Jim <jimpil1...@gmail.com> writes: > On 16/05/13 12:52, AtKaaZ wrote: >> why not ref and dosync? > > a bit heavyweight isn't it?
Yep, that's the problem. The library in question (https://github.com/phillord/tawny-owl) is meant to be usable by people who don't want to know that they are writing clojure. > > dynamic scope is another story though...I very much intentionally stayed away > from it! > It's useful, but scary. It mixes with laziness badly, but then, so do exceptions. It's nice, though for use in test fixtures.... (defn ontology-reasoner-fixture [tests] (binding [r/*reasoner-progress-monitor* r/reasoner-progress-monitor-silent] (tests))) for instance. This prevents the code from either poping up a GUI or generating lots of spam output, which is not good in a test. Phil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
