, and C only works with Z v3.
Is there a straightforward way to load in both versions of Z to a single JVM,
and make everything work?
Perhaps this is the kind of situation that Gradle, OSGi, and probably other
tools/frameworks are meant to help address?
Thanks,
Andy
--
You received this me
you call (shutdown-agents) before the end of your program.
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-124
Andy
On May 7, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Muharem Hrnjadovic wrote:
> Hello there!
>
> I only started learning Clojure today, so please forgive me if this is
> a stupid question or something
ojure futures, I've added
examples to those two functions that recommend reading the examples for future.
Andy
On May 8, 2012, at 11:18 AM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> Not desired, but currently normal behavior.
>
> This happens whenever certain concurrency features of Clojure are used
clear or "least surprising" than any
of the others. Permitting only one makes that part of the behavior clear, at
least.
Andy
On May 15, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Hubert Iwaniuk wrote:
> I tried using if-let with multiple binding in past as well.
> Following least surprise principle,
Did you use the instructions under "Install & Start-up" on this page?
https://github.com/franks42/clj-ns-browser
Also, what OS are you using (and if Windows, are you using Cygwin, too?), and
what do you get as output of the command "lein version"?
Thanks,
Andy
On
argue that such auto-conversion of
types, while convenient in many cases in Perl, is also a source of errors in
programs.
Andy
On May 19, 2012, at 1:05 AM, Ankit Goel wrote:
> Thanks a lot for the help Meikel and Jim.
> @ Meikel: it worked great as per your suggestion.
>
> I was jus
tees you wanted from an
STM.
Andy
On May 29, 2012, at 3:08 PM, Edward Yang wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We're interested in using some of Clojure's internal libraries (in
> particular, it's STM implementation), in the runtime for another programming
> language. We
takes practice to get
faster at it, that is for sure.
Andy
On Jun 6, 2012, at 5:46 AM, Dave Sann wrote:
> Hi Stephen, thanks for the answer.
>
> Let me be more clear. I am porting the functionality, not the form of the
> code. I want to use pure clojure - because I'd lik
Hi,
So my questions is as in subject. I did a bit of research but could not
find a good answer.
Would appreciate an insight ...
(thank you 'Andy)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send e
I was wondering cause we can do all awesome stuff like that:
user=> (last "abc")
\c
user=> (first "abc")
\a
user=> (map (fn[z] (str z "-")) "abc")
("a-" "b-" "c-")
but this renders false
user=> (coll? "abc")
false
A.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
On 06/07/2012 09:22 PM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant wrote:
Every Seqable is not Sequential.
(sequential? {:a 1}) => false
Is there a simple test for sequable?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to cloju
etween-Clojure-hosts regex
implementation and adds that to clojure.string? That seems like a fairly big
chunk of code, even if you implement "only" what Java regexes have, and avoid
making it better in its Unicode support. It also adds yet another slightly
different regex implementation to th
Does this do what you want?
(defn require-from-string [s]
(require (symbol s)))
Andy
On Jun 8, 2012, at 5:37 PM, Leandro Oliveira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What is the best way to implement require-from-string?
>
> Ex:
>
> # require-from-string words like require but accepts
Hi,
I am looking for a way to express following function in Clojure:
scala> scanLeft(List(1,2,3))(0)(_ + _)
res1: List[Int] = List(0, 1, 3, 6)
Any insight?
Andy ...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this grou
thx, I see it now.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group,
not compelling at
all. Bottom line, I want to have a idiomatic Clojure solution ... Any
insight
Thx,
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts fr
Nice. But I wonder if sorting and (count coll) actually forces the
algorithm to load everything into memory. My Clojure solution is more
convoluted (will post it later) and suffers the same due to a
recursive algorithm doing the transformation I described at the end.
