---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6245/#review9677
---
It looks fine to me as well.
Thanks,
Deepak
- Deepak Garg
On Aug
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6245/#review9676
---
Ship it!
Verified the changes on my set up. Looks good !
Thanks for t
Hi, folks,
I noticed there is a global configuration ‘encode.api.response’ with default
value ‘false’, its description says it’s about UTF-8 encoding.
But configuring it to ‘true’ does not change the encoding of response, it
actually does a URLEncode, like replacing space with %20;
And X
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6245/
---
(Updated Aug. 1, 2012, 4:21 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Pranav Saxena,
@edison :
Okay i have follow the instructions from your link. Does this mean i have to
submit bug to bugs.cloudstack.org also? (i upload agent.log on pastebin.com for
now)
- I use KVM Host Cent OS 6.2
- my libvirt version is 0.9.4
- Here is my agent.log : http://pastebin.com/Lm5GZymR
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:56 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> That said, it's important to establish that the image isn't an
> official release of the project.
Agreed.
> Perhaps your people.apache.org space
> - though I'd certainly ask in #asfinfra before I DDoSed people.a.o :)
It's actually a bit mor
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6268/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle, Jessica Wang, and Olga Smola.
Desc
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Alex Huang wrote:
>> So currently, there are three ways for a patch to be received:
>> 1. Email (see the workflow Wido proposed) 2. Reviewboard 3. Submitted
>> with a bug.
>>
>> Email and ReviewBoard are the most visible, and it seems most people are
>> using Revi
> So currently, there are three ways for a patch to be received:
> 1. Email (see the workflow Wido proposed) 2. Reviewboard 3. Submitted
> with a bug.
>
> Email and ReviewBoard are the most visible, and it seems most people are
> using ReviewBoard rather than email.
We should remove the email and
On Jul 31, 2012, at 6:56 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Chip Childers
mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com>> wrote:
Does anyone know if there is an appropriate place within the ASF
infrastructure to be generating / hosting files that are around ~500
GB? If I don't hear fro
s/GB/MB
Doh!
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:56 PM, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Chip Childers
> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know if there is an appropriate place within the ASF
>> infrastructure to be generating / hosting files that are around ~500
>> GB? If I don't hear from
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Being based in Sydney, I tend to get a lot of list traffic in one big lump
> when I wake up. Looking at cloudstack-commits today, there are 139 messages -
> most of which are a result of git branch merges. This has been the situation
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> Does anyone know if there is an appropriate place within the ASF
> infrastructure to be generating / hosting files that are around ~500
> GB? If I don't hear from anyone in a day or two, I'll open a ticket
500GB
Not all of us work for
Sold, thanks John.
We're scheduled to finish the general development phase on Friday 10 August, so
some time between Friday afternoon and Monday morning we should create a
release branch and bump all the version numbers to some "4.0 prerelease" number.
Cheers,
Ewan.
> -Original Message---
I have this working end to end now:
1 - veewee to build a base Ubuntu VM - (I saw this config in the repo
Edison, and just started using it as our starting point for the
overall process)
2 - vagrant / puppet to apply the devcloud pre-config to that base ubuntu box
3 - export of a new "box" based on
Fantastic Arve! Thanks for pitching in.
-chip
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:13 PM, Arve Paalsrud
wrote:
> This code snippet is written by Jacob Gilley in a forum thread over at F5 Dev
> Central in 2005, and not F5 Network themselves. F5's version and the original
> code are identical - they've o
happy to volunteer
On Jul 31, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
Presumably someone knows how CloudStack's version and build numbers relate to
each other (wrt upgrade etc). Can I please have a volunteer?
We need to set appropriate version numbers when we branch for 4.0 (i.e some
kind of 4.0-
Applied to master.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:14 PM, Chip Childers
wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6266/#review9672
>
Presumably someone knows how CloudStack's version and build numbers relate to
each other (wrt upgrade etc). Can I please have a volunteer?
