[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-376) Issues in docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13479649#comment-13479649 ] Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-376: - about the item (6) There is no refe

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-376) Issues in docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13479644#comment-13479644 ] Radhika Nair commented on CLOUDSTACK-376: - About downloading vhd-util: Shouldn

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-378) mavenize marvin on master

Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-378: - Summary: mavenize marvin on master Key: CLOUDSTACK-378 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-378 Project: CloudStack Issue

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-377) provide deployment config access to marvin's testcase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Prasanna Santhanam resolved CLOUDSTACK-377. --- Resolution: Fixed commit 7460b018935ae224334b44bf3198ce38da2dc105 Author:

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-377) provide deployment config access to marvin's testcase

Prasanna Santhanam created CLOUDSTACK-377: - Summary: provide deployment config access to marvin's testcase Key: CLOUDSTACK-377 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-377 Project:

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-364) Docs point to download.cloud.com for AWS API script

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Radhika Nair reassigned CLOUDSTACK-364: --- Assignee: Radhika Nair > Docs point to download.cloud.com for AWS API script

[jira] [Assigned] (CLOUDSTACK-376) Issues in docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Radhika Nair reassigned CLOUDSTACK-376: --- Assignee: Radhika Nair (was: Jessica Tomechak) > Issues in docs > --

Re: [Doc] Review and Testing request: All documents! Sign up for your part on the wiki

Hi, Jessica I saw a big part was missing for docbook: vmware vsphere hypervisor installation. I just signed and hopefully can provide it early next week. On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Jessica Tomechak wrote: > During IRC chat today, it was proposed that we review and use-test all > documentat

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

+1 to fix it for 4.0.1 version -1 to drop it -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 3:05 PM To: Subject: Re: Drop OVM in 4.0? Also, if it hasn't worked in several past non-Apache releases, are we really dropping suppor

Re: [4.1 feature RFC] Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone

On 10/18/12 4:59 AM, "Murali Reddy" wrote: >On 17/10/12 10:42 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" >wrote: > >>Murali, some comments: >> >>1) "During network design phase of network creation, 'Direct network >>Guru' which designs the shared networks shall setup the network to be in >> Network.State.Allocated

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:06 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:00:03PM -0700, Edison Su wrote: >> Nobody complains OVM doesn't work in 4.0 before, means nobody use and >> test it on 4.0 branch since half year ago when we starting to work on >> 4.0 release. > > "Since half a yea

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-376) Issues in docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13479483#comment-13479483 ] edison su commented on CLOUDSTACK-376: -- I read the docs build from jenkins.c.o on

[jira] [Updated] (CLOUDSTACK-376) Issues in docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Nalley updated CLOUDSTACK-376: Description: 19:03 < edison_cs> • Provde the CPU 19:03 < edison_cs> in page 7 19:03 < e

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-376) Issues in docs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13479467#comment-13479467 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-376: - may we know what it is?

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-376) Issues in docs

edison su created CLOUDSTACK-376: Summary: Issues in docs Key: CLOUDSTACK-376 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-376 Project: CloudStack Issue Type: Bug Reporte

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 03:00:03PM -0700, Edison Su wrote: > Nobody complains OVM doesn't work in 4.0 before, means nobody use and > test it on 4.0 branch since half year ago when we starting to work on > 4.0 release. "Since half a year ago"? Let's be realistic. How long has the 4.0 branch been i

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-375) Unable to delete physical network - because there are other networks attached

ilya musayev created CLOUDSTACK-375: --- Summary: Unable to delete physical network - because there are other networks attached Key: CLOUDSTACK-375 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-375

RE: cloud-setup-databases build 756

Looking at the latest build of 4.0.0 install guide, I find only the following: 8. Set up the database. The following command creates the cloud user on the database.  In dbpassword, specify the password to be assigned to the cloud user. You can choose to provide no password.  In dbhost, provide

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

Also, if it hasn't worked in several past non-Apache releases, are we really dropping support now? I'm -1 for considering it a blocker for 4.0.0-incubating. It can always be added back / fixed / whatever if someone cares about doing that. I say we move forward without changing the current state (

RE: cloud-setup-databases build 756

> Subject: RE: cloud-setup-databases build 756 > > That is true, but it does not seem to change once a zone is deployed. So if > that 'undocumented' step is missed, Jessica, I think changing cluster.node.IP field should have documented in chapters of setting up clustered mgmt servers. Am I righ

