commit these changes if
there aren't any concerns.
- Devdeep Singh
On March 19, 2013, 5:18 p.m., Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.a
your comments.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:24 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1
>
>
it and commit it if
the changes look ok.
- Devdeep Singh
On March 13, 2013, 5:44 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
olumeDaoImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9541/#comment37646>
Why is the instanceid not null check needed?
server/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VolumeDaoImpl.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9541/#comment37647>
Similarly why is the instanceid is null check needed here?
-
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 10:12 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Graduate Apache CloudStack from the Incubator
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to invite the CloudStack community t
I have started putting together the FS for this feature. The initial draft is
shared here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Support+for+Intel+TXT+Technology.
Do let me know your comments/thoughts/concerns.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chatu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9799/#review17539
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On March 7, 2013, 11:27 a.m
Should CLOUDSTACK-1426 be included in the list. The same problem surfaces with
any api which takes storage pool id as a parameter. For example: migrateVolume.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaga...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06,
Hi Dan,
Following bug was fixed last week which enabled support for xcp 1.6
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-416. Not sure if anyone is
testing xcp 1.6 against cloudstack 4.1 though. If you are facing issues on
cloudstack 4.1 with xcp 1.6, you can raise bugs for it and someone c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555064#comment-13555064
]
Devdeep Singh edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-659 at 2/28/13 2:2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555064#comment-13555064
]
Devdeep Singh edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-659 at 2/28/13 2:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-1244:
--
Assignee: Sanjeev N (was: Devdeep Singh)
> fail to push sysmvm.iso onto
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589449#comment-13589449
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-1244:
---
Reassigning to Sanjee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13589448#comment-13589448
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-1244:
---
I tried reproducing
Congrats Sateesh, now you can merge the dvSwitch feature yourself.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 7:45 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Sateesh Chodapuneedi
Hi Dan,
The bugs cloudstack-83 looks very similar to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647. A fix for this was
checked in 4.1 branch. However, it was only tested for XenServer and not for
xcp. Not sure, but a similar change may be required for xcp too (probably in
xcposs/vmopsS
Congratulations Radhika.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 3:28 AM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath
> Subject: New committer: Radhika Puthiyetath
>
> Hi folks:
>
Hi Rohit,
You may also have to update the processConnect function in
XcpServerDiscoverer.java when you are enabling xcp1.6. Can you check that?
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: bhais...@apache.org [mailto:bhais...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 1:59 PM
> To:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9558/#review17074
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Feb. 25, 2013, 4:15 p.m
at it to make sure
the fix is right.
- Devdeep Singh
On Feb. 22, 2013, 9:15 a.m., Sanjay Tripathi wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apach
You can start with looking at createPool function in StorageManagerImpl.java.
The implementation specific to creating iSCSI storage for a XenServer is in
CitrixResourceBase.java. Look for how CreateStoragePoolCommand has been
handled. It calls getIscsiSR for creating a SR of type iSCSI on xen ho
As a contributor if a patch is submitted, applying that patch will fail if it
has trailing whitespaces. Maybe we should honor the convention of not
submitting code/patches with trailing spaces too.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_...@tcloudcomputing.c
Congrats Likitha.
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 8:07 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: New committer: Likitha Shetty
>
> Hi folks:
>
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache
Hi Caleb,
Do you have any instances running on the host? If not, then removing it
shouldn't cause any problems. Can you also check if xapi is running on the host.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebc...@me.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 5:37 A
Try this link https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Home. It
also gives access to most of the design docs.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:28 AM
> To: Abhinandan Prateek; Chi
HI Mike,
My understanding is that feature freeze for 4.1.0 happened on Jan 31st. So,
storage refactoring work may not be in it. It would be in 4.2 or whatever the
next release is. Someone on the list can correct me if I am wrong.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tutko
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-647.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in commit e162876605a31a4687ac77c5554e0a15ea7dda55
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13572184#comment-13572184
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-647:
--
The issue is that while bac
+1 for gerrit.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 12:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ACS41] 4.1 branch created
>
> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 2:23 AM, Marcus Sorensen
rg/r/8623/#review15999
---
On Dec. 16, 2012, 10:46 a.m., Devdeep Singh wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://revi
Hi,
I observed that the lisStoragePools api is broken if it is called with a
parameter. E.g if called with the zoneid parameter it fails with the following
exception
ERROR [cloud.api.ApiServer] (ApiServer-4:) unhandled exception executing api
command: listStoragePools
com.cloud.utils.exceptio
cloudstack will copy the scripts again to the host.
- Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8623/#review14552
----------
> > From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 5:28 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1
> >
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message---
--Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 6:58 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > F
Chip, Alex or David may be able to help you. They can give you the rights so
that bugs can be assigned to you :).
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:46 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13555064#comment-13555064
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-659:
--
Started working on
eep] Sateesh was going to look at Storage vMotion for VmWare. I'll ask him
to update on it.
>
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 1:58 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incu
cubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1
> >
> > Hi Devdeep,
> >
> > Can you please elaborate on the restrictions, if any on XenMotion
> > implementation when a volume has snapshots?
> >
> > Hari
> >
>
Storing it in host_details table with the "product_version" name should be
fine. For XS, that is where it is kept and it'll make sure it is consistent for
other hypervisors too.
Just for my understanding, what is the requirement for which you now need to
keep the Vmware host version details?
sumptions seem fair to me.
>
> I think the code name you refer to below for the attestation server is Intel
> internal codename - I'm not sure if we should be referring by this name..
>
> Hari
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si..
I would like to get some of the requirements cleared before working on the FS.
There were several assumptions made in the POC and they need to be clarified.
1. CloudStack will have to talk to a attestation server to check if a host is
trusted or not. Is it correct to assume the attestation serve
cussion - I wish to see how we can add vSphere as a supported
> platform for this feature..
>
> Hari
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 4:44 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
I have created an initial draft of the FS here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Enabling+Storage+XenMotion+for+XenServer.
I'll keep updating it based on discussion and comments.
Regards,
Devdeep
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [mailto
ingle Ids) but this design of planners should let you enforce the
> use of dedicated resources without major changes to planners.
Doesn't this mean that we are changing the core cloudstack code to achieve
dedicated resources features?
> -Original Message-
> From: Devdeep Singh [m
Hi Alex,
I assume some apis will be added for letting an admin dedicate a pod/cluster
etc to a domain. This can be contained in a plugin. However, for enforcing that
a dedicated resource is picked up for servicing deploy vm requests from a user;
wouldn't planners and allocators have to be updat
ject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Devdeep Singh
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > XenServer introduced support for Storage XenMotion in the latest
> >>versi
>
> Thanks,
> -Nitin
>
> On 19-Dec-2012, at 2:33 PM, Devdeep Singh wrote:
>
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > I was planning to cover the following scenarios:
> > 1. Live migrate a VM with disks from Host A to Host B within the same
> cluster. This currently wo
-- "support storage motion" when adding a
> cluster against one type of hypervisor, or add something in the global config.
>
> Jerry
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Devdeep Singh"
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: 星期三, 2012年 12
to another cluster.
>
> Is there anything on storage migration itself?
>
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Devdeep Singh [mailto:devdeep.si...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 12:40 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incuba
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 9:07 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enabling storage xenmotion on xenserver 6.1
>
> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 3
Hi,
XenServer introduced support for Storage XenMotion in the latest version (6.1).
Storage XenMotion allows VMs to be moved from one host to another, where the
VMs are not located on storage shared between the two hosts. It provides the
option to live migrate a VM's disks along with the VM its
Devdeep Singh created CLOUDSTACK-659:
Summary: Enable storage xenmotion support in XenServer 6.1
Key: CLOUDSTACK-659
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-659
Project: CloudStack
ile.
This addresses bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647.
Diffs
-
scripts/vm/hypervisor/xenserver/vmopsSnapshot 80e21f8
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8623/diff/
Testing
---
Tested by taking multiple snapshots of the same volume.
Thanks,
Devdeep Singh
Devdeep Singh created CLOUDSTACK-647:
Summary: Sanpshot failing on XenServer 6.1
Key: CLOUDSTACK-647
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647
Project: CloudStack
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-647:
-
Summary: Snapshot failing on XenServer 6.1 (was: Sanpshot failing on
XenServer 6.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-318.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Adding XenServer Host Fails - 6.0.2 fails with 4.
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:05 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-594?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-594:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
> Update the java binding used
cluster of XenServer hosts.
2. Deployed instances. Stopped and started them.
3. Migration of instances with in the cluster.
Thanks,
Devdeep Singh
cluster of XenServer hosts.
2. Deployed instances. Stopped and started them.
3. Migration of instances with in the cluster.
Thanks,
Devdeep Singh
. Deployed instances. Stopped and started them.
