Hey Alena,
Why would we want to explicitly add a vlan for "isolated" networks without
source nat service? The guest IP allocator works for that scenario and the
network is not supposed to be shared. I'm actively working with this part of
the code as currently the some of the create code explici
Hi David,
Here is the readme file that Jessica created for generating various book set
from the XML files.
The readme has the complete information on generating different book sets by
appropriately declaring in the .cfg file.
Regards
-Radhika
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [m
Nice! Gefeliciteerd Wido :-)
-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:11 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: New PPMC member: Wido den Hollander
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack ha
Kelven, Thanks for pointing out this, and yes this is getting complicated when
volume states/ownership changes, we need some feature level discussion here.
For following scenarios I need some suggestions:
a) 'vm snapshot, detach volume and attach it to another VM, rollback snapshot',
b) 'vm sna
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:58 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:37:05PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> Hi folks.
>>
>> I experienced a problem today building the docs set now that we have
>> an entity in place. The problem that I found was: (building with
>> --format=test succeed
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6463/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Licensing clean-up in the do
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:47:25AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> Looking at the Publican docs, symlinking a Doc_name.ent to cloudstack.ent
>> (or something like that) seems like the only sensible option open to us.
>> The Publican docs have a
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6285/#review10008
---
Any other comments or issues that I can address?
I'd like get this in
I'm at home, don't have access to the copy I cloned yesterday, but
wouldn't this have been in there being that the date is May 24? Or was
it committed in a branch that was merged (sorry, not super versed in
git). At any rate, I'll give it a shot tomorrow, just wanted to look
at the change.
This do
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6462/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
License clean-up in the docs
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6461/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Clean-up in docs folder. Add
If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more than happy
to help :)
- Brett
On 08/08/2012, at 4:32 AM, Adrian Cole wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Maven is much easier to support than the current process. Gradle (if ever)
> could be done later. Also, there are folks like
@Prasanna:
Sorry, but i'm still at lost here.
1. Does this mean you can only ssh to the vm using private key method? I used
onapp before, and there are 2 ways to ssh a vm : first is using this private
key method, the second is just ssh the ip address, you will then login using
root, and onapp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6460/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
License clean-up in the docs
Thanks All
It's an honor to be a committer of CloudStack, and here is my brief
introduction:
After graduation, I've spent several years as an engineer in Trendmicro
developing security related products.
In 2010, as a development manager I joined TCloud Computing, a startup company
based in Bei
@edison :
"That comes from libvirt, this error means: there is already a disk with "vdb"
in libvirt's internal meta data, then the agent
Attaches the device with the same id "vdb" to the VM, then failed."
Do you have any idea for the solution? does this mean that data of the volume
somehow stil
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:j...@zonker.net]
> Sent: 07 August 2012 18:58
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DOCS: problems with using entities
>
>[Snip]
>
> I don't think it'll matter what the publican.cfg declares as long as the XML
> files
On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:12 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:42 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: where features are developed was: Review Request: Merge
>> Kelven's VPC co
Yup, I've seen that lack of attention. Hence my interest in what
other incubation projects are dealing with.
- chip
Sent from my iPhone.
On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:51 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, Aug
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:47:25AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> Looking at the Publican docs, symlinking a Doc_name.ent to cloudstack.ent
> (or something like that) seems like the only sensible option open to us.
> The Publican docs have a long rant about how what we are doing is evil,
> but I d
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:37:05PM -0400, David Nalley wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I experienced a problem today building the docs set now that we have
> an entity in place. The problem that I found was: (building with
> --format=test succeeds, but specifying a real output fails complaining
> about not
LVM has its own problems, no cluster(you need CLVM), no thin provision, no
delta snapshot, no snapshot chain, etc. I can list a long list for its
limitation...
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Patton [mailto:mpat...@inforelay.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 6:17 PM
> To: cloud
I would kill for block based snapshots and source virtual disks instead of the
apparent penchant for doing everything as files on a filesystem. How can it be
that hard to use LVM snaps?
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
> You can use SDN (Software Defined Networking). Salvatore sent some mails
> about the work he had done which got to a beta state. It sets up zone-wide
> L2 overlay networks using GRE tunnels. Salvatore's work was XenServer
> specific and us
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Matthew Patton wrote:
> When you host more than a few customers who rightfully expect their traffic
> to be private you quickly run out of physical network cards.
We dont and im sure others dont have customers, requiring private
traffic as a requirement, as client
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> If there is no VLAN, then it's not "advanced networking".
> Put in another way, what's the benefits using "advanced networking" instead
> of "basic networking"?
Basic networking doesnt allow multiple guest networks per vm
>
>> -Original Mes
SDN is more or less an alternative for vlans, which he doesn't want to use
anyway. He has separate network segments already.