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

> -Original Message- > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:16 PM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Drop OVM in 4.0? > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:54:03PM -0700, Edison Su wrote: > > Yesterday, I read a blog talking ab

Re: Rant: Request for better commit messages

Ok, this is now in master, see 9ba7509c70fe82a8ce0b08826d424de452aef1d2 set it up by running the following from your incubator-cloudstack dir: 'ln -s ../../tools/git/prepare-commit-msg .git/hooks/prepare-commit-msg' Developers can also optionally commit different prepare-commit-msg scripts for e

RE: cloud-setup-databases build 756

That is true, but it does not seem to change once a zone is deployed. So if that 'undocumented' step is missed, the user needs to start redeploy the db with 'cloud-setup-databases cloud:password@127.0.0.1" (no deploy-as) and then reconfigure db.properties, and re-run "cloud-setup-management" .

Re: StaticNAT, Portforwarding and FIrewall implemenation on the SRX

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote: > Hi Sangeetha, > > Once concern in doing that is effect on existing deployments. What's that concern? I don't think any customer have ability to set firewall explicitly for external devices in the past? I don't know why we need to kee

RE: cloud-setup-databases build 756

You can change the ip after running the script Go got /etc/cloud/management/db.properties, see cluster.node.IP field. Tough, having a CLI option would be a nice to have feature From: Kelcey Damage (BBITS) [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:19 PM To: CloudStack dev list Sub

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-374) When running cloud-setup-databases, it auto chooses the highest priority nic(lowest number ie: eth0)

kelcey damage created CLOUDSTACK-374: Summary: When running cloud-setup-databases, it auto chooses the highest priority nic(lowest number ie: eth0) Key: CLOUDSTACK-374 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: cloud-setup-databases build 756

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote: > > When running cloud-setup-databases, it auto chooses the highest priority > nic(lowest number ie: eth0) for: > > > > “Detected local IP address as 192.168.1.187, will use as cluster management > server node IP[ OK ]” > > > > Would

cloud-setup-databases build 756

When running cloud-setup-databases, it auto chooses the highest priority nic(lowest number ie: eth0) for: “Detected local IP address as 192.168.1.187, will use as cluster management server node IP[ OK ]” Would it be possible to provide a new command line argument for establishing host? S

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 01:54:03PM -0700, Edison Su wrote: > Yesterday, I read a blog talking about open source > project(http://blog.ometer.com/2012/03/15/a-few-thoughts-on-open-projects-with-mention-of-scala/), > in the " Project direction and priorities " section, which makes sense > to me: > >

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

Yesterday, I read a blog talking about open source project(http://blog.ometer.com/2012/03/15/a-few-thoughts-on-open-projects-with-mention-of-scala/), in the " Project direction and priorities " section, which makes sense to me: "An open project and its community are the sum of individual people

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

Is there anyone actually using OVM that is involved here on the dev list? The reason I ask is because I initially got involved with cloudstack development because CLVM was being dropped, and I needed it. If there are resources among Citrix or elsewhere to work on OVM that's great, then perhaps we c

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:10:35AM -0700, Kevin Kluge wrote: >> There's nothing in CloudStack to track that so we cannot be definitive. >> But, it can't be many. We have seen few questions about its usage >> and integration. And OVM's shar

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:10:35AM -0700, Kevin Kluge wrote: > There's nothing in CloudStack to track that so we cannot be definitive. > But, it can't be many. We have seen few questions about its usage > and integration. And OVM's share of the server virtualization market > is quite low. Given

Template downloads, ACS 4.0 - build 756

Hi Running build 756 and I am having the following issue: templates and ISOs are not downloading. I have verified that the SSVM can talk to the internet, and DNS is resolving. The template/ISO will succeed in registering, however that is the last system acknowledgement. I get no errors in th

Re: [DOCS][DISCUSS] Some style / formatting issues in docs

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:03:46AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:51:15AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: >> > That said, our Java coding standards says lines shouldn't be more than >> > 80 chars: >> > http://docs.clo

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

There's nothing in CloudStack to track that so we cannot be definitive. But, it can't be many. We have seen few questions about its usage and integration. And OVM's share of the server virtualization market is quite low. Given limited user impact, if this is really the only problem I'd defe

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

> -Original Message- > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co] > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:04 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Drop OVM in 4.0? > > I suspect I know the answer to that...so, do we want to consider adding > (optional) code in the

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

So, we should drop mention of OVM in CloudStack docs? There are a couple of mentions, such as in the adding-a-host section. Jessica T. CloudStack Tech Pubs -Original Message- From: Will Chan [mailto:will.c...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:02 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incu

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

Do we have any idea how many CS users use OVM? I suspect I know the answer to that…so, do we want to consider adding (optional) code in the future to phone home with some usage stats? On Oct 18, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Will Chan wrote: > It will take > week to get the existing OVM support to work a

RE: Drop OVM in 4.0?

