On May 31, 2012, at 9:14 AM, michaelr524 <michaelr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why the following triggers infinite realization of the infinite lazy > seq You've catted together an infinite seq of empty seqs, and forcing a lazy seq doesn't stop until either an element or known emptiness is found, whereas you provide neither. Consider: should the following terminate? (doall (filter #(< % 42) (range))) > and how I can work around it and make it stop when f1 returns an > empty seq, You need a sentinel so you can use take-while, or another code path in f2 that provides the aforementioned termination condition. -- Stephen Compall Greetings from sunny Appleton! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
