http://github.com/technomancy/serializable-fn/
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:18 AM, Konrad Hinsen <konrad.hin...@fastmail.net> wrote: > On 11.05.2010, at 13:07, Michael Jaaka wrote: > >> Right now I can imagine that implementation would look like this. Each >> function has it own raw input form (string which is parsed by clj >> reader). On serialization, that raw form would be serialized and >> received on the other unit. With first call, such deserialized >> function would check if it is compiled, if not then it compiles its >> raw form then executes it. > > That's not sufficient because you have to serialize closures, not plain > functions. You need more than just the source code. > > Konrad. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good— Need we ask anyone to tell us these things? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
