On May 31, 2012, at 9:14 AM, michaelr524 wrote:
> Why the following triggers infinite realization of the infinite lazy
> seq
You've catted together an infinite seq of empty seqs, and forcing a lazy seq
doesn't stop until either an element or known emptiness is found, whereas you
provide neithe
2009/5/16 Sean Devlin :
>
> I'm sorry, it's an Americanism. By "Dog People", I meant someone that
> prefers a dog as a pet, not a cat. It was meant as a joke.
OK, I know understand the joke and the play on words :-$
>
> You're right, I should be more considerate of the international
> audience
Hi,
Am 16.05.2009 um 22:42 schrieb Sean Devlin:
I was making a joke about housecats.
Argh. Sorry. I always pronounce "cat" in german
rather than english. Some strange tick of mine.
So I didn't get the play of words.
Sincerely
Meikel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
I was making a joke about housecats.
Maybe I should file a bug report saying cat should default to being
lazy :)
Again, sorry for the confusion.
On May 16, 4:34 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 16.05.2009 um 21:58 schrieb Sean Devlin:
>
> > Lazy cat is redundant.
>
> concat != lazy-ca
Hi,
Am 16.05.2009 um 21:58 schrieb Sean Devlin:
Lazy cat is redundant.
concat != lazy-cat. lazy-cat is obviously not redundant.
Sincerely
Meikel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
I'm sorry, it's an Americanism. By "Dog People", I meant someone that
prefers a dog as a pet, not a cat. It was meant as a joke.
You're right, I should be more considerate of the international
audience, and careful to make my tone more clear. Thank you for
speaking up.
Sean
On May 16, 4:13 p
2009/5/16 Sean Devlin :
>
> Clearly you are all dog people.
Hello,
What means calling others "dog people" exactly ?
Not being a native english person, I'm unsure whether the above is an
insult, is ironic, or something else ?
Anyway, the above sentence, without any smiley of some sort to explai
Clearly you are all dog people. Lazy cat is redundant.
On May 16, 3:55 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 16.05.2009 um 21:48 schrieb George Jahad:
>
> > I can't come up with a reason to use lazy-cat over concat. Is it
> > just around for backwards compatibility, or am I missing someth
Hi,
Am 16.05.2009 um 21:48 schrieb George Jahad:
I can't come up with a reason to use lazy-cat over concat. Is it
just around for backwards compatibility, or am I missing something?
(defmacro lazy-cat
[& colls]
`(concat ~@(map #(list `lazy-seq %) colls)))
There is a difference! Consider
