Hi all,
How do people autoload code in their repl at startup? I'd like to
specify code that would be loaded into each repl that I start with
slime. E.g. (use 'clojure.contrib.repl-utils) and (set!
*warn-on-reflection* true). Not being able to do this easily means
that I don't use e.g. the repl-uti
Hi,
Since in Clojure 1.2 all data structures are serializable and Clojure
is homoiconicity language. Why don't make functions serializable? I'm
trying to pass function with RMI and execute in on the second REPL.
Right now, the only way to get it working is to pass string and
evaluate it on REPL. H
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 10:43:00 Lauri Pesonen wrote:
> How do people autoload code in their repl at startup?
> [...]
>
> I know I can use user.clj on my classpath to do this, but then I need
> to copy that file to each clojure project that I have.
I think ~/.clojure/user.clj is evaluated on each
On 11.05.2010, at 11:42, Michael Jaaka wrote:
> Since in Clojure 1.2 all data structures are serializable and Clojure
> is homoiconicity language. Why don't make functions serializable? I'm
> trying to pass function with RMI and execute in on the second REPL.
I didn't try this myself yet, but my
On 11 May 2010 10:55, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> I think ~/.clojure/user.clj is evaluated on each clojure startup, so you
> could add that code there.
At least in my setup ~/.clojure/user.clj does not get loaded unless
~/.clojure is in the JVM classpath.
> Tassilo
--
! Lauri
--
You received thi
Well, this is obvious, but I would like to eliminate AOT and
distribution between units. This would give advantage over non-
functional languages like C++/Java since functions in Clojure should
be treated just like any other value. Currently they are handicapped.
Right now I can imagine that imple
Thank you very much, this time it worked perfectly.
I knew it was very easy, but I could not figure it out not having all
that java/shell experience.
At one point I also tried something like this, with the colon, but it
did not work, so probably I mistook the order or something.
Thank you.
Matteo
Hi Jason,
I created a project called ClojureW (http://bitbucket.org/kasim/
clojurew/src/ )that I believe exactly provides what you are looking
for. It is just a simple launch script. You can run it via command
line without any set up. If you have Clojure installed already, you
can just set CLOJURE
you should learn how the java class paths works
but take a look At http://github.com/technomancy/leiningen
i wish i would how found that earlier.
2010/5/10 Mat
> Hi all,
> I am totally new to clojure and this is a very simple question, but I
> spent the last two hours trying to figure this out
Hi Team,
I am really interested in functional programming. But I am asking
myself, what if the project get bigger, like the software Runa realise
with Clojure. In OOP we got diagrams like UML to visualise this. But
what can we do in FP ? Are there any diagrams that can be used to
explain things ?
On May 11, 11:18 am, Donell Jones
wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I am really interested in functional programming. But I am asking
> myself, what if the project get bigger, like the software Runa realise
> with Clojure. In OOP we got diagrams like UML to visualise this. But
> what can we do in FP ? Are there
On 11.05.2010, at 13:07, Michael Jaaka wrote:
> Right now I can imagine that implementation would look like this. Each
> function has it own raw input form (string which is parsed by clj
> reader). On serialization, that raw form would be serialized and
> received on the other unit. With first cal
Thanks for your reply. I think flowchart make sense but I can´t
imagine how a big project can be visualised with that (???).
I think no manager in the world would make a big project without a
good documentation ... nah I know there are some :)
On 11 Mai, 15:01, Jarkko Oranen wrote:
> On May 11,
Put the homoiconic nature of Clojure to work. Make a variation of
clojure.inspect and use it to create charts of program flow, or tweak
your own version of autodoc. Take full advantage of metadata.
There's a ton of long hanging fruit here if you just go looking for
it.
My $.02
Sean
On May 11,
So there is no standard for it, right ? People do what they know
best ?
On 11 Mai, 16:04, Sean Devlin wrote:
> Put the homoiconic nature of Clojure to work. Make a variation of
> clojure.inspect and use it to create charts of program flow, or tweak
> your own version of autodoc. Take full advan
Autodoc is the only thing that's remotely standard. Clojure is just a
toddler, after all :)
Sean
On May 11, 10:08 am, Donell Jones
wrote:
> So there is no standard for it, right ? People do what they know
> best ?
>
> On 11 Mai, 16:04, Sean Devlin wrote:
>
>
>
> > Put the homoiconic nature of
Oups, I stopped using windows for so long that I forgot about the
semi-colon thing :)))
That frees a lot of memory for other stuff...
Luc
On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 08:38 +0200, Michael Wood wrote:
> On 11 May 2010 03:30, Luc Préfontaine wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > The trick is to get contrib on the
http://github.com/technomancy/serializable-fn/
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
> On 11.05.2010, at 13:07, Michael Jaaka wrote:
>
>> Right now I can imagine that implementation would look like this. Each
>> function has it own raw input form (string which is parsed by clj
>>
+1 (note them stacking up at the bottom?)
