If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more than happy to help :)
- Brett On 08/08/2012, at 4:32 AM, Adrian Cole <adrian.f.c...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Maven is much easier to support than the current process. Gradle (if ever) > could be done later. Also, there are folks like me that want to use > components of cloudstack as libraries w dependencies and the current > process is not catered towards that. Maven would. > > -A > On Aug 7, 2012 11:27 AM, "Andy Gross" <a...@andygross.org> wrote: > >> >> I've heard good things about Gradle, and "because everyone else is doing >> it" is rarely a good justification for choosing technologies, but it seems >> Maven is the de facto standard for most Apache (and other open source) >> projects. If integrating Cloudstack in other environments or extending >> Cloudstack are important for developers and users, Maven might be the >> easiest way to go. >> >> Just my .02. >> >> - Andy >> >> >> >> On Aug 3, 2012, at 5:00 PM, Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Gradle seems to be another >>> http://www.gradle.org/ >>> >>> >>> Since it is allows scripting (as opposed to configuration xml), it could >>> potentially fulfill the waf role as well. >>> Anybody have any experience with Gradle? >>> >>> On 7/24/12 2:19 PM, "Alex Huang" <alex.hu...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Just out of curiosity, have tools like Ivy and maven been ever >>>>> considered for >>>>> dependency management? >>>> >>>> We are looking at these two tools. Our first thoughts is devs should be >>>> able to start projects that are tied to other parts of their code so we >>>> want this to be as flexible as possible. Maven forces too much of a >>>> structure on to the developers. Ivy seems like the right tool to go >>>> with. Any comments? >>>> >>>> --Alex >>>> >>> >> >> -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter http://twitter.com/brettporter