There isn't very much good documentation for cloudstack networking. I
wanted to do something similar a few months back and ended up frustrated. I
had vlans, but wanted my VM
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6449/#review10005
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- edison su
On Aug. 7, 2012, 8:27 p.m., Andy Gr
When you host more than a few customers who rightfully expect their traffic to
be private you quickly run out of physical network cards.
You don't need fancy switches. Even the 100 dollar specials do VLANs. Only if
you want to en force selective separation will you need to shell out the
princel
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 5:47 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: DOCS: problems with using entities
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6458/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kelven Yang.
Description
---
A new vmware
The ability to deploy SG in advance zone is not put in simply due to timing
constraints. We do want to get to it but currently this is not part of
cloudstack.
If you don't need SG at all, then you should be able to deploy a share network
in advance zone where vlan is not required at all.
--Al
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 5:21 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: FWIW: Incubating projects and licensing
>
> FWIW:
>
> There's a timely thread happening over on general@incubator.a.o
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:37 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: DOCS: problems with using entities
>
> Hi folks.
>
> I experienced a problem today building the docs set now that we have
> an ent
>
> Do people run Fedora on production platforms? Isn't CentOS/RHEL the
> distribution for production and Fedora for Desktops and cutting edge test
> machines?
I saw some asks for Fedora particularly before RHEL 5.6 (or perhaps 5.5) came
out, when KVM support in RHEL was quite old/poor. Since t
You can use SDN (Software Defined Networking). Salvatore sent some mails about
the work he had done which got to a beta state. It sets up zone-wide L2
overlay networks using GRE tunnels. Salvatore's work was XenServer specific
and used a controller native to CloudStack. Hugo has done some co
Thanks. Hopefully it's fixed now.
--Alex
> -Original Message-
> From: Ewan Mellor [mailto:ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 5:28 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: unit-test failures due to changes in ComponentLocator
>
> Alex,
>
> The fol
Alex,
The following changeset seems to have caused three new unit test failures:
commit 1d3a443237f2f3d5bb4d2bc801860c41a6c46830
Author: Alex Huang
Date: Mon Jul 9 10:25:14 2012 -0700
Added support for component libraries in plugins
http://jenkins.cloudstack.org/job/junit-test/176/testRe
FWIW:
There's a timely thread happening over on general@incubator.a.o that
relates to us in a way...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201208.mbox/%3ccaofyjnyhzu2tn2e4ckpvtbazhvgtdnpx6cnkwuqejh3hxym...@mail.gmail.com%3E
It's worth watching, so that we avoid any issues th
As of the requirement of VM Snapshot feature. Following feature may also
be needed
- Export a VM snapshot into OVA
- Import OVA into CloudStack (this feature is not truly related with
snapshot but make backup and restore at VM basis useful)
>
> - Does not conflict with volume snapshot
>
For this
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:42 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: where features are developed was: Review Request: Merge
> Kelven's VPC code for Vmware into asf vpc branch
>
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2
If you're going to put this on cloudstack-users, please cc cloudstack-dev too.
-users has 300 mails a month -- I'll something important if it's only on there.
Ewan.
> -Original Message-
> From: akaras...@gmail.com [mailto:akaras...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
> Alex Karasulu
> Sent: Tuesday
On 8/7/12 4:45 PM, "David Nalley" wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
> wrote:
>> There were couple of changes introduced to the cloudStack VPC feature:
>>
>> 1) Added global config parameter + new resource limit for account/domain
>> controlling maximum number of VPCs accou
Edison (others),
I'd love if you would give the devcloud "build process" a try. I
combined your veewee stuff, with puppet manifests that build a base
box, and then are used whenever devcloud is started from vagrant.
Basic instructions are here:
To build a "devcloud base box", run you need a sys
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:03 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday my patch for building libvirt-java Debian packages got
> committed[0], so both RPM[1] and DEB[2] packages are available.
>
> Since the licensing for libvirt-java is still a problem we should be able to
> have the RPM and
Congrats, Mice!
On Aug 7, 2012, at 4:13 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Mice Xia to become a committer and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
I think that in practical terms, these patches would be module by
module, not author by author. Ex: API changes as 1 patch, and UI
changes as another. I think that approach works better for the
committers too, since we've already broken the CS modules into areas
of "maintainer responsibility".
It's been fixed commit: 0ec679c359bfaf8ec43a80fcbc5c617f6c74cab9
Can you get the latest code and rebuild the system iso, copy iso to hypervisor
host, then stop/start ssvm.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 3:57 PM
>
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:38 PM, David Nalley wrote:
>>
>> (Disclaimer: nofi!)
>>
>> Do people run Fedora on production platforms? Isn't CentOS/RHEL the
>> distribution for production and Fedora for Desktops and cutting edge test
>> machines?