On May 9, 10:04 pm, ka wrote:
> +1
>
> On May 7, 2:13 am, Mibu wrote:
>
> > Am I the only one driven mad by the new auto-appended signature to
> > every message in this group ("You received this message because you
> > are subscribed...")? It started on
Assembla Ticket #311 [1] calls for the promotion of clojure.contrib.io
into clojure (as clojure.java.io). I have attached a patch, and am
requesting comments and code review from the community.
Reasons you want to take time from your day to read this code:
(1) It's important. This isn't just
> Assembla Ticket #311 [1] calls for the promotion of clojure.contrib.io into
> clojure (as clojure.java.io). I have attached a patch, and am requesting
> comments and code review from the community.
Should delete-file-recursively recurse down symlinks (on platforms
that support them)? An admitted
[format recovered from top postgin.]
> > > On May 7, 2:13 am, Mibu wrote:
> > > Am I the only one driven mad by the new auto-appended signature to
> > > every message in this group ("You received this message because you
> > > are subscribed...")? It started on April 16th. Is there a way a
> > >
(def a (ref ()))
(def b (ref ()))
(dosync
(alter a conj b))
(dosync
(alter b conj a))
This last expression fails with an "Evalutation aborted" message on
Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT (it works on Clojure 1.1.0). Maybe I am
not using refs correctly, but I did not expect this to fail. Can
anyo
Hi Michael,
Some time ago I came along Harbor: a server which can serialize Java
objects (and classes) over the wire
See http://coolharbor.100free.com/index.htm
Not open source but free. Hope you get some inspiration.
verd
On 11 mayo, 11:42, Michael Jaaka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since in Clojure 1.2
Hi,
On May 9, 7:15 pm, Benjamin Teuber wrote:
> Hi nipra,
>
> and which swank-clojure do you use on the emacs side? I guess not the
> one from ELPA, right?
I've not made any changes on the emacs side. I'm using swank-clojure
from ELPA.
Regards,
nipra
--
You received this message because you a
And Data Flow Diagrams?
I learnt about them while studying structured analysis
and design at University, but I always thought they did
not match very well with imperative programming...
Rubén
Donell Jones escribió:
Thanks for your reply. I think flowchart make sense but I can´t
imag
it is annoying +1
marc
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Mike Meyer
wrote:
> [format recovered from top postgin.]
>
>> > > On May 7, 2:13 am, Mibu wrote:
>> > > Am I the only one driven mad by the new auto-appended signature to
>> > > every message in this group ("You received this message beca
> (def a (ref ()))
>
> (def b (ref ()))
>
> (dosync
> (alter a conj b))
>
> (dosync
> (alter b conj a))
>
> This last expression fails with an "Evalutation aborted" message on
> Clojure 1.2.0-master-SNAPSHOT (it works on Clojure 1.1.0). Maybe I am
> not using refs correctly, but I did not expect
I am trying to call a java method using apply, like :
(apply .println [System/out "hello" "world"])
But I get an error: "Unable to resolve symbol: .println in this context"
Am I missing something?
Thanks,
Alex
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cloj
Using an option for symlinks raises the possibility of using options
to let delete-file handle everything, e.g.
(delete-file "foo" :recursive true)
instead of
(delete-file-recursively "foo")
Stu
Assembla Ticket #311 [1] calls for the promotion of
clojure.contrib.io into
clojure (as clojur
On May 11, 2010, at 19:05 , Marc Spitzer wrote:
> it is annoying +1
>
> marc
>
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Mike Meyer
> wrote:
>> [format recovered from top postgin.]
>>
> On May 7, 2:13 am, Mibu wrote:
> Am I the only one driven mad by the new auto-appended signature to
On May 11, 2010, at 19:39 , Alexandre Patry wrote:
> I am trying to call a java method using apply, like :
>
> (apply .println [System/out "hello" "world"])
>
> But I get an error: "Unable to resolve symbol: .println in this context"
>
> Am I missing something?
Apply only works on clojure met
Stuart,
I think it's a great idea to ask the community for input.
I'm new to working with Assembla (and still a little new to working
with git and github.) So, if I pull down the master branch of Clojure
from http://github.com/richhickey/clojure and apply the patch file I
find on Assembla, I'll h
Yes, that is right. "git apply" or "git am" should work.
Stu
Stuart,
I think it's a great idea to ask the community for input.
I'm new to working with Assembla (and still a little new to working
with git and github.) So, if I pull down the master branch of Clojure
from http://github.com/richh
Le 2010-05-11 13:45, Heinz N. Gies a écrit :
On May 11, 2010, at 19:39 , Alexandre Patry wrote:
I am trying to call a java method using apply, like :
(apply .println [System/out "hello" "world"])
But I get an error: "Unable to resolve symbol: .println in this context"
Am I missing someth
For now, the idiomatic way to do this is to use the shorthand
anonymous form:
(apply #(.println %) ... )
Of course the example of printing to System.out is fairly well covered
with Clojure API fns anyway...
Stu
I am trying to call a java method using apply, like :
(apply .printl
Peter-
Thanks for the tip. I was aware of the stack overflow issue you
described, but your comment motivated me to switch to using "mvn
clojure:repl" instead of "mvn clojure:swank" to test the code, and
this does appear to work (modulo the REPL printing issue).
