Awesome! Thanks.
And I can't think of a better way. This is ultimately the same problem
found in this sort of code:
(let [something-we-need-to-close (open whatever)]
(try (something-lazy something-we-need-to-close)
(finally (close something-we-need-to-close
This was discussed recen
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Chouser wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Jeffrey Straszheim
> wrote:
>> Does the stuff in error kit work across thread boundaries. I'm thinking,
>> for instance, if you run a computation using pmap, the individual
>> computations are run inside of Java
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Jeffrey Straszheim
wrote:
> Does the stuff in error kit work across thread boundaries. I'm thinking,
> for instance, if you run a computation using pmap, the individual
> computations are run inside of Java futures, which will propagate exceptions
> back to the c
Does the stuff in error kit work across thread boundaries. I'm thinking,
for instance, if you run a computation using pmap, the individual
computations are run inside of Java futures, which will propagate exceptions
back to the caller when the caller gets the value. So, pmap should work
fairly tr