It will take > week to get the existing OVM support to work again. The reason being CloudPlatform doesn't have this working in our recent releases since Acton. Adding support for the latest OVM will take even longer. I would vote to have OVM be fixed in a later 4.0.x release. Will > -Ori

Re: [RFC] QinQ vlans support

Ah, well it's pretty simple, so I'll just paste it here. Again, perhaps more should be implemented regarding the MTU (like functionality to configure MTU on the virtual router), but if you know what to do it can all work via switch configs. diff --git a/plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hyper

RE: new committer: Gavin Lee

Congrats Gavin, keep hacking! From: Gavin Lee [gavin@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 8:13 PM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer: Gavin Lee Thanks guys. I'm so pleased and honored, I wish I could make more cont

Re: [DOCS][DISCUSS] Some style / formatting issues in docs

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:03:46AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:51:15AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > That said, our Java coding standards says lines shouldn't be more than > > 80 chars: > > http://docs.cloudstack.org/CloudStack_Documentation/Design_Documents/Coding_Co

Re: [DOCS][DISCUSS] Some style / formatting issues in docs

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:51:15AM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > > I'd also like to discuss the formatting / wrapping of the files > > themselves. The release notes are hard-wrapped right now so that there > > are line breaks at about 80-100 columns even if it means something like > > this: > > > >

Re: [DOCS][DISCUSS] Some style / formatting issues in docs

> I'd also like to discuss the formatting / wrapping of the files > themselves. The release notes are hard-wrapped right now so that there > are line breaks at about 80-100 columns even if it means something like > this: > > > I've got some text here > and it wraps oddly. > > My XML OCD

Re: new committer: Gavin Lee

On 18 October 2012 20:13, Gavin Lee wrote: > Thanks guys. > I'm so pleased and honored, I wish I could make more contribution to > the community. > Meanwhile, I created and maintained http://www.cloudstack-china.org > for Chinese guys who want to know CS better. > We also setup tech salon periodic

Re: new committer: Gavin Lee

Thanks guys. I'm so pleased and honored, I wish I could make more contribution to the community. Meanwhile, I created and maintained http://www.cloudstack-china.org for Chinese guys who want to know CS better. We also setup tech salon periodically in Major city all over China, just finished one in

[jira] [Created] (CLOUDSTACK-373) static NAT and Firewall is not working on external firewall device SRX, it needs to be implemented

Jayapal Reddy created CLOUDSTACK-373: Summary: static NAT and Firewall is not working on external firewall device SRX, it needs to be implemented Key: CLOUDSTACK-373 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse

Re: [DISCUSS] QA/Testing focus on 4.1

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 06:22:32PM -0400, David Nalley wrote: > Warning: This is a long ponderous email. Stop now and get your cup > of coffee/tea/$beverage. I have my $beverage and I'm very happy to see this thread. :) > > So my proposal in short is that we focus on testing, beginning > immedia

Re: Drop OVM in 4.0?

On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 04:50:41PM -0700, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >> +1 on fixing in a 4.0.x. >> We need to make some tough decisions if we want "time based releases". >> We already dropped AutoScale and Brocade even though they were essent

Re: [RFC] QinQ vlans support

On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:42 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > Sorry, I've been up to my ears. I've attached the simple patch that > makes this all happen, if anyone wants to take a look. This is the > code that looks for physical devices. It's passed a bridge and then > determines the parent of that

[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-102) INSTALL.txt needs to be updated before ASF4 relesae

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Rohit Yadav resolved CLOUDSTACK-102. Resolution: Fixed Fixed links and minor docs as per David's review. Committed in: comm

[ASFCS40] Outstanding release blockers

Hi all, I wanted to highlight what's currently standing between us and another RC vote for 4.0.0-incubating. At this point, we are waiting on two major issues: - First, we need to come to consensus on the OVM support issues. Edison started a thread about that, so please speak up with your opini

