Miki,
We do have functions to normalize and convert path and I just think the
dirname function should not do the conversion. In fact there's no benefits
to do so as /a/b/c on *nix is not equal to \a\b\c in window, same goes for
c:\a\b\c in window for c:/a/b/c in *nix. In 99.99% percent of th
Greetings,
(dirname "/a/b/c") should return "/a/b/" on both win and unix
>
You can use fs/*separator for that:
user=> (binding [fs/*separator* ":"] (fs/join "a" "b" "c"))
"a:b:c"
However users expect the path to be right depending on the OS, meaning \ on
windows and / on *nix.
HTH,
--
Miki,
Thanks for the quick response, but I'm not just looking for a fix for the
testcase, I'm looking for the dirname function to return the same output
regardless of the machine that the code is running on, eg
(dirname "/a/b/c") should return "/a/b/" on both win and unix
just like the getFull
I *think* it's fixed, can you test with the latest sources in bitbucket?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient w
Greetings,
The dirname testcase fails on Window. Does it make sense that even if
> it's running on window it should still pass? In another word, don't you
> think that it should not convert the separator implicitly?
>
I agree with you, and I'll try to fix the test. However I don't have acces
Hi Miki,
The dirname testcase fails on Window. Does it make sense that even if
it's running on window it should still pass? In another word, don't you
think that it should not convert the separator implicitly?
(deftest dirname-test (is (= (dirname "/a/b/c") "/a/b")))
user=> (fs/dirname "/
Perfec! Thanks a lot
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group
> We are planning to use this file system utilities, and we need a function
> to get file extension. Currently we're using apache common for that, but we
> want to get rid of apache common altogether. Can you add this functionality
> to the fs.clj? Thx
>
> Added in 0.7.1 (thanks to Steve Mi
I've been using this to get the extension:
(defn extension [file]
(when file
(let [base (fs/basename file)
dot (.lastIndexOf ^String base ".")]
(when (pos? dot)
(subs base (inc dot))
Steve Miner
On Mar 15, 2011, at 5:56 PM, siyu798 wrote:
> Hi Miki,
> We are
Hi Miki,
We are planning to use this file system utilities, and we need a function
to get file extension. Currently we're using apache common for that, but we
want to get rid of apache common altogether. Can you add this functionality
to the fs.clj? Thx
Si Yu
--
You received this message b
> -I'd rather (copy-tree src dest) worked like "cp -R src dest" (including
> when dest doesn't exist) rather than "cp -R src/* dest/".
>
Done in 0.6.0.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@go
>
> -I'd rather (copy-tree src dest) worked like "cp -R src dest" (including
> when dest doesn't exist) rather than "cp -R src/* dest/".
>
> I agree, working on that.
> -It would be nice if functions that create files or dirs (like mkdir and
> touch) returned the new object's path, to allow ch
On Jan 19, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Miki wrote:
> I'd appreciate some comments about need functionality, bugs, code reviews and
> such.
Thanks for this useful library. Some suggestions:
-I'd rather (copy-tree src dest) worked like "cp -R src dest" (including when
dest doesn't exist) rather than "cp
There appears to be a bug in "walk" when there is an empty folder somewhere
beneath the specified directory. I've only tested this on Win XP but this
triggers a NullPointerException on fs 0.4.0:
(walk "c:/empty" (fn [& a] true))
No message.
[Thrown class java.lang.NullPointerException]
Re
>
> I have one question, is there any documentation available for the
> functions provided by fs? I would love a place where I could go to scan
> the available functions, other than the source code.
>
https://bitbucket.org/tebeka/fs/src
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
Hi,
Am 19.01.2011 um 21:24 schrieb B Smith-Mannschott:
> This is a retarded 'convention', and it isn't really much of a
> convention at that. Just because Clojure itself has a 'core.clj',
> doesn't mean everyone else needs one now too. I blame Leiningen's
> defaults. For counter-examples, take a
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 15:30, Rayne wrote:
> It isn't nearly as big a deal as you think it is. I'm guessing you have a
> single file called 'fs.clj' with the namespace 'fs', right?
