On 23.01.2009, at 22:47, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
> Are you pointing out that closures as well as macros may require
> same-world compilation?
Yes.
> When compiling that to bytecode, one could implement (effectively):
>
> (declare-private _my-factor-311)
> (defn foo [x] (* _my-fa
On Jan 23, 2009, at 4:13 PM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
How about something like
(let [my-factor (* 3 (. Math sqrt 2) (. Math log 42.))]
(defn foo [x] (* my-factor x)))
where the let outside of the definition makes sure the constant
factor is evaluated only once?
Are you pointing out that closu
On 23.01.2009, at 19:04, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
> is something that ultimately invokes "def". On the way to invoking
> def, one could also allow compiling code, but not running it,
> deferring initializers until some kind of "load" time. Macros
> present a problem with this strategy, of
On Jan 23, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Konrad Hinsen wrote:
Some questions this raises:
- Should libs be restricted to definitions (and lib support things
like "ns" and (some kind of) "load-resource") only?
- Should the appearance of an "ns" form automatically make that
restriction enforced for the re
2009/1/23 Konrad Hinsen
>
> On Jan 23, 2009, at 17:15, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
>
> > I recently changed my "user.clj" file to be purely full of
> > definitions. I think it fits well with the "require"/"use" model
> > that reloading ought to only affect what's available to call after
> > the loa
On Jan 23, 2009, at 17:15, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote:
> I recently changed my "user.clj" file to be purely full of
> definitions. I think it fits well with the "require"/"use" model
> that reloading ought to only affect what's available to call after
> the load, not actually "do" (in the Clo
On Jan 23, 2009, at 8:38 AM, Peter Wolf wrote:
Looking for opinions from Clojure internals Wizards...
I can think of only one Clojure internals Wizard, but I have some
thoughts.
I am thinking about "safe loading" for IDEs (see other thread). IDEs
need a way to load and resolve code, wit