>>
>> Wido
>
> You might be surprised. Even I am surpris
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Alena Prokharchyk
wrote:
> There were couple of changes introduced to the cloudStack VPC feature:
>
> 1) Added global config parameter + new resource limit for account/domain
> controlling maximum number of VPCs account/domain can have.
> 2) Added global config para
If there is no VLAN, then it's not "advanced networking".
Put in another way, what's the benefits using "advanced networking" instead of
"basic networking"?
> -Original Message-
> From: Outback Dingo [mailto:outbackdi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 4:29 PM
> To: cloudstac
Chip , thanks for this proposal, I like 1 and 2. On #3, are you assuming that
in the event a team of committers and non-committers are working on a large
feature, the changesets for the feature will be applied incrementally into the
Apache repo by one of the committers? If that is the case th
>
> (Disclaimer: nofi!)
>
> Do people run Fedora on production platforms? Isn't CentOS/RHEL the
> distribution for production and Fedora for Desktops and cutting edge test
> machines?
>
> Wido
You might be surprised. Even I am surprised at some of the folks using
Fedora in production for their com
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/2012 11:01 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>
>>
>> The point David also made is the question: Which platforms are we going
>>> to
>>> build binaries for?
>>>
>>> To put it in a simple way: "The agent is nothing more then a couple o
Wrapping broke the link (below). Here it is, in its entirety...
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/RelOps/Inter-VLAN+Routing+functional+spec
Eric Pretorious
Truckee, CA
>
> From: Alena Prokharchyk
>To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
>
>Sent: Tuesday,
Just a curiosity, wonder if there way any way to allow advanced
networking without using VLANS
I get the security concept, though i question their use in certain
configurations and that not everyone
can afford the high end switches required to maintain a VLAN network.
Simply put, we should be
given
Congrats Wido!
On Aug 7, 2012, at 4:10 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
> has asked Wido to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
> announce that they have accepted.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Wido!
>
> --David
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Mice Xia to become a committer and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since
there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This sh
The Podling Project Management Committee (PPMC) for Apache CloudStack
has asked Wido to become a member of the PPMC and we are pleased to
announce that they have accepted.
Please join me in congratulating Wido!
--David
on behalf of the CloudStack PPMC
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 1:21 AM, Mice Xia wrote:
> David,
>
> Translation done for zh-CN, verified with publican. Please help commit po
> files.
>
> Regards
> Mice
Committed.
Thanks for all of the work.
--David
I think the key here is to be as inclusive as possible. Plus do you really
want another list to have to manage? Users is probably the superset list.
Let there be chatter around events! It's a good thing IMHO.
-A
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> XenServerJava:
>> Ewan noted that the Citrix team is currently working to get this
>> re-licensed.
>> Ewan - any update on progress?
>> incubator-cloudstack/deps/XenServerJava/GPL-2
>> incubator-cloudstack/deps/XenServerJava/Makef
hacked a fix by editing /var/cache/cloud/cmdline in the ssvm to use
NfsSecondaryStorageResource. Now I hit
"http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15143";, x != java.lang.String,
not sure if this is a regression or due to my hack.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Edison,
>
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> That makes a lot of sense to me, thanks Chip.
>
> For those public repos for non-committers, I presume that they can't use
> Apache infrastructure, so Github would be the natural choice. We have a
> mirror there now (as of last week) so peopl
Hi folks.
I experienced a problem today building the docs set now that we have
an entity in place. The problem that I found was: (building with
--format=test succeeds, but specifying a real output fails complaining
about not being able to locate an entity.)
Joe has begun working around this by sp
Edison,
I'm having trouble testing my patch against incubator-cloudstack.
Every indication seems to be that it's working, but the secondary
storage VM seems to be messed up. I found this:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02431.html
Which you commented on, I ju
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6450/#review9995
---
Ship it!
works for me
- David Nalley
On Aug. 7, 2012, 9:35 p.m., J
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6450/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Ongoing license clean-up in
On 08/07/2012 11:01 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
The point David also made is the question: Which platforms are we going to
build binaries for?
To put it in a simple way: "The agent is nothing more then a couple of JAR
files which need to be run with JSVC and it needs the libvirt-java bindings to
> The point David also made is the question: Which platforms are we going to
> build binaries for?
>
> To put it in a simple way: "The agent is nothing more then a couple of JAR
> files which need to be run with JSVC and it needs the libvirt-java bindings to
> talk to a recent version of libvirt
That makes a lot of sense to me, thanks Chip.
For those public repos for non-committers, I presume that they can't use Apache
infrastructure, so Github would be the natural choice. We have a mirror there
now (as of last week) so people can clone and work there. How does that sound?
Regarding
Hugo,
Sorry, completely missed this scenario. When I referred to ip allocation
in Isolated network in my email, I meant Isolated network with Source Nat
service.
