[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532146#comment-13532146
]
sebastien goasguen commented on CLOUDSTACK-425:
---
It would also be good t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532141#comment-13532141
]
David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-622:
-
Committed to master; assigning to j
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley updated CLOUDSTACK-622:
Assignee: Joe Brockmeier (was: Pranav Saxena)
> In the add primary storage dialog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-509?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley closed CLOUDSTACK-509.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed to master
Branch: refs/heads/master
Commit: b70c1a5a84ee014
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8575/#review14499
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Dec. 13, 2012, 7:57 p.m., Brian
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8578/#review14497
---
Work in progress, will see test this tomorrow.
- Rohit Yadav
On De
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8123/#review14496
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Nov. 26, 2012, 9:44 p.m., John B
There is no hook so committer would submit a review with a ship it and the
commit log.
I use rbtool to list pending reviews and track them:
$ rbtool -l (https://github.com/bhaisaab/RBTool)
Regards.
From: David Nalley [da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, December
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nitin Mehta reopened CLOUDSTACK-505:
Hi Chip - I am reopening the issue as it doesnt solve the problem for deployvm
and reset v
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13532120#comment-13532120
]
Nitin Mehta commented on CLOUDSTACK-505:
addHost:
2012-12-12 14:05:47,442 IN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasanna Santhanam resolved CLOUDSTACK-284.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Prasanna Santhanam
Fixed with following
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8037/#review14495
---
Ship it!
commit 0ba355fbc20411890b74f7b6f33edc057c493259
Author: Sim
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8289/#review14493
---
Ship it!
looks good. applied to master branch.
Thanks for the patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley resolved CLOUDSTACK-333.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch here: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7571
commit 8ced7da733f8
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8013/#review14491
---
Ship it!
applied on master
commit 988ccfc45d8a4f7b689a75adc76c06f0e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7571/#review14490
---
Ship it!
Applied on master
commit 8ced7da733f8f3e9402495a239f037804
+1
On 12/13/12 2:05 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
wrote:
>Yes it makes sense
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:25 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] "Future" release record
No, buildsystemvm.sh does not run as part of maven. It pretty much runs
only on a debian Squeeze/wheezy box. It has the PV drivers but not the xs
tools required for live migration. The xs tools actually get in the way
since they enforce checks on os/hv compatibility in the source/destination
hyperv
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Edison Su wrote:
> Looks like, the nosql-on-mysql
> (http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/whats-new-in-mysql-5.6.html#nosql)
> an ideal solution for cloudstack API layer.
> "Using the memcached API, web services can now directly access the InnoDB
> stor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8464/#review14487
---
Applied with
commit 2a8b9e513045bb1d5be93c192e3663f6db5cef4c
Author:
>
> My first question is, where do I start? :)
Welcome!
You've done a good job starting by subscribing to the list and sending
this mail.
>
> I've gotten an account on GitHub. I've forked the repo and cloned it
> locally to my development computer. I have Eclipse in place and am trying
> to g
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8464/#review14486
---
Ship it!
looks good to me
- Prasanna Santhanam
On Dec. 11, 2012,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8082/#review14485
---
Ship it!
commit 4b539ddcb3e37810757e74b2a6060ec6f4776e07
Author: Tal
Hi David,
Please do add the following to the list:
http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-Bangalore-Group/
http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-Hyderabad-Group/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/cloudstack/
-Thanks
Radhika
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Frida
This is a good start and we should look for various options to speed up
the db access.
For cloudstack ACID compliance is important and some of these solutions
achieve speed by trading off ACID properties. So I guess complete
replacement of SQL may not be possible.
There is another option of using
Hi everyone,
As Edison mentioned, I'm employed at SolidFire (solidfire.com). SolidFire
is located in Boulder, CO. We develop a clustered SAN technology
with features such as inline compression, data de-duplication, thin
provisioning, and hard quality-of-service guarantees (running exclusively
on
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> David
>
> How do we track after a review is approved, that it is actually committed?