However I think I have someth
forgot full listing:
scala> List[Int](6, 7, 8, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 11, 10 ,11 ,12 ,13,
| 3).foldLeft(List[List[Int]]()){(a,b)=>
| if(a.isEmpty) List(List(b))
| else if(a.last.last < b) a.dropRight(1):::List(a.last:+b)
| else a:::List(List(b))
|
}.filter(_.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:05 AM, JuanManuel Gimeno Illa
wrote:
> My solution:
>
> (defn lis [s]
> (->> s
> (partition 2 1)
> (partition-by (partial apply <=))
> (filter (fn [[[a b]]] (< a b)))
> (reduce (fn [m s] (if (> (count s) (count m)) s m)) [])
> (#(cons
>
> (defn lis [coll]
> (or (->> coll
> (partition-between (partial apply >=))
> (sort-by (comp - count))
> (filter next)
> (first))
> []))
Totally agree on decomposing the problem into a single independent
steps. This is what I did not like about
ns to macro invocations.
I suspect Jim's concern would be addressed if the documentation for doto were
made more accurate, e.g. in the sentence:
"Evaluates x then calls all of the methods and functions with the value of x
supplied at the front of the given arguments."
replace t
I highly recommend clojuredocs.org for adding examples of pitfalls/traps. I've
added several there myself, e.g. for clojure.core/future (and also
clojure.core/pmap, clojure.java.shell/sh):
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/future
It takes only a few minutes to do so.
Andy
e noticeably slower on Windows XP + Cygwin than
the same operations on Mac OS X or Ubuntu Linux. I don't know the reasons for
this, but it is a very obvious difference.
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post
Hi,
I have been subscribed to a couple of groups as well as other stuff
and find it useful to have a Subject line prefix indicating the source
of conversation.
Would it be possible to add something like that [clojure]
Thx,
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
ble and want to use it, put it in your own local library and use it
(or make your own local modified version of Clojure for your own use).
Andy
On Jun 18, 2012, at 12:07 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> JIRA - http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ (since this is a "core"
> Clojure na
to split the traffic by group in some automated fashion
...
Cheers,
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please
So I followed the steps and it did not work:
> 3) This will automatically create a filter on words:
> list:""
however after changing filter to >>Matches:
to:(clojure.googlegroups.com) Do this: Apply label "clojure"<< all
seems to be just fine and I
> Oh, and I also believe training is mostly a waste of resources. Training is
> pushing information.
It really depends how it is constructed. If it is a domain knowledge -
this is just a info push. If this is a skill to be acquired - I have
seen many hands on dedicated labs very effective.
Now
to the list ...
Any simple ideas?
Thx,
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post
I know, but this is list :-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from th
do one
of the above. That can be anywhere on the scale of amazingly quick & easy, to
incredibly frustrating & hard, depending upon your ideas, how persuasive you
are, and who reads your arguments.
Andy
On Jun 28, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Warren Lynn wrote:
> Here is "another lang
making
backwards-incompatible changes as they become more widely used.
Andy
On Jun 28, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Warren Lynn wrote:
> Andy:
>
> Thanks for laying out the options to move it forward. I think those functions
> belong to clojure.core, but I will see how persuasive I am, or h
There are links to older discussions on this topic in the description of ticket
CLJ-703:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-703
Also proposed patches to Clojure, although I don't know whether some of those
may lead to incorrect behavior.
Andy
On Jul 16, 2012, at 12:48 PM, Raju B
"Modifying" the map pointed to
by the ref merely means that the pointer is changed from pointing to one
immutable map, to pointing at a different immutable map. Neither of the two
maps becomes mutable as a result of this.
Andy
On Aug 10, 2012, at 9:21 AM, Hussein B. wrote:
> Hi,
&
namic programming methods that work faster if the sum of the
numbers is small enough, but require holding in memory an array of at least N
bits, where N is the target.
Andy
On Aug 14, 2012, at 4:17 PM, John Holland wrote:
> I thought of doing something like that, but part of the requirements
I've added some examples of :when and :while, including those given by Herwig
and Tassilo in this thread, at ClojureDocs:
http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_core/clojure.core/for
Note: Anyone with a free account can add/edit examples on that site.