3. Migration of instances with in the cluster.
Thanks,
Devdeep Singh
rJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/VTPM.java c82fa3f
deps/XenServerJava/src/com/xensource/xenapi/XenAPIObject.java b500024
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8567/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Devdeep Singh
org/r/8566/diff/
Testing
---
Thanks,
Devdeep Singh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-369.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> ASF 4.0 - unable to support XenServer 6.1 h
Devdeep Singh created CLOUDSTACK-594:
Summary: Update the java binding used to the latest one that came
with XenServer 6.1
Key: CLOUDSTACK-594
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-594
instances.
3. Migrated instances within a cluster.
Thanks,
Devdeep Singh
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:44 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Adding support for XenServer 6.1 and Storage XenMotion
>
> > 2. Update the java bindings that are used by CloudStack for mak
Hi,
With XenServer 6.1, support for storage xenmotion has been added in XenServer.
I am planning to work on enabling support for XenServer 6.1 and storage
xenmotion in CloudStack. It'll involve the following activities:
1. Enable support in CloudStack for XenServer 6.1. There is already a bug f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh reassigned CLOUDSTACK-369:
Assignee: Devdeep Singh (was: Abhinandan Prateek)
> ASF 4.0 - unable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-301?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh reassigned CLOUDSTACK-301:
Assignee: Sateesh Chodapuneedi (was: Devdeep Singh)
> Nexus 1000v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-318?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13474812#comment-13474812
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-318:
--
Can you check if the sto
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7328/#review12224
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Oct. 8, 2012, 11:20 a.m
is matched?
utils/src/com/cloud/utils/net/NetUtils.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7328/#comment25877>
trailing space?
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 27, 2012, 5:26 p.m., Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-227:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0)
4.1.0
> ReconnectHost
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-227:
-
Status: Ready To Review (was: In Progress)
> ReconnectHost
> -Original Message-
> From: Busy Dev [mailto:busyd...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 4:43 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: 4.0 branch and Eclipse debugging
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently switched to the 4.0 branch (master changes too much) and am
> having tr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13465615#comment-13465615
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-227:
--
Submitted a review request
invalid network name for storage and checked the logs
for the exception thrown.
Thanks,
Devdeep Singh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh reassigned CLOUDSTACK-207:
Assignee: Devdeep Singh (was: Nitin Mehta)
> listCapacity API is not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh reassigned CLOUDSTACK-227:
Assignee: Devdeep Singh
> ReconnectHostCmd: NullPointerException: Una
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7288/#review11980
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 27, 2012, 11:42 a.m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13463594#comment-13463594
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-105:
--
Besides looking into
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13462811#comment-13462811
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-105:
--
One way I could trigger crea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-105?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13462703#comment-13462703
]
Devdeep Singh commented on CLOUDSTACK-105:
--
I have been trying to repro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-117.
--
Resolution: Not A Problem
This behavior is by design. Confirmed it against older
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7057/#review11733
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 20, 2012, 11:40 a.m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh resolved CLOUDSTACK-112.
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Tried the scenario against a 6.0.2 host and I am not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-112?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13458518#comment-13458518
]
Devdeep Singh edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-112 at 9/19/12 8:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13457616#comment-13457616
]
Devdeep Singh edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-91 at 9/18/12 4:3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-91?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh reassigned CLOUDSTACK-91:
---
Assignee: Saksham Srivastava (was: Devdeep Singh)
Assigning to Saksham, he is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh reassigned CLOUDSTACK-83:
---
Assignee: deepti dohare (was: Devdeep Singh)
Assigning to Deepti, who is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7113/#review11606
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 14, 2012, 3:47 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7058/#review11604
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 14, 2012, 3:17 p.m
on can return a boolean.
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 12, 2012, 5:05 p.m., Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews
tps://reviews.apache.org/r/7057/#comment24775>
Just a nitpik, please correct the spacing and the brackets.
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 12, 2012, 4:23 p.m., Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically gener
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-83:
Assignee: Devdeep Singh
> hitting exception when trying to take two consecut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-83?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Devdeep Singh updated CLOUDSTACK-83:
Assignee: (was: Devdeep Singh)
> hitting exception when trying to take
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6895/#review11394
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 11, 2012, 9:11 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6899/#review11233
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 4, 2012, 12:24 p.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6858/#review11095
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Devdeep Singh
On Sept. 6, 2012, 11:01 a.m
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