Re: github.com/CloudStack

David, Belated +1 for the move. Thanks for doing it. On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:22 AM, David Nalley wrote: > This has sat for almost a week with no additional comments - I'll > assume lazy consensus and make this change. > > --David > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >> Da

[DOCS][DISCUSS] Some style / formatting issues in docs

Hey all, In going through the release notes I've found a number of style / formatting issues I wanted to bring up for discussion. - I've noticed a lot of instances where filenames are discussed, but the element is not used. Instead of writing something like "now open the file "foo"" it's *much

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-132) Mash up marvin into an interactive auto-completing API shell for CloudStack

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478983#comment-13478983 ] Rohit Yadav commented on CLOUDSTACK-132: Sebastien and Prasanna, both of them

Re: Review Request: Troubleshooting section in the Install Guide

> On Oct. 18, 2012, 11:07 a.m., David Nalley wrote: > > docs/en-US/cannot-add-hosts.xml, line 23 > > > > > > This is factually inaccurate per edison have sent a mail to Edison about this. > On Oct. 18, 2012, 11:07 a.m

new committer: Gavin Lee

The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Gavin Lee to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This s

Re: Review Request: Fix for Defect-344 (location for many of the cloud-* tools is updated)

> On Oct. 18, 2012, 10:30 a.m., David Nalley wrote: > > I just tried with the latest iteration and it still isn't applying > > > > [ke4qqq@mba incubator-cloudstack]$ git am 344.patch > > Applying: fix for cloudstack-344 > > error: patch failed: docs/en-US/citrix-xenserver-installation.xml:21 >

Re: Review Request: Fix for Defect-344 (location for many of the cloud-* tools is updated)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7636/ --- (Updated Oct. 18, 2012, 12:26 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley,

Re: [4.1 feature RFC] Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone

On 17/10/12 10:42 PM, "Alena Prokharchyk" wrote: >Murali, some comments: > >1) "During network design phase of network creation, 'Direct network >Guru' which designs the shared networks shall setup the network to be in > Network.State.Allocated if shared network is being created in advanced >zone

Re: github.com/CloudStack

This has sat for almost a week with no additional comments - I'll assume lazy consensus and make this change. --David On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > David, I have looped in our VP of Brand Management to assist us here. > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:21 PM, David Nalley wr

[jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-372) Auto provision of hosts(hypervisors) into cloud using auto discovery mechanism from the specified IP address range

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13478909#comment-13478909 ] David Nalley commented on CLOUDSTACK-372: - Please bring this up in a discussio

Re: Review Request: Troubleshooting section in the Install Guide

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7645/#review12562 --- docs/en-US/cannot-add-hosts.xml

Re: Review Request: Fix for Defect-344 (location for many of the cloud-* tools is updated)

> On Oct. 18, 2012, 10:30 a.m., David Nalley wrote: > > I just tried with the latest iteration and it still isn't applying > > > > [ke4qqq@mba incubator-cloudstack]$ git am 344.patch > > Applying: fix for cloudstack-344 > > error: patch failed: docs/en-US/citrix-xenserver-installation.xml:21 >

Re: Review Request: Fix for Defect-344 (location for many of the cloud-* tools is updated)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7636/#review12560 --- I just tried with the latest iteration and it still isn't applying

RE: CS 4 Trial - Where to configure redundant virtual router?

Hi, I am using CloudStack-oss-4.0.0-701.tar oss rhel 6.3 build. I am able to view "Redundant router capability" check box with Source NAT Provider as Virtual Router. This check box is in the same place as 3.0 UI. Thanks, Sailaja.M -Original Message- From: Alex Jiang [mailto:alex.j

Re: Review Request: Fix for Defect-344 (location for many of the cloud-* tools is updated)

> On Oct. 17, 2012, 10:34 p.m., David Nalley wrote: > > This no longer cleanly applies to master. (And the scope of changes is far > > beyond CS-344 anyway) Attaching a new patch that cleanly applies. Changed the path from /usr/lib64/cloud/agent/scripts to /usr/lib64/cloud/common/scripts

Re: Review Request: Fix for Defect-344 (location for many of the cloud-* tools is updated)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7636/ --- (Updated Oct. 18, 2012, 8:12 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley,

Review Request: Troubleshooting section in the Install Guide

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7645/ --- Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, Jessica Tomechak, and