Andy
On Aug 21, 2012, at 8:34 AM, nico
of effort), regex-dna, and
binary-trees problems.
Andy
On Aug 27, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Ben Mabey wrote:
> Looking at clojure's benchmarks they seem to already be highly optimized (in
> terms of employing all the standard tricks). Does anyone have any idea if
> more could be done
convenient for you to try.
Andy
On Aug 28, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Warren Lynn wrote:
>
>
> With Tim's pointer, I worked around the completion exception on namespace by
> redefining the resolve-class. However, there is still another problem:
>
> If my cursor stops at the end of
>
>> (assoc {} :a 1 :b)
>> ;=> {:a 1, :b nil}
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Yes, please. That's just wrong.
>
> - Chas
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1052
Vote for it and/or comment on it, if you are interested.
Andy
--
You received this mess
> (define (A) 1)
#
> A
#
> (A)
1
> (define ((A)) 1)
#
> A
#
> (A)
#
> ((A))
1
Just wondering ...
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Baishampayan Ghose wrote:
> Something like this?
>
> (defn A []
> 1)
>
> (defn A []
> (fn [] 1))
That would work but I wonder about how "(define ((A)) 1)" is evaluated
in Scheme and why similar and easier approach is not possible in
Clojure?
--
You received
I use Rocket Scheme. The question was inspired by "Structure and
Interpretation" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Op3QLzMgSY at almost
end of the video @ 1:11:11
I actually think that "((A))" is more just a symbol name since
apparently you define "A" not a "((A))"/ It is more like a
recursive/ne
Let's focus on that for a sec:
(define ((A)) 1) is the same as (define (A) (lambda () 1));;
defines procedure "(A)"
I wonder if you meant >>defines procedure "((A))"<< instead.
Assuming that, if "((A))" is just a name of the procedure, then
"A" and "(A)". Should not evaluate at all. Appa
icate keys, although sorted-map does not for some
reason (probably an oversight when the duplicate key checks were added?). The
following works, but is a bit clunky:
(assoc {} a 5 b 7)
Thanks,
Andy
On Sep 3, 2012, at 7:49 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Mark Engelber
& map literals were to quietly allow
duplicates, with a new compiler option like the following that would give the
error, for those that like it?
(set! *error-on-duplicates* true)
Perhaps it is starting to look like feature creep, but I thought I'd throw out
the idea to see what happens.
On Sep 4, 2012, at 4:53 PM, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
> On 04/09/12 21:02, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>>
>> Stuart Halloway mentioned the idea of having two kinds of set/map
>> constructor functions, one kind which quietly eliminates duplicates, another
>> which throws
I've copied and pasted Mark's arguments to the Wiki page here:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Allow+duplicate+map+keys+and+set+elements
Andy
On Sep 5, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Stuart Halloway wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for extracting a summary of the conversation so far
program in assembler? For that matter, who
wants to write large programs in C?
Andy
On Aug 28, 2012, at 7:02 AM, Ben Mabey wrote:
> Thanks Andy for the insightful report! I knew you and others have worked
> hard on the benchmarks so this kind of analysis is very helpful.
>
> Thanks fo
occurrence of the same key. All
constructor functions explicitly say this in their doc strings.
Andy
On Sep 7, 2012, at 2:06 PM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>>> I&#x
I think I may have figured it out. New patch attached to ticket CLJ-1065 that
should eliminate run-time checks for duplicate map keys, for those maps whose
keys are all compile-time constants.
Andy
On Sep 8, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> Rich:
>
> I'm not sure wh
.4 to
ClojureDocs is not high on their list of priorities. They do say you can fork
their code and send them a pull request if you like, but it would probably be
best to first find out whether they are actually in the process of rewriting
the server code.
Andy
On Sep 11, 2012, at 4:01 AM, Wo
ssary check for
unique keys?
And by the word "restore" do you mean to imply that it was this way at one time
before?
Thanks,
Andy
On Sep 8, 2012, at 5:29 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I'm still interested in patch for recommendation #3:
>
> Restore the fa
modify the code
running on that new site.
