2009/5/16 Sean Devlin <francoisdev...@gmail.com>: > > Clearly you are all dog people.
Hello, What means calling others "dog people" exactly ? Not being a native english person, I'm unsure whether the above is an insult, is ironic, or something else ? Anyway, the above sentence, without any smiley of some sort to explain the intended tone, really denotes from what has been seen so far in this ml, and I hope this kind of think will be kept at least for irc, if not for private correspondance only. My 0,02 € (but being from a "dog people", maybe this does not count as if it had been written by a not "dog people" ?), -- Laurent > Lazy cat is redundant. > > On May 16, 3:55 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer <m...@kotka.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Am 16.05.2009 um 21:48 schrieb George Jahad: >> >> > I can't come up with a reason to use lazy-cat over concat. Is it >> > just around for backwards compatibility, or am I missing something? >> >> > (defmacro lazy-cat >> > [& colls] >> > `(concat ~@(map #(list `lazy-seq %) colls))) >> >> There is a difference! Consider the following: >> >> (concat (make-foo-seq) (make-bar-seq)) >> vs. >> (lazy-cat (make-foo-seq) (make-bar-seq)) >> >> In the first case the function are called immediately. >> In the second case the function call is delayed until >> they are accessed the first time. >> >> Sincerely >> Meikel >> >> smime.p7s >> 5KViewDownload > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