We need to set appropriate version numbers when we branch for 4.0 (i.e some
kind of 4.0-pre), then we will need to set the proper numbers for the release
c
This code snippet is written by Jacob Gilley in a forum thread over at F5 Dev
Central in 2005, and not F5 Network themselves. F5's version and the original
code are identical - they've only added the copyright statements and optional
GPL, so I've reached out to Jacob and asked if he's willing to
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6266/#review9672
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Chip Childers
On Aug. 1, 2012, 1:12 a.m., Ewan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6266/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Description
---
Make it possible to configur
+1 (non-binding and certainly not official) for taking the opportunity to
rewrite code as a chance to make things better, vs least efforts.
Code written more than several months prior can often be written better
anyway (one hopes their skills age well :P). Particularly, unit tests are
a welcome g
On 01/08/2012, at 6:52 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
> Does anyone know the official ASF stance on what it means to
> "re-write" a section of code?
There's no general answer to this - each case needs to be considered
separately. This was the closest I could find in the archives:
http://s.apache.org
Hi Alena,
test 721d3ef3dcd773d3e5b638f703e91456915393e6 with following setup, D for
domain, acct for account, N for network.
ROOT （N0, zone wide)
D1 (N1, domain wide)
acct1a
acct1u(N4, account-specific)
D2(N2, domain wide)
acct2a
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> Here's the refactored patch. The CLVM stuff is basically a copy of the
> RBD additions; and the patch also includes the original changes to
> managesnapshot.sh, which is unmodified.
>
> I'm personally more concerned about the core functiona
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> sure, just let me know how to send it in.
Go to reviews.apache.org
Create an account
Submit the patch - add the 'group' cloudstack
You should see it appear on the mailing list shortly thereafter.
--David
sure, just let me know how to send it in.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Edison Su wrote:
> Could you send the patch to reviewboard, and remove the snapshot part?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:09 PM
>> To:
Could you send the patch to reviewboard, and remove the snapshot part?
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 3:09 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: re-implement clvm
>
> Here's the refactored patc
Here's the refactored patch. The CLVM stuff is basically a copy of the
RBD additions; and the patch also includes the original changes to
managesnapshot.sh, which is unmodified.
I'm personally more concerned about the core functionality at this
point, I can go through and re-implement the snapshot
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could I get additional permissions on bugs.cloudstack.org so I'm able to
> resolve issues?
>
> I want to mark CS-15776 as resolved, but I don't seem to have the proper
> permissions.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Wido
DONE
Hi,
Could I get additional permissions on bugs.cloudstack.org so I'm able to
resolve issues?
I want to mark CS-15776 as resolved, but I don't seem to have the proper
permissions.
Thanks!
Wido
Hi folks,
Just a quick update on this. I created the deps-ctrl branch off of
master now that I actually have something to show.
If you take a look under deps you'll see it looks pretty bare. I've
removed a number of the jars.
There's also a few new ant targets you can use:
resolveBuildDeps: Thi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6200/#review9668
---
Ship it!
I didn't notice this review, but noticed the bug myself this
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 2:14 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: non-committer workflow
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:05 PM, sebgoa wrote:
> >
> > So Non-committers don't need to get an accou
The most complicated part in rommer's patch is LVM snapshot. If snapshot
support is not a must, then adding CLVM is simple as RBD.
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:33 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:05 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>
> So Non-committers don't need to get an account on RB and submit patches via
> that path ?
>
So currently, there are three ways for a patch to be received:
1. Email (see the workflow Wido proposed)
2. Reviewboard
3. Submitted with a bug.
Email a
On Jul 31, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> On 07/31/2012 10:24 PM, sebgoa wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since I am new to Cloudstack and Apache like projects, I was looking at the
>> process for submitting a very small patch (e.g typo, one-liner, license
>> header)
>
> Always welcome!
