Re: test-is possible bug in are

2008-12-19 Thread Mark Volkmann
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Stuart Sierra wrote: > > On Dec 18, 6:05 pm, "Mark Volkmann" wrote: >> If I understand correctly, >> >> (are (< 1 2, 5 7)) >> >> is equivalent to >> >> (is (< 1 2)) >> (is (< 5 7)) > > Not exactly. The first argument to "are" is a template expression, > which is

Re: test-is possible bug in are

2008-12-18 Thread Stuart Sierra
On Dec 18, 6:05 pm, "Mark Volkmann" wrote: > If I understand correctly, > > (are (< 1 2, 5 7)) > > is equivalent to > > (is (< 1 2)) > (is (< 5 7)) Not exactly. The first argument to "are" is a template expression, which is sort of like #(). The arguments to the template are symbols named "_1"

test-is possible bug in are

2008-12-18 Thread Mark Volkmann
If I understand correctly, (are (< 1 2, 5 7)) is equivalent to (is (< 1 2)) (is (< 5 7)) The following may be incorrect usage of are: (are < 1 2, 5 7) However, instead of complaining about the arguments, it hangs forever. -- R. Mark Volkmann Object Computing, Inc. --~--~-~--~~