Ideally the reviewer will put the commit log message into the review
after it has been committed.
Some of the reviews I had to search the commit l
David
How do we track after a review is approved, that it is actually committed?
Animesh
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:48 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: PLEASE READ: Patches in desperate
Looks like, the nosql-on-mysql
(http://dev.mysql.com/tech-resources/articles/whats-new-in-mysql-5.6.html#nosql)
an ideal solution for cloudstack API layer.
"Using the memcached API, web services can now directly access the InnoDB
storage engine without transformations to SQL, ensuring low latenc
Fang,
Please add a improvement issue in Jira and have it set for 4.1 release on this.
This will help track the progress of this feature.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Fang Wang [mailto:fang.w...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 8:57 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubato
Hi folks,
Prior to our move at the ASF there were a number of social media
accounts held in the CloudStack project's name.
Off the top of my head these include:
http://twitter.com/cloudstack
http://identi.ca/cloudstack
https://www.youtube.com/cloudstack
http://www.facebook.com/CloudStack
http://
Updated the FS wiki page for the API refactoring with the current progress.
Will add more details
Later about the validation logic.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+API+refactoring
Thanks,
-Fang
Folks:
I know we are all busy and have a ton of things to do. But we have a
ton of reviews pending. (48) and many of those have had little or no
feedback at all. The below patches have had no meaningful review, and
some are as old as 2 months. Please make some time in the next few
days to review t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8578/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Rohit Yadav.
Description
---
Add the enti
Hi, Howie
You can find most #ccc12# presentations here:
http://www.aarondelp.com/2012/12/links-to-everything-cloudstack.html
But no "Hack Fest" yet, here is another one relate to test
infrastructure by Prasanna:
https://speakerdeck.com/vogxn/ccc12-lasvegas-apachetestinfrastructure
On Fri, Dec 14,
Hi all
I am a new one want to have some contribution for this community.
Recently, I was tracing source code and write some plugin for cloudstack.
But it's very difficult for debug and testing in cloudstack environment.
Because cloudstack's IoC is write by componentLocator, I cannot write unit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8237/#review14482
---
Might like to see the following corrections before shipping.
docs/e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8237/#review14480
---
To answer the question in the original review request -- user registr
Isn't there a use case for a plugin that has both server and GUI components?
May be we should keep the name generic.
Thanks
Animesh
On Dec 13, 2012, at 5:08 PM, "Pranav Saxena" wrote:
> Yeah , we can pick different names for each plugin . I am not sure if we'll
> keep a specific format for
Centos also has a desirable file structure for many as well :)
-Original Message-
From: Donal Lafferty [mailto:donal.laffe...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 12:34 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: CentOS System Offering Thread
1. Can you remind me o
That's my issue too, I use outlook.
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:04 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Email Conventions
Chip
I did not find an Option for Auto nesting in Outl
The feature wish list has been updated to reflect the round table at CCC.
Please review and add details if any of these requests came from you, also feel
free to clean up the organization.
Thanks
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Features+Wish+List
http://www.backbon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531887#comment-13531887
]
Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-591:
Applied on 4.0:
commit 0e34bcc7778e7
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Manan Shah updated CLOUDSTACK-621:
--
Description:
Requirements described at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDS
Yeah , we can pick different names for each plugin . I am not sure if we'll
keep a specific format for the naming . All what is required is mapping to a
unique ID associated with that plugin which would take care of adding a third
party plugin to the cloudstack dashboard.
Regards,
Pranav
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Nalley updated CLOUDSTACK-591:
Fix Version/s: 4.0.1
> Wrong vnet in iptables on KVM hypervisors after VM reboot
>
Sonny Chhen created CLOUDSTACK-625:
--
Summary: 3rd Party Plugin
Key: CLOUDSTACK-625
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-625
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New Feature
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 05:18:30AM +0530, Donal Lafferty wrote:
> Where do client libraries go in the source tree? Does it matter if
> they're not written in Java?
>
> The background is that there's a .NET SDK that can be added to the
> project. Architecturally, its similar to AWS' .NET SDK. No
I've a question on terminology.