CCing Zachary Kim, in hopes he will reply and let us know what he would
recommend.
Andy
On Sep 12, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Eric MacAdie wrote:
> I am also interested in helping out with ClojureDocs.
>
> - Eric MacAdie
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2
es of side
effects, and the return value is unimportant, try 'doseq' instead.
Andy
On Sep 13, 2012, at 6:54 PM, Giuliani Sanches wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Maybe the subject does not give a got clue about my question, so here's a
> snippet of code:
>
> http://pasteb
motivate you, go for it. Bonus points if
you have a team of people working on it that can keep it going even as
people move on to other projects in their lives.
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group,
On Sep 19, 2012, at 12:11 AM, kovas boguta wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Andy Fingerhut
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Paul deGrandis
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 1.) Clojure.org should have a better host of documentation, especially f
son that Clojure's STM is able to be implemented
as it is, is because *only* the refs, agents, and atoms can change, but all of
the things they "point to" are immutable.
Feel free to ask a followup question if that didn't make sense :-)
Andy
On Sep 20, 2012, at 1:40 PM, Pio
It depends.
Are you trying to optimize for speed? Teaching a particular style of
programming? Code size? Range of input values handled correctly? Time to
write it?
Something else?
Andy
On Oct 1, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:
> (ns power.examples)
>
> (defn non-acc-pow
Have you run a profiler on your tests to see where the time is spent with
Clojure 1.3 vs Clojure 1.4?
Andy
On Oct 2, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Karsten Schmidt wrote:
> Today, I decided to finally switch one of my projects from Clojure
> 1.3.0 to 1.4.0 (and test driving the 1.5.0 snapshot) but quic
I don't know the reason for the current implementation rather than your
suggested one, but at least on the comment about 0 or 1 arguments has a ticket
for it:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-863
Andy
On Oct 3, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Marc Dzaebel wrote:
> clojure.core/interleave
committed.
Andy
On Sep 12, 2012, at 3:22 AM, Rich Hickey wrote:
>
> On Sep 8, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
>> Rich:
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by the not-fastest-path possible that exists in
>> today's Clojure code, so if you get a ch
ld you be able to describe them briefly?
Curious to know what is planned there.
Thanks,
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
isn't terribly arcane.
Andy
On Oct 6, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Jay Fields wrote:
> The CA process isn't what stops me from contributing, the post a patch
> to Jira is what seems broken to me. I don't even remember how to
> create a patch. Clojure is on github - we live in a for
quick-and-reliable-but-$200.
Those are significantly higher barriers than for developers based in the USA
and Canada, where it is a 44 cent stamp and a few days to get there quite
reliably.
Andy
On Oct 6, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Softaddicts wrote:
> This insistence on the so-called "CA pain
Which OS are you using?
Which JVM? (i.e. output of "java -version")
Andy
On Oct 8, 2012, at 5:25 PM, Brian Craft wrote:
> I'm noticing that very regularly "lein run" will hang. Where it hangs is
> variable. At the moment it's right here:
>
&
the bottom of this page:
http://clojure.org/cheatsheet
The version on clojure.org will likely be updated soon.
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that po
ivation to modify the program for that purpose, unless it is very similar to
one of those.
Andy
On Oct 8, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Grant Rettke wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Andy Fingerhut
> wrote:
>> The only changes since the previous version are to add a mention of
&g
his behavior, though:
https://github.com/ztellman/gloss/pull/1
Andy
On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:00 AM, Brian Craft wrote:
> This is reproducible on ubuntu with a different jre:
>
> java version "1.6.0_24"
> OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea6 1.11.4) (6b24-1.11.4-1ubuntu0.12.04.1)
Clojure itself creates symbols with -> in them (I think defrecord creates
functions named by such symbols).