IP allocation for Isolated network with no source Nat falls under the same
rules Shared network follows. Both these networks used to be
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2012 12:59 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Release Management Process
>
> This may be presumptuous (both for myself and for the project's
> readiness to release)
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 12:06 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Added NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files to the root
>> dir
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 12:06 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Added NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files to the root
> directory
>
> I've taken the step to add NOTICE, LICENSE and
Hey Alena,
Thanks for the explanation, but in my case the network that I'm creating is an
isolated network without a SourceNat offering.
So it should not need have an ip allocated from the public ip table as it is
isolated. It is also not a VLAN but a 'direct' network as it is provisioned by
t
Seems you are using the networkoffering.
In order to add network into basic zone, needs to choose
DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService or (DefaultSharedNetworkOffering and
displaytext = "Offering for Shared networks")
See the code in
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-cloud
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6449/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
(low priority review, I'm tr
There were couple of changes introduced to the cloudStack VPC feature:
1) Added global config parameter + new resource limit for account/domain
controlling maximum number of VPCs account/domain can have.
2) Added global config parameter controlling max number of Guest networks
per VPC
All the co
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> XenServerJava:
>> Ewan noted that the Citrix team is currently working to get this
>> re-licensed.
>> Ewan - any update on progress?
>> incubator-cloudstack/deps/XenServerJava/GPL-2
>> incubator-cloudstack/deps/XenServerJava/Makef
On 08/07/2012 08:26 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
Maybe we can switch to Ubuntu 12.04?:
VMware supports it:
http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/Ubuntu_12_04.html
Xen/KVM supports it by default.
My recollection is that we picked
Applied.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6447/
>
> Ship it!
>
> Ship It!
>
>
> - Chip
>
> On August 7th, 2012, 8:08 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> Review request for cloudstack.
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6447/#review9988
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On Aug. 7, 2012, 8:08 p.m., Joe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6447/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Ongoing license clean-up in
Applied. Thanks Joe!
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6446/#review9987
> --
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6446/#review9987
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On Aug. 7, 2012, 7:47 p.m., Joe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6446/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Ongoing license clean-up in
Hi,
While testing cloudbridge using devcloud, I have decided to write a script to
re-create the setup using the API.
I think I could use marvin to do that, but It's also a good way to learn the
api..
The basic script I have so far is at: http://paste.cloudstack.org/IBF5/
When I try to create t
> XenServerJava:
> Ewan noted that the Citrix team is currently working to get this
> re-licensed.
> Ewan - any update on progress?
> incubator-cloudstack/deps/XenServerJava/GPL-2
> incubator-cloudstack/deps/XenServerJava/Makefile
I'm not certain if there's been discussion on why th
Applied to master.
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6441/#review9984
> -
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6441/#review9984
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On Aug. 7, 2012, 7:04 p.m., Joe
I've taken the step to add NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER files to the
root directory. The NOTICE and LICENSE files need to be populated for
all external licenses that we are using.
Starting to go down the path of getting those files in shape, I
started to take a look through the dependencies wik
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6441/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Adds Apache license to all t
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Alessandro Pilotti wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have some trouble with NFS to access the secondary storage as we are
> targetting Hyper-V server which, unlike Windows Server, doesn't have a native
> NFS client.
>
> How hard do you guys think it would be to add CIFS as
+1 (non-binding)
Maven is much easier to support than the current process. Gradle (if ever)
could be done later. Also, there are folks like me that want to use
components of cloudstack as libraries w dependencies and the current
process is not catered towards that. Maven would.
-A
On Aug 7, 20
I've heard good things about Gradle, and "because everyone else is doing it" is
rarely a good justification for choosing technologies, but it seems Maven is
the de facto standard for most Apache (and other open source) projects. If
integrating Cloudstack in other environments or extending Clou
> -Original Message-
> From: Edison Su [mailto:edison...@citrix.com]
>
> Maybe we can switch to Ubuntu 12.04?:
> VMware supports it:
> http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/Ubuntu_12_04.html
> Xen/KVM supports it by default.
My recollection is that we picked Debian for stability and security.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:w...@widodh.nl]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 7:35 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Detection of available Qemu emulators
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently upgraded to libvirt 0.10-rc1 and stumbled upon the problem
>
On 8/7/12 6:14 AM, "Hugo Trippaers" wrote:
>Heya,
>
>I'm trying to get my head around something and would welcome some
>feedback.
>
>The use case I'm currently working with is related to internal networks.
>I have serveral use cases that call for internal networks that have no
>connection to the
Awesome, thank you - will do.
- Andy
--
Andy Gross @argv0
Chief Architect
Basho Technologies, Inc
On Aug 7, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Thanks for the patch Andy.
>
> I've applied to the master branch. Can you please go ahead and mark
> that review as closed / submitted?
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
