On 23.01.2009, at 22:47, Stephen C. Gilardi wrote: > Are you pointing out that closures as well as macros may require > same-world compilation?
Yes. > When compiling that to bytecode, one could implement (effectively): > > (declare-private _my-factor-311) > (defn foo [x] (* _my-factor-311 x)) > > (defn _static-initialize [] > (.bindRoot (var _my-factor-311) (* 3 (Math/sqrt 2) (Math/log > 42)))) > > and arrange to call a lib's _static-initialize function whenever a > compiled lib is loaded. Certainly, but I guess this would be extra work for the compiler, because it would handle a let differently depending on whether it occurs at the top level of a module or not. Konrad. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