Are these 'GUI plugins' going to use the same component.xml class loader as
existing plugins? If not, can we pick different names for each approach to
providing a plugin? E.g. 'GUI plugins' and 'driver plugins'?
DL
-Original Message-
From: Pranav Saxe
Where do client libraries go in the source tree? Does it matter if they're not
written in Java?
The background is that there's a .NET SDK that can be added to the project.
Architecturally, its similar to AWS' .NET SDK. Now, not all API calls are
covered, but the API calls supported provide a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Rohit Yadav resolved CLOUDSTACK-591.
Resolution: Fixed
commit 1ae2d720a3ca3bde2baacb0d06610e7466f95bfe
Author: Bill Rich
Da
Thanks Bill applied on master, pl. close the review and help verify if that
works now for you.
Regards.
On 13-Dec-2012, at 3:27 PM, Bill Rich
mailto:bill.r...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Cool. Thank you!
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@citrix.com>> wrote:
Hi Bill,
No
Thanks David for brining a good point regarding 2.18. You are correct that
a VLAN should not be exposed to an end user. I will re-word the
requirement to make it more specific for an admin to assign a VLAN.
Regards,
Manan Shah
On 12/13/12 1:24 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>It's very hard to hav
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8406/#review14472
---
Ship it!
Thanks Bill, thank you for your patch.
Applied on master;
Hi Chiradeep,
To clear up some confusion, does the current script (buildsystemvm.sh) run as
part of the maven build?
Again, to clear up some confusion, can you comment on whether buildsystem.sh
adds pv-drivers need to a System VM? I was confused by comments last week
about whether the VMM-sp
XenServer supports grub2 since 5.6 fp1 version.
Anthony
> -Original Message-
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 3:00 PM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: CentOS System Offering Thread
>
> Yes, it is for performan
Hi All,
Please join me welcome Mike from SolidFire. Mike will work on SolidFire
integration into Cloudstack, and the ongoing storage refactor.
Looking forward working with him in the future.
Yes, it is for performance reasons.
CentOS
-has a different place for network init scripts
-has a different initialization scheme (chkconfig vs LSB init)
-has a different place to initialize iptables
Centos also may use GRUB-legacy vs GRUB2 for booting.
The current systemvm uses GRUB-legacy si
Hi John,
I'll review the patch today, sorry for the late.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: S3-backed Secondary Storage Enhancement
>
> Chip,
>
>
I changed the mapping in the response class back to @Entity. So your code is
fine now.
Thanks,
-Fang
From: Likitha Shetty [mailto:nore...@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Likitha
Shetty
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:40 PM
To: Rohit Yadav; Fang Wang
Cc: cloudstack; Likitha Shetty
Subject
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 03:38:01AM +0530, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:22 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Email Conventions
Currently , we haven't discussed access based scenario for a plugin . But yes ,
this won't be a tough thing to incorporate. We can enable /disable a UI plugin
based on admin or a normal user .
Regards,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Fang Wang [mailto:fang.w...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sonny Chhen reassigned CLOUDSTACK-622:
--
Assignee: Pranav Saxena
> In the add primary storage dialog in the ui the RBD f
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:22 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Email Conventions : Subject Line Prefixes
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
Yes it makes sense
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:25 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] "Future" release record in Jira to help with triage
>
> Hi all,
>
> In looking at th
+1
-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 1:25 PM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] "Future" release record in Jira to help with triage
Hi all,
In looking at the list of jira records that have
No worries.
Was just ensuring that I wasn't doing something wrong.
Thanks for the reply and enjoy the vacation :)
On 14/12/12 10:29, Wido den Hollander wrote:
Hi,
On 12/13/2012 10:15 PM, Robert Vally wrote:
Hi all,
Do we know if it should possible to create a nonoss DEB package from the
mast
Hi,
On 12/13/2012 10:15 PM, Robert Vally wrote:
Hi all,
Do we know if it should possible to create a nonoss DEB package from the
master branch at the moment?
