If if-let/when-let had multiple bindings, how would you propose to define the condition of whether to do the "then" branch?
As the logical AND of all of the multiple forms? The OR? Only use the first expression? Only the last? I don't see that any of those is any more clear or "least surprising" than any of the others. Permitting only one makes that part of the behavior clear, at least. Andy On May 15, 2012, at 12:09 PM, Hubert Iwaniuk wrote: > I tried using if-let with multiple binding in past as well. > Following least surprise principle, I would like to see support for multiple > bindings. > > Cheers, > Hubert. >> Vinzent May 15, 2012 5:47 PM >> Or maybe if-let and when-let should support multiple bindings, like the doc >> states. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
<<inline: compose-unknown-contact.jpg>>
