-------------------------+-------------------+------+
>> |  1 | 3a368a1d-5d33-4e11-80ea-02da222d3930 |                   1 |
>> Management   | cloud-private     | NULL              |
>> NULL                 | NULL                    | NULL              | NULL |
>> |  2 | 3bf7b069-355e-4171-8ac5-c6f84777fc9d |                   2 |
>> Guest        | cloud-public      | NULL              |
>> NULL                 | NULL                    | NULL              | NULL |
>> |  3 | bb19c965-d726-451e-98fe-e0363c3bbd19 |                   2 |
>> Public       | cloud-public      | NULL              |
>> NULL                 | NULL                    | NULL              | NULL |
>> |  4 | 9df97cc6-f4e6-4d5f-b148-99f0dfc64dac |                   1 |
>> Storage      | NULL              | NULL              |
>> NULL                 | NULL                    | NULL              | NULL |
>> +----+--------------------------------------+---------------------+--------------+-------------------+-------------------+----------------------+-------------------------+-------------------+------+
>> 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)
>>
>> Thoughts? Any assistance would be greatly appreciated!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>>
>> ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting services to 
>> help IT Service Providers and enterprises to build a true IaaS compute 
>> cloud. ShapeBlue’s expertise, combined with CloudStack technology, allows IT 
>> Service providers and enterprises to deliver true, utility based, IaaS to 
>> the customer without reengineering existing physical, virtual or storage 
>> layers.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of 
>> this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor 
>> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
>> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in 
>> England&   Wales.
>
> ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting services to 
> help IT Service Providers and enterprises to build a true IaaS compute cloud. 
> ShapeBlue’s expertise, combined with CloudStack technology, allows IT Service 
> providers and enterprises to deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the 
> customer without reengineering existing physical, virtual or storage layers.
>
> ________________________________
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of 
> this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor 
> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in 
> England&  Wales.


ShapeBlue provides a range of strategic and technical consulting services to 
help IT Service Providers and enterprises to build a true IaaS compute cloud. 
ShapeBlue’s expertise, combined with CloudStack technology, allows IT Service 
providers and enterprises to deliver true, utility based, IaaS to the customer 
without reengineering existing physical, virtual or storage layers.

________________________________

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient of 
this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy 
or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in 
England & Wales.

Reply via email to