On 16/05/13 11:33, Phillip Lord wrote:
And if it is okay to use set!
on*warn-on-reflection*, why is it not okay to allow me, as the library
developer, to define similar properties for my library which work in a
similar way.
well, nothing stops you from providing bindings at the main entry point
of your library, much in the same way that Clojure does...then consumers
can use set! as you expect. That said, I wouldn't go down that road
simply because it gives that 'global-state' smell...
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