When I try "mvn install -P vmware && dpkg-buildpackage", I get a bunch
of DEB files, but they all appear to be only around 4K in size wi
worksforme
Hi all,
Do we know if it should possible to create a nonoss DEB package from the
master branch at the moment?
When I try "mvn install -P vmware && dpkg-buildpackage", I get a bunch
of DEB files, but they all appear to be only around 4K in size with a
single .tar.gz of around 600M.
Regards
It's very hard to have a discussion here when all of the information
to be discussed is elsewhere. Please consider posting it here for the
discussion.
WRT 2.18 - Allowing an end user to assign a VLAN ID strikes me as
very undesirable. First, it allows users to have insight into the
underlying inf
Hi all,
In looking at the list of jira records that have no fix version in
them, I realize that we probably need to start triaging them on a
semi-regular basis.
In order to ensure that the triage work doesn't require looking at the
same list over and over again, I'd like to propose that we use a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-4:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: pre-4.0.0)
4.1.0
> Complete installation gu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-387:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-390:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-364:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-410:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-382:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-425?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-425:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-559:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-1:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
Moving unresolved issues from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-343:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chip Childers updated CLOUDSTACK-381:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0)
4.1.0
Moving unresolved issues fro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531503#comment-13531503
]
Chip Childers commented on CLOUDSTACK-505:
--
Related commands also fixed:
mas
On Dec 13, 2012, at 5:19 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> Chip, some thoughts inline.
>>
>> Don't mind the pickiness.
>
> Thanks for the review. Any no, I don't mind the pickiness!
>
>> On Dec 13, 2012, at 3:30 AM, Chip Childers wrote
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>
>> On 06-Dec-2012, at 9:17 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
For writing commit messages, I think branch name may not be useful b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
sebastien goasguen resolved CLOUDSTACK-623.
---
Resolution: Not A Problem
> test, please discard
> --
sebastien goasguen created CLOUDSTACK-623:
-
Summary: test, please discard
Key: CLOUDSTACK-623
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-623
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Jie Feng wrote:
>> Comments inline.
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 5:12 PM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> I updated the wiki 'Mailing List' section with a table for commonly used
> prefixes. This will need some collaboration and discussion to settle down.
> Please review and update. Bring back any questions to the mailing list
>
> Open it
> Advanced Search: There is a UI feature called "Advanced Search", which has a
> design document [2] listed. I'm not able to find a Jira record for it. I
> see that Brian Federle had checked this into master (noted in [3]). Brian,
> can you please create a Jira record for it?
Sure, I'll cre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13531409#comment-13531409
]
Brian Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-622:
I have submitted a patch for review
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8575/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Wido den Hollander.
Description
---
Added
Adding to the feature request sheet
-kd
>>>-Original Message-
>>>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:44 AM
>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>Subject: [ASFCS41] nTier Apps 2.0
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>
>>>I would like to propose a new f
Brian Angus created CLOUDSTACK-622:
--
Summary: In the add primary storage dialog in the ui the RBD
fields don't disappear when changing from RBD to another protocol
Key: CLOUDSTACK-622
URL: https://issues.apache.o
This is a silly question, Do we allow all plugins to have same access role?
OR some plugins have admin access, and some plugins for users only?
Thanks,
-Fang
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 10:52 AM
T
No , the UI just needs to be refreshed . There is no need to restart management
server.
Regards,
Pranav
-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2012 11:39 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: '[P
Hi,
I would like to propose a new feature for extending the nTier Apps feature
introduced in CS 4.0. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided the
requirements at the following location. Please provide feedback on the
requirements.
JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> On 06-Dec-2012, at 9:17 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012, at 11:14 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>> For writing commit messages, I think branch name may not be useful but
>>> what your commit is doing is more important maybe?
>>
>
Manan Shah created CLOUDSTACK-621:
-
Summary: nTier Apps 2.0 Features
Key: CLOUDSTACK-621
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-621
Project: CloudStack
Issue Type: New Feature
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
