On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:13 PM, Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>wrote: > >> Hi Phong, >> >> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Phong Nguyen <pngu...@gilt.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> We are interested in adding LXC support to Cloudstack. >> >> >> I've also been interested in Cloudstack support for LXC. I checked a few >> days ago for it and was disappointed when I could not find it but found >> support for it in OpenStack instead :P. I wanted to inquire about adding >> LXC support thinking this might be a good starting point for my getting >> involved in the code. At this point, I have nothing further to contribute >> besides the link you already found, but I thought if others saw more people >> interested then LXC support might be considered. >> >> > Here's a bit more chatter on this topic but as we see it's not been > implemented. Rip for the picking ... > > http://goo.gl/x60At > > s/Rip/Ripe/ damn autocorrect on pad. > > >> I've searched around >>> for container support for Cloudstack and was able to find one posting >>> related to OpenVZ (over a year ago): >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=28030821 >>> >> >> BTW OpenVZ is great stuff but I've found the fact that you need a custom >> Kernel a bit of a problem. LXC is much better in this sense since it's >> already present in every kernel past 2.6.26 (or 2.6.29?) but that's besides >> the point of this thread. Sorry for digressing. >> >> Is there any current, on-going, or future work planned in this area? Are >>> there any architectural changes since then that would affect the >>> suggestions in this posting? Any other suggestions greatly appreciated. >>> >>> >> I too am interested in these details. >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >> > > > -- > Best Regards, > -- Alex > -- Best Regards, -- Alex
