Thanks for educating me about tags--didn't know it would work like that. On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 January 2013 13:47, Wes Freeman <freeman....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I don't tend to filter emails, but just like to go through my inbox and >> judge based on topic and subject whether I'd like to take a closer look >> before archiving. I'm in too many groups to want to go through filters one >> at a time, and currently there a handful that don't have subject markers, >> so unless something obviously Clojure-related is in the subject, I have to >> dig deeper to know that it's actually about Clojure. If you guys don't want >> to do it, I'm fine with continued suffering (I guess I'm a minority)--just >> throwing the idea out there. >> >> Thanks for doing it in the ClojureScript group, by the way. :) >> > > You have a gmail account. You can set up filters to tag the e-mails. It > does not mean you have to "go through filters one at a time". Your mail > can still all be in your inbox and the tags will be to the left of the > subject. > > Anybody who wants to separate the mail into separate folders (virtual or > otherwise) can do so without cluttering the subject. People who read mail > on devices with small screens can get a bit extra space for the actual > subject instead of having "[Clojurescript] " taking up large chunk of it. > > Anyway, I don't feel strongly enough about it to try to get the > Clojurescript list changed. > > >> Wes >> >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Wolodja Wentland <babi...@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 01:50 -0500, Wes Freeman wrote: >>> > This is great. Can you guys put [ClojureScript] in the email subject >>> like most >>> > google groups do? Wouldn't mind if they put [Clojure] in the clojure >>> emails, >>> > either. >>> >>> Just curious: But why would you want that? I would happily live without >>> that >>> as it reduces line-noise and leaves more room for important information >>> such >>> as the actual subject. It is not necessary to filter mails (just filter >>> on >>> List-I[dD]) either, so I'd be curious why you would prefer it :) >>> -- >>> Wolodja <babi...@gmail.com> >>> >> > -- > Michael Wood <esiot...@gmail.com> > > -- > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
