Ah, okay, I see the idea. I'm not sure why it doesn't work.
For now, I think, using an atom and reset! seems to do the job!
Phil
atkaaz writes:
> The following idea came to me in the shower, sort of out of the blue, and I
> don't know why I didn't think of it before(I'm disappointed with mys
The following idea came to me in the shower, sort of out of the blue, and I
don't know why I didn't think of it before(I'm disappointed with myself)
so, why not use the same thing as clojure does? even though it does it in
java, you can do it in clojure, the only thing is that you have to do it
onc
Jim writes:
> On 17/05/13 11:00, Phillip Lord wrote:
>> It's a nice language, I think. It inherits however the some of the
>> nastiness of Java, in particular it doesn't integrate at all into the
>> OS; the makes it not a good fit for little scripting, one-off jobs which
>> form the basis of a lo
On 17/05/13 11:00, Phillip Lord wrote:
It's a nice language, I think. It inherits however the some of the
nastiness of Java, in particular it doesn't integrate at all into the
OS; the makes it not a good fit for little scripting, one-off jobs which
form the basis of a lot of scientific computing.
"Jim - FooBar();" writes:
> You can count on that! In addition, whenever I find some free time I'd like to
> have a look at the lib and familiarise myself with it...and who knows, I may
> even have some (humble yet constructive) comments/feedback. Also, I think
> you'll find Clojure is a joy to wo
On 16/05/13 16:48, Phillip Lord wrote:
I have one main user at the moment, although she is my PhD student; I
claim no coercion.
I am a Ph.D student myself and that's exactly where I will most likely
need ontologies...
Something tells me we're going to be in contact soon :)
Give me a shout if
Jim writes:
> On 16/05/13 15:07, Phillip Lord wrote:
>> Yep, that's the problem. The library in question
>> (https://github.com/phillord/tawny-owl) is meant to be usable by people
>> who don't want to know that they are writing clojure.
> Funny that you're writing an ontology lib - my research is
On 16/05/13 15:07, Phillip Lord wrote:
Yep, that's the problem. The library in question
(https://github.com/phillord/tawny-owl) is meant to be usable by people
who don't want to know that they are writing clojure.
Funny that you're writing an ontology lib - my research is increasingly
driving me
Jim writes:
> On 16/05/13 12:45, Phillip Lord wrote:
>> I have a process that
>> produces logging output, and I want the user to be able to define
>> where that output goes.
>
> or you can define a multi-method or a tiny protocol with 2-3
> implementations (for GUI, raw-text or file-output) and
Jim writes:
> On 16/05/13 13:56, AtKaaZ wrote:
>> In a way I'm in his shoes, but I always assumed that the user would use
>> binding even if that meant encompassing the whole program in it.
>
> personally, I find it rather unpleasant to depend on a lib that forces me to
> use 'binding' in such a
Jim writes:
> On 16/05/13 12:52, AtKaaZ wrote:
>> why not ref and dosync?
>
> a bit heavyweight isn't it?
Yep, that's the problem. The library in question
(https://github.com/phillord/tawny-owl) is meant to be usable by people
who don't want to know that they are writing clojure.
>
> dynamic s
On 16/05/13 13:56, AtKaaZ wrote:
In a way I'm in his shoes, but I always assumed that the user would
use binding even if that meant encompassing the whole program in it.
personally, I find it rather unpleasant to depend on a lib that forces
me to use 'binding' in such a top-level fashion...Clo
you're right, I somehow didn't read what he was using it for, just looked
at the examples he gave and assumed generic var
In a way I'm in his shoes, but I always assumed that the user would use
binding even if that meant encompassing the whole program in it. Like if
you wanted to disable asserts
On 16/05/13 12:52, AtKaaZ wrote:
why not ref and dosync?
a bit heavyweight isn't it?
A bit off topic but I remember when Clojure came out, STM was the big
selling point! I've been programming Clojure for more than 3 years now
and I've yet to write code that uses STM but that wasn't intention
On 16/05/13 12:45, Phillip Lord wrote:
I have a process that
produces logging output, and I want the user to be able to define
where that output goes.
or you can define a multi-method or a tiny protocol with 2-3
implementations (for GUI, raw-text or file-output) and let your user
select what
why not ref and dosync?
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Phillip Lord
wrote:
> Jim writes:
>
> > On 16/05/13 11:33, Phillip Lord wrote:
> >> And if it is okay to use set!
> >> on*warn-on-reflection*, why is it not okay to allow me, as the library
> >> developer, to define similar properties fo
Jim writes:
> On 16/05/13 11:33, Phillip Lord wrote:
>> And if it is okay to use set!
>> on*warn-on-reflection*, why is it not okay to allow me, as the library
>> developer, to define similar properties for my library which work in a
>> similar way.
>
> well, nothing stops you from providing bind
On 16/05/13 11:33, Phillip Lord wrote:
And if it is okay to use set!
on*warn-on-reflection*, why is it not okay to allow me, as the library
developer, to define similar properties for my library which work in a
similar way.
well, nothing stops you from providing bindings at the main entry point
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Phillip Lord wrote:
> "Jim - FooBar();" writes:
> causes an error. What it doesn't explain is why
>
> (set! *warn-on-reflection* true)
>
> works just fine. Is the REPL running inside a binding? Is it possible to
> add other forms of this binding? Or not? And if
You can do (set! *warn-on-reflection* true) because *warn-on-reflection*
is already thread-locally bound...
Is the REPL running inside a binding?
essentially yes...
Is it possible to
add other forms of this binding? Or not?
as Atkaaz pointed out yesterday these vars are in Java code so I'm
"Jim - FooBar();" writes:
>>> (set!*my-test* true)
>>
>> (alter-var-root #'*my-test* (constantly true))
>
> here explains what you're asking:
> http://clojure.org/Vars
>
> scroll down to until you see
No, this only explains why
(def ^{:dynamic true} *my-test* false)
(set! *my-test* true)
c
I think the answer is in RT 's doInit
Var.pushThreadBindings(
RT.mapUniqueKeys(CURRENT_NS, CURRENT_NS.deref(),
WARN_ON_REFLECTION, WARN_ON_REFLECTION.deref()
,RT.UNCHECKED_MATH, RT.UNCHECKED_MATH.deref()));
it basically does a
(binding [*warn-on-r
On 15/05/13 17:28, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
On 15/05/13 17:23, Phillip Lord wrote:
I cannot do
(set!*my-test* true)
(alter-var-root #'*my-test* (constantly true))
Jim
here explains what you're asking:
http://clojure.org/Vars
scroll down to until you see
(*set!*var-symbol expr)
HT
On 15/05/13 17:23, Phillip Lord wrote:
I cannot do
(set!*my-test* true)
(alter-var-root #'*my-test* (constantly true))
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note tha
I'm still a bit confused on the use of set!
I would like to define a configuration variable that is easy to change,
but which is not critical to my infrastructure; it's will set some
default behaviours.
Now, I can do things like
(binding [*warn-on-reflection* true]
(do-some-function))
an
25 matches
Mail list logo
