+1
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 03/11/2013 06:37 PM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Chip Childers
>>> [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.**com
>>> ]
>>> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2013 9:42 AM
>>> To:
>>> cloudstack-dev
+1 (binding)
> [X] +1 approve
--
Best Regards,
-- Alex
Call me ignorant since I've never really used Gerrit. Someone just brought
it to my attention once. Initially I just liked it because it seemed like a
nice tool for collaborating (commenting) on code rather than using it for
review policy enforcement. I understand as a matter of policy, code review
Ooops sent this to Brett directly. Thanks for the heads up Brett.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 4:36 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
>>
>> On 07/02/2013, at 12:05 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
>>
>> > The p
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Edison Su wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> > Alex Karasulu
> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 2:24 AM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.ap
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > +1 !
>
> Yay mentor vote! Thanks Jim!
>
> Are any of our other mentors members able to spend some time and cast
> a vote?
Doing the functional testing to the best of my ability righ
Hey Chiradeep, Phong sorry, I have little to no connectivity at the moment.
This mail was written yesterday before Phong's response and just got
pushed out now when I got online. Excuse the noise.
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Hi Chiradeep,
>
>
> On
o primary storage from some store
> (e.g., a web server).
>
>
>
Thanks for the heads up and offer to help. After meeting with Phong next
week we'll report back to the list.
Regards,
Alex
> On 1/8/13 4:42 PM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jan 9,
Awesome I've been looking forward to Cisco UCS support for some time now.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> +1 let's do it!
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > - chip
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone.
> >
> > On Jan 30, 2013, at 8:32 PM, Fr
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Sheng Liang wrote:
> > At the same time we are really close to freeze, this potentially blocks
> the work of others; and while it should be mostly innocuous, it is still a
> large amount of disruption, for what appears to me to be > precious little
> benefit for t
t; Thanks,
> -Phong
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <
> chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 1/7/13 1:17 PM, "Alex Karasulu" wrote:
> >
> > >On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Ale
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> Hi Phong,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Phong Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are inter
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Hi Phong,
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Phong Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are interested in adding LXC support to Cloudstack.
>
>
> I've also been interested in Cloudstack support fo
Hi Phong,
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Phong Nguyen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are interested in adding LXC support to Cloudstack.
I've also been interested in Cloudstack support for LXC. I checked a few
days ago for it and was disappointed when I could not find it but found
support for it in Ope
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:08 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > Before going too deep into incentive programs, though, I'd encourage
> > checking out Stormy Peters' talk: "Would you do it again for free?"
> >
> > http://stormyscorner.com/would-you-do-it-again-for-free
> >
> > tl;dr - incentive programs
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1 for Apache Maven
Ditto but this can happen any time and in parallel. I understand and
appreciate the time limitations for the 4.0 release.
> (but I agree my POV can be considered non objective :-)
> ) or at least our own Apache dogfood
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Alex Huang wrote:
> After doing the merge over process one time, I realize something is wrong
> with CS structure. We should think about fixing this.
>
> The problems I found are
>
> - I know nothing about the UI but I'm responsible for it.
> - Someone who is a
ubject.
> --Alex
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> > Alex Karasulu
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2012 5:33 AM
> > To: cloudstack-us...@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: really bad UI design
I can help as well but I'm MIA for the next 3 weeks on vacation. I'll start
looking into the current source tree configuration to see how we can
Mavenize.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Hugo Trippaers <
htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I have limited amount of experience with M
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2012 11:01 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>
>>
>> The point David also made is the question: Which platforms are we going
>>> to
>>> build binaries for?
>>>
>>> To put it in a simple way: "The agent is nothing more then a couple o
I think the key here is to be as inclusive as possible. Plus do you really
want another list to have to manage? Users is probably the superset list.
Let there be chatter around events! It's a good thing IMHO.
-A
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:41 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> > Hi folks:
> >
> > So one of the things that PMCs are charged with is maintaining the
> > brand of a project[1][2], and while it's a responsibility of the PMC,
> > I brought the discuss
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I like to summarize exactly what we want to use OSGi for. To Mohammad's
> point, CloudStack will be splitting out most of its plugins into separate
> jar files and put in appropriate build dependencies. I will send out a
> separate
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Chris Custine wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 30, 2012 at 12:32 PM, Frank Zhang wrote:
> > I have some different thoughts here
> >
> > > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 at 10:29 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
> > >
> > > > CloudStack is built as a product with modularity enforced by
>
d here at Apache.
> --Prasanna
>
>
> --Original Message--
> From: Alex Karasulu
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> ReplyTo: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: E-Mail client guidelines on the mailing list
> Sent: 8 May 2012 19:18
>
>
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Robert Schweikert wrote:
>
>
> On 05/08/2012 04:16 AM, Ram Chinta wrote:
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 5:14 AM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: E-Ma
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Prasanna Santhanam <
prasanna.santha...@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 11:09:35AM -0400, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Kevin Kluge
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi
Hi Kevin,
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> Hi Alex, glad to hear you think the community is working well. We
> followed the template that was pre-existing and added content to it.
> Personally I think it's fine, but this is my first involvement in producing
> this report so
Hi all,
I hope all of you are having fun here after the move. I'd like to take this
opportunity to welcome everyone. The community is very lively and effective
in participating on the mailing lists. Infrastructure work to get fully
situated is moving along. All signs are positive IMO.
As you may
d the
> complexity of Kerberos deployment brought into the picture, we haven't
> looked into it.
>
>
>
Understood. Thanks for the background Kelven.
> -Original Message-
> From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Alex
> Karasulu
> Sent:
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> Access token is exactly another added layer, the first security layer is
> provided through HTTPS web session. Second layer is the dynamic access
> token, third-layer is the timely expiration of access token.
>
>
The flow and use cases I'm see
31 matches
Mail list logo
