Thanks for educating me about tags--didn't know it would work like that.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Michael Wood wrote:
> On 25 January 2013 13:47, Wes Freeman wrote:
>
>> I don't tend to filter emails, but just like to go through my inbox and
>> judge based on topic and subject whether I
On 25 January 2013 13:47, Wes Freeman wrote:
> I don't tend to filter emails, but just like to go through my inbox and
> judge based on topic and subject whether I'd like to take a closer look
> before archiving. I'm in too many groups to want to go through filters one
> at a time, and currently
I don't tend to filter emails, but just like to go through my inbox and
judge based on topic and subject whether I'd like to take a closer look
before archiving. I'm in too many groups to want to go through filters one
at a time, and currently there a handful that don't have subject markers,
so unl
On Jan 25, 1:55 pm, Samrat Man Singh wrote:
> I'd suggest considering Librelist for the mailing list too. I'm subscribed
> to a few mailing lists powered by it and never seen a spam problem.
I would vote against such a thing, unless there is a way to (1) read
the messages in RSS reader, and (2)
I'd suggest considering Librelist for the mailing list too. I'm subscribed
to a few mailing lists powered by it and never seen a spam problem.
Leiningen is using it
too-
http://librelist.com/browser//leiningen/2012/10/25/moving-to-librelist/#1c0e8108daa50a6925b21fe69c8b7f13
Anyways, if you sti
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:50 -0500, Wes Freeman wrote:
> This is great. Can you guys put [ClojureScript] in the email subject like most
> google groups do? Wouldn't mind if they put [Clojure] in the clojure emails,
> either.
Just curious: But why would you want that? I would happily live without
This is great. Can you guys put [ClojureScript] in the email subject like
most google groups do? Wouldn't mind if they put [Clojure] in the clojure
emails, either.
Wes
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:22 AM, kinleyd wrote:
> I see a number of volunteers already; include me if you need any more.
>
> +1
I see a number of volunteers already; include me if you need any more.
+1 to the proposal to have an independent ClojureScript group.
On Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:42:22 AM UTC+6, solussd wrote:
>
> I'll help!
>
> ---
> Joseph Smith
> j...@uwcreations.com
> @solussd
>
>
> On Jan 23, 2013, at 8
I'll help!
---
Joseph Smith
j...@uwcreations.com
@solussd
On Jan 23, 2013, at 8:16 PM, Brandon Bloom wrote:
> /me steps forward
>
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:53:34 AM UTC-8, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>>
>> An interest was expressed by a few in having a separate ClojureScript
>> mailing
/me steps forward
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:53:34 AM UTC-8, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> An interest was expressed by a few in having a separate ClojureScript
> mailing list.
>
> If it is a Google group, that requires moderating messages sent to the
> group, via manual approval. I suspect
Happy to help - FrankS.
On Jan 23, 2013, at 10:53 AM, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> An interest was expressed by a few in having a separate ClojureScript mailing
> list.
>
> If it is a Google group, that requires moderating messages sent to the group,
> via manual approval. I suspect early on ther
I'd be up for it as well.
- Chris
--
Christopher Meiklejohn
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert Pitts wrote:
> I'd be up for helping.
>
> On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:53:34 PM UTC-5, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
> > An interest was expressed by a few in having a separate Clojure
I'd be up for helping.
On Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:53:34 PM UTC-5, Andy Fingerhut wrote:
>
> An interest was expressed by a few in having a separate ClojureScript
> mailing list.
>
> If it is a Google group, that requires moderating messages sent to the
> group, via manual approval. I sus
13 matches
Mail list logo
