Hi, Am 19.01.2011 um 21:24 schrieb B Smith-Mannschott:
> This is a retarded 'convention', and it isn't really much of a > convention at that. Just because Clojure itself has a 'core.clj', > doesn't mean everyone else needs one now too. I blame Leiningen's > defaults. For counter-examples, take a look at clojure-contrib. The > only core.clj in there is for proposed additions to clojure.core > itself. Hmm… Wasn't the „main“ reason of technical nature? Namely classes in the default package? Which cause problems in Java world? Sincerely Meikel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