Andy
On Oct 9, 2012, at 6:12 AM, Mauricio Aldazosa wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> According to the reader documentation (http://clojure.org/reader), it seems
> that &#x
ojure/clojure.git
Or any other method you like to get it from here:
http://github.com/clojure/clojure
You can also see it from the REPL with:
(source clojure.core/spread)
Andy
On Oct 9, 2012, at 10:03 AM, Larry Travis wrote:
> As participants in this googlegroup have often observed, an excel
ect anyone to make these changes, but because you sound
like you might know the answer, i.e. maybe you have been in communication with
those people.
Thanks,
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this
d in an older
version of Clojure from about 2 years ago, I think.
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patien
My recent updates prompted me to go through my to do list of enhancement ideas
for the Clojure cheat sheet, and I did some of them.
It is now up in the usual places:
http://clojure.org/cheatsheet
Several other versions, including ones with tooltips containing doc strings:
http://jafingerhut.gi
tsheet myself. Alex Miller has been doing it for me,
since he has the necessary permissions to do it. I believe he looked into
publishing the tooltip version there but had some kinds of difficulties
figuring out how.
Perhaps someone else with permissions to edit clojure.org could help look into
ues you do not yet know until run time.
This trick won't help you in that case.
For the case of arithmetic on compile-time constants, I believe that many C,
Java, etc. compilers already perform the arithmetic at compile time.
Andy
--
You received this message because you are subscrib
2, I haven't
attempted to reorder the content to fit more nicely into 3.
Do you have any use cases for the PDF that the HTML won't do?
Andy
On Oct 16, 2012, at 7:15 AM, Nick Klauer wrote:
> I noticed that the PDF downloads seems a bit off. At least in my case, the
> standa
re changed --
first and rest work on all kinds of data structures besides lists, and return
implementations of a sequence abstraction, not necessarily pointers to cons
cells.
Andy
On Oct 16, 2012, at 3:40 PM, Curtis wrote:
> Hello - I was familar with lisp years ago and am very new to cloju
(car my-list) ...). No setf. Instead you make new data
structures that are like existing ones, but with changes to them (like a new
first/last element, or a new key/value pair in a map).
Andy
On Oct 17, 2012, at 11:16 AM, Curtis wrote:
> Cons seems to be strange
>
> How do i use
about whether this enhancement should be included in the
yet-to-be-released Clojure 1.5:
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1025
Andy
On Oct 18, 2012, at 4:12 AM, Henrik Mohr wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I'm wondering why ClojureScript seems to handle international characters
As mentioned in a recent thread "class name clashes on importing classes of
same name from different Java package", you can use the classes with fully
qualified names without importing them at all.
I am not aware of any way to alias them.
Andy
On Oct 21, 2012, at 6:57 PM, JvJ wro
s SourceForge, it is also available as a MacPorts package called
lp_solve, or an Ubuntu 12.04 package "lp-solve" (probably Debian and other
Ubuntu versions, too, but I only checked that one).
Andy
On Oct 24, 2012, at 2:17 PM, nathanmarz wrote:
> Cool, thanks for the quick response. We&#x
ays returns false in
your code example, because (io/file "string") returns a Java File object even
if there is no such file, and Clojure if evaluates that as true, not false.
Andy
On Oct 25, 2012, at 3:21 PM, larry google groups wrote:
> So, again, I'm trying to use Clojure t
with several examples of those kinds
of problems.
Andy
On Oct 26, 2012, at 9:06 AM, Brian Craft wrote:
> I've read about four tutorials on monads so far, but it still escapes me.
>
> In fact, I'm still not sure what problem it solves. I'm familiar with the
> problem of hav
clojure-contrib/blob/061f3d5b45657a89faa335ffa2bb80819f2e6918/src/main/clojure/clojure/contrib/io.clj#L302
Andy
On Oct 26, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Devin Walters wrote:
> I usually wind up with the line-seq from old contrib. Could you be more clear
> about what isn't satisfying about that? For me it usually boils down to:
video on blip.tv, it would be cool if they did that.
