Proposal and patch welcome!
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
>> In either case, I think it would be great if something along the lines of
>> clj-stacktrace (or even clojure.stacktrace, as a first step) were baked into
>> the REPL in the next version of Clojure. This is a un
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
> In either case, I think it would be great if something along the lines of
> clj-stacktrace (or even clojure.stacktrace, as a first step) were baked into
> the REPL in the next version of Clojure. This is a universal pain point.
Agreed.
I was
> In either case, I think it would be great if something along the lines of
> clj-stacktrace (or even clojure.stacktrace, as a first step) were baked into
> the REPL in the next version of Clojure. This is a universal pain point.
Seconded.
On Jul 9, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Chas Emerick wrote:
> Th
There are some utilities in clojure.stacktrace that are helpful with
gnarly stacktraces (http://richhickey.github.com/clojure/clojure.stacktrace-api.html
). Various people have tinkered with more sophisticated "stacktrace
interpreters" of late; clj-stacktrace is the most notable that I've
h
Hi!
I try to use clojure, and get problems with understanding what's-
going-on with this awful backtraces. Is there any way to make this
traces useful?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@goog