>
Does anyone know the official ASF stance on what it means to
"re-write" a section of code?
Specifically, I was looking at the F5 code [1] that was found during
license header changes (and is considered a release blocker bug [2]).
The code is actually quite trivial in nature, and I'm wondering what
Could you follow http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/KVM+agent+debug, then
upload agent.log to somewhere?
> -Original Message-
> From: Tommy Aditya Lawanto [mailto:to...@wowrack.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:26 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Fail
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6200/#review9663
---
fixed by Wido in da0db631d01e59b233da6da481eb8074c0f3891f
- edison su
On 07/31/2012 10:24 PM, sebgoa wrote:
Hi,
Since I am new to Cloudstack and Apache like projects, I was looking at the
process for submitting a very small patch (e.g typo, one-liner, license header)
Always welcome!
The wiki page on how to use git o contribute to Cloudstack has a section for
Ok, so I've created a refactored patch that seems to work. It was
pretty much entirely the RBD additions that were blocking the original
from being rolled back in. If a developer would be willing to take on
the whole license issue and see this functionality put back in I'd
still be willing to pay h
On 07/31/2012 10:12 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 07/31/2012 09:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
r
Hi,
Since I am new to Cloudstack and Apache like projects, I was looking at the
process for submitting a very small patch (e.g typo, one-liner, license header)
The wiki page on how to use git o contribute to Cloudstack has a section for
non-committer:
http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/Git
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 07/31/2012 09:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
>> is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
>> re-factoring would need to be done e
That's my problem too. I'm about 75% of the way through hacking my own
patch together, and it looks at least superficially like most of the
RBD code was based on the CLVM stuff (extra if statements added and
CLVM replaced with RBD). I'm comfortable with reusing this in my
environment, but getting i
On 07/31/2012 09:48 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
re-factoring would need to be done even if there were permission.
My hunch is that unless he's switched roles
I'd be happy to try more if I had access to any contact info. As it
is, things in the surrounding code have changed enough that a bit of
re-factoring would need to be done even if there were permission.
My hunch is that unless he's switched roles, once the new version is
released he may come out
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6239/#review9656
---
http://wiki.videolan.org/Git#Commit
- Rohit Yadav
On July 31, 2012,
Ewan, or anyone else that may be more familiar with the project,
Has any progress been made on your last point of coming up with a roadmap for
the next few releases? I'm really curious when we'll see the first Apache
released Cloudstack. Also on that point, will the next released version be
3
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Simon Weller wrote:
> I recall David Nalley collecting a Cloudstack/cloud.com ICLA from rommer for
> this contribution in Q4 of last year.
>
>
> David,
>
>
> Does the ICLA contain any contact information not available on the old
> cloudstack-devel list?
>
>
> - S
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 03:02:50 PM David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Kelven Yang
wrote:
> > I'd like to share some background information related to choice of
> > Vmware
> > SDK.
> >
> > Before I started Vmware integration project, both vi java and Vmware SDK
> > were bla
I recall David Nalley collecting a Cloudstack/cloud.com ICLA from rommer for
this contribution in Q4 of last year.
David,
Does the ICLA contain any contact information not available on the old
cloudstack-devel list?
- Si
- Original Message -
From: "Marcus Sorensen"
To: cloud
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Kelven Yang wrote:
> I'd like to share some background information related to choice of Vmware
> SDK.
>
> Before I started Vmware integration project, both vi java and Vmware SDK
> were black
> boxes to me, but one thing for sure is that Vmware SDK should not have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6226/#review9655
---
This bug is already fixed with 721d3ef3dcd773d3e5b638f703e91456915393e
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6245/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Pranav Saxena, Brian Federle, and Jessica Wang.
D
I'd like to share some background information related to choice of Vmware
SDK.
Before I started Vmware integration project, both vi java and Vmware SDK
were black
boxes to me, but one thing for sure is that Vmware SDK should not have any
blockers that could mask off raw vSphere functionality. Vi j
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:
> Hi...