> mkdir src/fs/
> mv src/fs.clj src/fs/core.clj
>
> and then edit the file and change the namespace to fs.core. Why
Miki writes:
>> It isn't nearly as big a deal as you think it is. I'm guessing you have a
>> single file called 'fs.clj' with the namespace 'fs', right?
>>
>> mkdir src/fs/
>> mv src/fs.clj src/fs/core.clj
>>
> and then edit the file and change the namespace to fs.core.
>
> I know it's easy to
> It isn't nearly as big a deal as you think it is. I'm guessing you have a
> single file called 'fs.clj' with the namespace 'fs', right?
>
> mkdir src/fs/
> mv src/fs.clj src/fs/core.clj
>
and then edit the file and change the namespace to fs.core.
>
I know it's easy to do, I just don't think
It isn't nearly as big a deal as you think it is. I'm guessing you have a
single file called 'fs.clj' with the namespace 'fs', right?
mkdir src/fs/
mv src/fs.clj src/fs/core.clj
and then edit the file and change the namespace to fs.core. Why is that such
a big deal? I understand that you're c
> First, I suggest that you look at the standard clojure.java.io package for
> some useful functions that are already in Clojure 1.2.
>
Done in 0.3.0 (as well as some other added functions), thanks again.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure"
> there is also this:
>
> https://github.com/jashmenn/clj-file-utils
>
Wasn't aware of this one, will have a look. At first glance it uses
common.io and I tried to depend on clojure only.
Thanks,
--
Miki
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" g
> First, I suggest that you look at the standard clojure.java.io package for
> some useful functions that are already in Clojure 1.2. In particular, you
> could use io/file instead of (File. xxx) in your code to add some
> flexibility to the kinds of things that can be treated as a "file". I
there is also this:
https://github.com/jashmenn/clj-file-utils
which seems to be very similar
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Steve Miner wrote:
> Thanks for shaing. I was just about to write several functions along these
> lines. I have a couple of comments.
>
> First, I suggest that you l
Thanks for shaing. I was just about to write several functions along these
lines. I have a couple of comments.
First, I suggest that you look at the standard clojure.java.io package for some
useful functions that are already in Clojure 1.2. In particular, you could use
io/file instead of (Fi
2011/1/13 Miki
> >> I'm missing something blindingly obvious. Where can I download this?
> > probably clojars.org (or by putting [fs "0.2.0-SNAPSHOT"] in your
> > project.clj if you're using lein...
> Yup, it's in clojars. However if you prefer to download the jar manually,
> you can
> get it fro
>> I'm missing something blindingly obvious. Where can I download this?
> probably clojars.org (or by putting [fs "0.2.0-SNAPSHOT"] in your
> project.clj if you're using lein...
Yup, it's in clojars. However if you prefer to download the jar manually,
you can
get it from https://bitbucket.org/tebe
probably clojars.org (or by putting [fs "0.2.0-SNAPSHOT"] in your
project.clj if you're using lein...
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Tim Visher wrote:
> I'm missing something blindingly obvious. Where can I download this?
>
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Miki wrote:
>> [fs "0.2.0-SNAPSHOT"
I'm missing something blindingly obvious. Where can I download this?
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Miki wrote:
> [fs "0.2.0-SNAPSHOT"] is out, featuring:
>
> abspath
> Return absolute path
> basename
> Return the last part of path
> copy
> Copy a file
> cwd
> Return the current
Good stuff, just what I was looking for, can't wait to try...
sent from my mobile device
On Jan 12, 2011 9:48 PM, "Miki" wrote:
> [fs "0.2.0-SNAPSHOT"] is out, featuring:
>
> abspath
> Return absolute path
> basename
> Return the last part of path
> copy
> Copy a file
> cwd
> Return the current
30 matches
Mail list logo
