Booch, Rumbaugh and Jacobson took standard practices and tweaked them to the fashion of the mid '90's, tough they acknowledge only one another and their help in the UML User Guide. We can tweaking the UML away from its OOD bias as well as going to traditional techniques as simple as flowcharts, E-R diagrams, and great ad-hoc drawings like those in Knuth's TAOCP. Start with those and just take it from there. Add text, audio, video... watercolors, anything to get your point across. And keep it simple and to the point; after all these are models.
On May 11, 1:18 am, Donell Jones <alliwantisca...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Hi Team, > I am really interested in functional programming. But I am asking > myself, what if the project get bigger, like the software Runa realise > with Clojure. In OOP we got diagrams like UML to visualise this. But > what can we do in FP ? Are there any diagrams that can be used to > explain things ? > > I think this is very important when it comes to documentation. > > Thanks for your help! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