Thank you.
-David McNeil
--
You r
On May 11, 2010, at 12:39 PM, Alexandre Patry wrote:
> I am trying to call a java method using apply, like :
>
> (apply .println [System/out "hello" "world"])
>
> But I get an error: "Unable to resolve symbol: .println in this context"
>
> Am I missing something?
Unfortunately, Java methods ar
Personally, I think this idea is a bad one, that will come back to bite
people hard- but I doubt anyone is going to listen to me.
If you serialize the code (either in lisp s-expression form, or java byte
code), you can easily end up serializing most of the whole program. See,
serialization isn't
Hi,
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 07:43:13PM +0200, Heinz N. Gies wrote:
> >>> +1 (note them stacking up at the bottom?)
> >>
> >> Not if people have the courtesy to edit the text they are following up.
>
> And Mike is right, if people post usefully and don't do TOFU style
> replies there won't be a
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Konrad Hinsen
wrote:
>> Right now I can imagine that implementation would look like this. Each
>> function has it own raw input form (string which is parsed by clj
>> reader). On serialization, that raw form would be serialized and
>> received on the other unit. Wi
Any examples ?
On 11 Mai, 16:03, Rubén Béjar wrote:
> And Data Flow Diagrams?
> I learnt about them while studying structured analysis
> and design at University, but I always thought they did
> not match very well with imperative programming...
> Rubén
> Donell Jones escribió:Thanks for your
> Using an option for symlinks raises the possibility of using options to let
> delete-file handle everything, e.g.
>
> (delete-file "foo" :recursive true)
>
> instead of
>
> (delete-file-recursively "foo")
Yes. A potential argument for not conflating them might be that
"delete-file" is a pretty s
Try LabVIEW
On May 11, 2:33 pm, Donell Jones
wrote:
> Any examples ?
>
> On 11 Mai, 16:03, Rubén Béjar wrote:
>
>
>
> > And Data Flow Diagrams?
> > I learnt about them while studying structured analysis
> > and design at University, but I always thought they did
> > not match very well with impe
Kevin and Phil nice work.
Now if only object returned by fn had implemented Serializable and
custom serialization functions which were doing:
private void writeObject(ObjectOutputStream out) throws IOException
{
(with-out-str
(print (pr-str this)))
}
private void read
On 11 May 2010 18:37, Peter Schuller wrote:
>> Assembla Ticket #311 [1] calls for the promotion of clojure.contrib.io into
>> clojure (as clojure.java.io). I have attached a patch, and am requesting
>> comments and code review from the community.
>
> Should delete-file-recursively recurse down sym
Hi Stuart,
Nice piece of job !
I will nonetheless try to be constructive and give you some remarks I
made to myself while reading the patch:
* Shouldn't IOFactory protocol have a docstring to describe the
possible options ? (So that it is possible to extend the protocol even
further, e.g. when
On May 11, 7:41 am, Mat wrote:
> Thank you very much, this time it worked perfectly.
> I knew it was very easy, but I could not figure it out not having all
> that java/shell experience.
I'm sorry to bother you again with this silly question, but on the
contrary of what I said I'm still not able
> Following symlinks in delete-file-recursively sounds like a recipe for
> disaster to me.
Sorry, I should have been more explicit. The (delete-file-recursively
...) in the patch *does* follow symlinks (implicitly, because
isDirectory() returns true for symlinks pointing to diretories).
The simpl
so i dont se clojure.contrib.string in the contrib
the documentation is maybe lagin?
2010/5/11 Mat
>
> On May 11, 7:41 am, Mat wrote:
> > Thank you very much, this time it worked perfectly.
> > I knew it was very easy, but I could not figure it out not having all
> > that java/shell experience.
Matteo,
which version of clojure-contrib are you using ? The latest has the
String class but an earlier version may not have it.
To see the content:
jar -tf clojure-contrib.jar
You should see a string.clj in the list of components in the library and
some string$xxx.class files. If not you are u
Booch, Rumbaugh and Jacobson took standard practices and tweaked them
to the fashion of the mid '90's, tough they acknowledge only one
another and their help in the UML User Guide. We can tweaking the UML
away from its OOD bias as well as going to traditional techniques as
simple as flowcharts, E-R
Okay...eleven days later and I've finally got something that works!
You can find a fully working Clojure version of GraphEditor.java at
http://gist.github.com/398198
Clojure beginners, there is a lot you can learn from comparing the
Java and Clojure versions of this program (though Clojure progra
Luc,
I'm using the latest one, v1.1.0. I downloaded it here:
http://code.google.com/p/clojure-contrib/downloads/list
I'm using the same version for clojure.jar.
The strange thing is that when I inspect the content of the jar, there
is no clojure/contrib/string, but only clojure/contrib/str_utils
Looking at the source in the master branch on Github, string.clj is
present, but if I look into the 1.1.x branch, it's not.
I will try to checkout the source from Github and compile it directly.
Matteo
On May 12, 7:51 am, Mat wrote:
> Luc,
>
> I'm using the latest one, v1.1.0. I downloaded it
>
55 matches
Mail list logo
