Proposal and patch welcome! > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Chas Emerick <cemer...@snowtide.com> wrote: >> In either case, I think it would be great if something along the lines of >> clj-stacktrace (or even clojure.stacktrace, as a first step) were baked into >> the REPL in the next version of Clojure. This is a universal pain point. > > Agreed. > > I was actually planning on suggesting this once 1.2 was released. In > our project at work we already re-def > clojure.stacktrace/print-cause-trace to clj-stacktrace.repl/pst since > it's basically a drop-in replacement. It's been a great improvement > over the stock stacktrace tools. I've talked to Mark, the author, and > it sounded like he'd be willing to contribute it. > > Right now I think clojure.test is the main user of the > clojure.stacktrace namespace, and clj-stacktrace works great with > that, but obviously we'll need to check against other libraries to > ensure there aren't any compatibility issues there. > > -Phil > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