>
>I was talking to David Nalley over IRC and we spotted two main tasks
> that we should put our focus on in the coming 1-2 months and
> more preferably the coming month:
>
> 1- Finishing the INFRA related tasks (namely JIRA)
http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-14521
I understand the licensing issues, but this is going to break the next
release for us (and has already broken our test environment). I'd like
to offer a bounty of $800 for a patch that re-implements CLVM. We'll
pay $200 for a working patch that applies to
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:39 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> 3. Continue on the license audit path. This is really two fold:
> * Search for files that need ASF license headers.
> * Verify that there are no prohibited licenses.
> * Define the pieces of software that require attribution in Notice f
> On July 31, 2012, 12:06 p.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > Ship It!
Edison, could you please review this as well? I haven't pushed the fix here.
- Prasanna
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://revie
> On July 31, 2012, 9:27 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > Bug Report: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15776
> >
> > Saw quite a few whitespace changes as well. Ran a pychecker on the patch
> > and it looks fine.
> >
> >
>
> Tomoe Sugihara wrote:
> Actually the bug report was simil
> On July 31, 2012, 9:27 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > Bug Report: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15776
> >
> > Saw quite a few whitespace changes as well. Ran a pychecker on the patch
> > and it looks fine.
> >
> >
>
> Tomoe Sugihara wrote:
> Actually the bug report was simil
Hi Vijay, are you also developing the corresponding ec2 auto-scale api
implementation ?
It would be nice if everytime a new feature is developed the corresponding aws
api (if it exsits) is also implemented at the same time.
-Sebastien
On Jul 27, 2012, at 11:17 AM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
>
> On July 31, 2012, 9:27 a.m., Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > Bug Report: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15776
> >
> > Saw quite a few whitespace changes as well. Ran a pychecker on the patch
> > and it looks fine.
> >
> >
Actually the bug report was similar but for a different review. I
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 10:23:03AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote:
> "we are working towards" / "there are outstanding issues that will
> have to be resolved in a short period of time"
>
> Basically, hedge it a little bit... ;-)
Oh, absolutely. My main concern is the appearance of radio silence while
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Chip Childers
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ewan Mellor
> wrote:
>> David Nalley, Pradeep Soundararajan, Chip Childers, and Edison Su are
>> working on sorting out our build dependencies, turning off things that
>> depend on non-Apache SDKs (libvirt
"we are working towards" / "there are outstanding issues that will
have to be resolved in a short period of time"
Basically, hedge it a little bit... ;-)
-chip
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:33:07AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:33:07AM +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After my draft release plan last week, I've taken the feedback that I got
> (thanks for that, everyone) and I think we're ready to commit to this plan
> now.
OK. I'm going to put something on the blog and forums today ab
+1
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2012 6:06 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: KVM code will be moved to plugin folder
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Wido den Hollander
> wrote:
> >
>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> On 07/31/2012 12:03 AM, Edison Su wrote:
>>
>> KVM code is moved to plugins/hypervisor/kvm, a new jar, cloud-kvm.jar is
>> created for all the java classes used by kvm code.
>
>
> Why cloud-kvm.jar? As KVM is also a plugin shouldn't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6229/#review9641
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Nitin Mehta
On July 31, 2012, 1 p.m., Koushik
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> David Nalley, Pradeep Soundararajan, Chip Childers, and Edison Su are working
> on sorting out our build dependencies, turning off things that depend on
> non-Apache SDKs (libvirt-java, mysql-connector-java, NetApp, F5, and VMware
> SDKs).
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6229/
---
(Updated July 31, 2012, 1 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Pra
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:59 PM, Adrian Cole wrote:
> (snip) despite lack of unit tests and sensible
> logging. (snip)
Well there are those issues... :-(
As you say, there really isn't another alternative out there though.
