Re: Interest in a commercial IDE for Clojure?

2013-08-06 Thread ngieschen
I would absolutely pay for something like this. On Sunday, July 28, 2013 8:34:19 PM UTC-7, Colin Fleming wrote: > > Thanks for the thoughts, Matt - I agree it's a tough market for all the > reasons you describe. It's unfortunate that companies that pay for an > Ultimate license would have to pay

Re: Interest in a commercial IDE for Clojure?

2013-08-06 Thread ngieschen
tools for Intellij, but would prefer not to duplicate efforts. On Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:04:27 AM UTC-7, ngieschen wrote: > > I would absolutely pay for something like this. > > On Sunday, July 28, 2013 8:34:19 PM UTC-7, Colin Fleming wrote: >> >> Thanks for the th

Re: [Proposal] Simplified 'ns' declaration

2013-08-09 Thread ngieschen
Now that refer is part of require, I don't think the existing syntax is too hard for new comers. The only thing I would suggest is adding the ability to :rename to require. That is, now that :refer is in require, require can handle anything except :rename and :exclude. I'm not concerned with :e

Question on mapcat and its variable arity

2013-08-25 Thread ngieschen
I'm somewhat new to clojure and trying to understand mapcat, so apologies in advance if this is an embarrassingly elementary question. mapcat's signature is (f & colls) which indicates to me I should be able to so something like (mapcat #(list (inc %)) [1 2 3] [4 5 6]). That is, doesn't the & i

Re: Question on mapcat and its variable arity

2013-08-25 Thread ngieschen
Ahh, of course. Ouch, that was embarrassingly elementary. Thanks. On Sunday, August 25, 2013 3:13:12 PM UTC-7, Lee wrote: > > > On Aug 25, 2013, at 5:42 PM, ngieschen wrote: > > > > mapcat's signature is (f & colls) which indicates to me I should be able > to