On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: > In either case, I think it would be great if something along the lines of > clj-stacktrace (or even clojure.stacktrace, as a first step) were baked into > the REPL in the next version of Clojure. This is a universal pain point.
Agreed. I was actually planning on suggesting this once 1.2 was released. In our project at work we already re-def clojure.stacktrace/print-cause-trace to clj-stacktrace.repl/pst since it's basically a drop-in replacement. It's been a great improvement over the stock stacktrace tools. I've talked to Mark, the author, and it sounded like he'd be willing to contribute it. Right now I think clojure.test is the main user of the clojure.stacktrace namespace, and clj-stacktrace works great with that, but obviously we'll need to check against other libraries to ensure there aren't any compatibility issues there. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