Beyond rolling our own (which I'm not in favor of), this is the best
op
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6237/#review9640
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Koushik Das
On July 31, 2012, 10:48 a.m., Rohi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6229/#review9638
---
server/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/dao/HypervisorCapabilitiesDaoImpl.jav
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6239/#review9639
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Prasanna Santhanam
On July 31, 2012, 11:33 a.m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6191/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Kavala.
Summary (updated)
-
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6239/
---
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
Description
---
Patch fixes fi
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:55:04PM -0400, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Kinsella [mailto:j...@stratosec.co]
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2012 1:30 PM
> > To:
> > Subject: Re: Please remember to close review board requests
> >
> > [Snip]
> >
> > The patch submitter
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6237/#review9636
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Kishan Kavala
On July 31, 2012, 10:48 a.m., Ro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6237/#review9635
---
Ship it!
Hugo - this might have been caused by 894407caa97ecd5b4f034d
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6237/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam.
Description
---
Patch
On 07/31/2012 12:03 AM, Edison Su wrote:
KVM code is moved to plugins/hypervisor/kvm, a new jar, cloud-kvm.jar is
created for all the java classes used by kvm code.
Why cloud-kvm.jar? As KVM is also a plugin shouldn't it be named
consistently like cloud-plugin-netapp.jar, cloud-plugin-f5.ja
Can we not provide the flexibility while adding a host. So when the admin adds
a host he has the provision of enabling/disabling local storage for that host.
I think that is the lowest level of granularity that we can provide to the
admin ?
Another question - With this feature would upload volu
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6227/#review9632
---
Ship it!
Bug Report: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15776
Saw
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6230/#review9630
---
Looks good to me. I have verified it on my set up too. I'll ask Jessic
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 04:41:03AM -0400, Tommy Aditya Lawanto wrote:
> Thank you guys for your help. I've successfully deployed a vm using
> the valid sshkeypair. Also, i am now able to get result from command
> "getVmPassword", here it is :
>
> [password] => Array
> (
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6230/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Pranav Saxena, Brian Federle, and Jessica Wang.
D
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6229/
---
(Updated July 31, 2012, 9:09 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan
Thank you guys for your help. I've successfully deployed a vm using the valid
sshkeypair. Also, i am now able to get result from command "getVmPassword",
here it is :
[password] => Array
(
[encryptedpassword]=>3wvuei3lBc93I9MRxbf1FsRLJjPJSdIzQWR6hd4u4UiZ9l
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6227/
---
Review request for cloudstack and edison su.
Description
---
Fix the agent
@edison :
i use CentOS 6.2.
I tried stop the vm, start it, then attach the volume => no good, it fail
Also try reboot, and then attach the volume => also fail
Then i try to just stop the vm, attach the volume, and then start the vm =>
surprisingly it works
After it works, i try to detach th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6226/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle, Jessica Wang, and Alena
Prokharchyk
On 07/30/2012 02:40 PM, David Nalley wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Koushik Das wrote:
Yes the idea is to have local storage setting at zone level. Currently it is a
global setting (use.local.storage).
-Koushik
Even zone-level seems too high - why isn't this at the cluster level
> On July 30, 2012, 3:27 p.m., John Kinsella wrote:
> > Tomoe - is there a bug filed for this? If not, can you create one?
Sure. Done: http://bugs.cloudstack.org/browse/CS-15776
- Tomoe
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
On 07/31/2012 02:32 AM, Kelcey Damage (BBITS) wrote:
It would be great if we could look at creating a system (even just a utility
script) that would allow us to re-attach a secondary storage server and
salvage existing templates housed on it.
I'm thinking it could crawl the template tree and
Hi Tommy,
Try generating a new key-pair using the api, createSSHKeyPair. And then use
the key-pair name you supplied for createSSHKeyPair as the value for parameter
keypair while deploying the VM. Hope it helps.
Thank you,
Likitha
-Original Message-
From: Tommy Aditya Lawanto [mailto:
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
