> Subject: RE: cloud-setup-databases build 756
> 
> That is true, but it does not seem to change once a zone is deployed. So if
> that 'undocumented' step is missed,

Jessica, I think changing cluster.node.IP field should have documented in 
chapters of setting up clustered mgmt servers. Am I right?


 the user needs to start redeploy the db
> with 'cloud-setup-databases cloud:password@127.0.0.1" (no deploy-as) and
> then reconfigure db.properties, and re-run "cloud-setup-management" .
> 
> Kinda crazy and lengthy method. (Undocumented)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Zhang [mailto:frank.zh...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:35 PM
> To: CloudStack dev list
> Subject: RE: cloud-setup-databases build 756
> 
> You can change the ip after running the script Go got
> /etc/cloud/management/db.properties, see cluster.node.IP field.
> Tough, having a CLI option would be a nice to have feature
> 
> From: Kelcey Damage (BBITS) [mailto:kel...@bbits.ca]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 2:19 PM
> To: CloudStack dev list
> Subject: cloud-setup-databases build 756
> 
> When running cloud-setup-databases, it auto chooses the highest priority
> nic(lowest number ie: eth0) for:
> 
> “Detected local IP address as 192.168.1.187, will use as cluster management
> server node IP[ OK ]”
> 
> Would it be possible to provide a new command line argument for
> establishing host? Such as: –host {ipaddr}
> 
> This would make complex deployment architectures easier to implement. It
> is also quite common to have multiple nics on the management server.
> 
> Is this feasible? Or too much work? Should I submit it as a bug?
> 
> [cid:image001.png@01CDAD39.F8411B90]Kelcey Damage Infrastructure
> Systems Architect
> www.backbonetechnology.com<http://www.backbonetechnology.com/>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> kel...@bbits.ca<mailto:kel...@bbits.ca>
> 
> address: 55 East 7th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5T 1M4
> tel: +1 604 713 8560 ext:114
> fax: +1 604 605 0964
> skype: kelcey.damage
> 
> 

Reply via email to