Andy
On Oct 17, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Jeff Heon wrote:
> If I may suggest the following presentation:
>
> http://blip.tv/clojure/clojure-for-lisp-programmers-part-1-1319721
> http://blip.tv/clojure/clojure-for-lisp-programme
places in the world than before, and might meet the legal
criteria that the Clojure/core team wants to preserve (whatever that might be).
I'm not saying that is what the process will become, but it is one among many
possibilities.
Andy
On Oct 30, 2012, at 2:51 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
On Oct 30, 2012, at 3:58 PM, Michael Klishin wrote:
> 2012/10/31 Andy Fingerhut
> I don't think the idea of the discussion is to go by majority vote
>
> It's not about making decisions by majority vote, Andy. It is about
> making sure many members of the community
e 1.3 and later.
Andy
On Oct 30, 2012, at 5:42 PM, Satoru Logic wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I am reading Clojure in Action.
>
> In the "scope" section of Chapter3, there are examples like this:
>
> defn twice [x]
> (println "original function")
> (
ar case of (seq (range 5)) I believe it will evaluate the entire
sequence because of a performance optimization where range returns a "chunked"
lazy sequence that produces values in chunks of 32 elements at a time).
Andy
On Nov 2, 2012, at 7:37 AM, Satoru Logic wrote:
>
>
> O
re of the
code, not just local method-by-method or function-by-function changes.
This takes much more time, and for programs with any complexity at all you'd
have to do lots of re-testing to ensure your Clojure implementation was
correct, but the end result should be more maintainable.
Andy
I created CLJ-1103 and attached a patch that makes this change, as well as
related changes to conj! assoc assoc! and dissoc! (dissoc, disj and disj!
already handled these cases).
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1103
Andy
On Nov 4, 2012, at 5:52 AM, Jonathan Fischer Friberg wrote:
>
ess, mind you. I haven't tried out smaller experiments to see whether
>that is true in general, or whether it is something about this particular
>function that causes that.
Andy
On Nov 8, 2012, at 6:50 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
> I can now add that the 30 taken by the cache lookup
code in Java and
call it from Clojure. Java is to Clojure as in-line assembler is to C, except
that it isn't in-line :-)
Andy
On Nov 9, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Yakovlev Roman wrote:
> what a mess if it is a function it's huuge did you try split it to useful
> chunks ? it's just
h, and
it is stopping when waiting for the evaluation of either @out or @err in the
final line of the function.
If I do the same commands above on Mac OS X, with "open" instead of "xdg-open",
it all works as I expect.
Any clues?
Thanks,
Andy
--
You received this message beca
CLJ-896 is committed, which is the reason I was testing this and
finding the odd behavior.
http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-896
Thanks,
Andy
On Nov 10, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Aaron Cohen wrote:
> I'm pretty sure xdg-open ends up being a thin wrapper that delegates
> to your des
t;, even though internally they mutate data. By "purely
functional at the API level", I mean that the only mutable data accessed by the
function is allocated by it, and becomes garbage before the function returns.
re-pattern, re-matches, re-seq, clojure.string/replace,
clojure.string/repla
Check git commit logs from a month or so ago. Rich Hickey committed it.
Andy
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 15, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Mark Engelberg wrote:
> Where did you find the proposal? I can't find any info about let->
>
> --
> You received this message because you a
ere are, it would be good to
mention that the line should be removed after running clojuredocs.
Thanks,
Andy
On Nov 16, 2012, at 7:58 AM, Lee Hinman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
> I'm pleased to announce three different projects, all relate
rograms to take much advantage
of Haskell's library, unless you basically created an "Object" type in Haskell
that could hold objects of any type. Perhaps clojure-py might be a better fit?
https://github.com/halgari/clojure-py
Anyway, some things you might be interested in looking at.
infrastructure. They're calling scheme is
nothing like Java's, right? You have to pass additional things, or
trampoline, or whatever. Clojure does none of that. Clojure has
pedal to the metal calling conventions that match Java's, so I don't
have tail recursion, because you
901 - 1000 of 1127 matches
Mail list logo
