I think adding the generic sub-namespaces java, data, algo, tools, etc. is
unnecessary and confusing. How many libraries fit neatly in one of those
categories and not the other? Why use clojure.data.json when clojure.json
would suffice? More examples: clojure.cli, clojure.enlive, clojure.monads
Great site! Clean, simple, and very useful.
There's a missing 'n' at the end of the link to ring-basic-authentication.
The "Beta" label doesn't mean what it used to mean. Today, it's unflattering
and unnecessary to have it on display.
Thanks for doing this. You're awesome!
--
You received thi
Smack is the go to library for XMPP client programming on the JVM. It
has some quirks and annoying bugs, but it's versatile; it mostly
works, and it has excellent (simple!) documentation. Also, there is no
worthy free alternative available.
Docs: http://www.igniterealtime.org/builds/smack/docs/lat
For me as a user, the appeal of contrib was the bundling. I used to
just download the latest contrib jar, throw it in the classpath, and
have plenty of functionality that could be easily summoned using a
single line of code. Just like a standard library, even though it's
not officially standard. It
The greatest impediment for me is having to sign a contract to
participate in an open source project. I understand Rich Hickey and
most of you guys live in the litigious US and have to cover
yourselves, but I feel not right about this.
On Oct 19, 4:00 pm, Rich Hickey wrote:
> We are taking sever
Jason, this was very helpful. sorted-map's correct behavior compared
to the naive behavior of hash-map is what confused me. Thanks for
clearing this up.
On May 21, 6:31 am, Jason Wolfe wrote:
> The crux of the issue:
>
> user> (= (long 1) (int 1))
> true
> user> (.equals (long 1) (int 1))
> fals
I tried to use Long keys from the java.io.File/length method in a hash-
map and failed to retrieve values using them. sorted-map is fine. The
doc says hash-maps require keys that support .equals and .hashCode.
Doesn't Long support those or am I missing something else?
--
You received this message
Do people use the octal number format in Clojure programming (zero on
the left)?
(Have no idea what I'm talking about? You're not alone. Try this at
your REPL: (* 2 010). If you expected to get 20, welcome to the world
of octal numbers.)
It's confusing to read in source code because it's rare, no
Am I the only one driven mad by the new auto-appended signature to
every message in this group ("You received this message because you
are subscribed...")? It started on April 16th. Is there a way a
moderator can stop it?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Group
I mentioned in the first message that javaop should also be disabled
in a restricted eval.
On May 6, 5:18 pm, gary ng wrote:
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Mibu wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, clj-sandbox works by a set whitelist of
> > arbitrary functions, which is not
As far as I can tell, clj-sandbox works by a set whitelist of
arbitrary functions, which is not a very generic approach. It works
for sandboxes like clojurebot, but not for other stuff.
A restricted eval in all likelihood will not refer directly to
clojure.core, and it's much better allowing the c
So far I have delightfully used Clojure's reader-evaluator-printer to
store and load data, as an ad-hoc scripting language and command line
interface, as a configuration language, and as an RPC protocol. It's
all simple and great when those interfaces are trusted.
Now I want to do it with untruste
Congratulations Rich and everyone for 1.0!
Clojure really is remarkable, and people start to notice.
Today, when people want to know something new they first go to
Wikipedia before they even visit the homepage. There will be a lot of
new interest in Clojure now that it has reached 1.0.
Please h
Mark,
Thanks for the excellent article. Your Clojure page is a great
resource page too. Loved the Clojure Categorized. It's similar to what
Chouser started doing in the official docs. This categorizing and
tagging is tremendously helpful for understanding the "vocabulary" of
the language in the w
If you have to ask if a technology is production ready then it isn't.
On Apr 15, 10:34 pm, Aaron Feng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I work for a large financial software company, and we are interested
> in using Clojure for our new project. Due to the concurrent nature of
> the project, we are evaluating t
Joshua, my puzzlement is not with the first element but the last.
For example, the (range -1 2) gives (-1 0 1).
On Mar 4, 3:06 pm, Joshua Fox wrote:
> This is discussed, with references,
> herehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Array#Index_of_the_first_element
--~--~-~--~~~--
On Mar 4, 2:46 pm, Michael Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Mibu wrote:
> > Why does range in Clojure use an inclusive-exclusive range?
> For what it's worth, Python's range function works the same way.
I think Clojure's design leans towards what'
Why does range in Clojure use an inclusive-exclusive range?
I'm aware of the traditional substring range convention, which always
puzzled me as to how an unintuitive and error-prone use became
cemented as the norm.
I'm not calling for a change in range. I'm just genuinely curious.
--~--~---
Laziness is the bomb. Don't give up on it. ;-)
On Mar 2, 8:12 am, max3000 wrote:
> Thanks for the pointers. I was indeed able to make it work with
> dorun. ;)
>
> Still, I'm not sure I understand what all the fuss is about regarding
> laziness. I'll take your word for it for now but I hope to gr
doseq is the idiomatic way to write imperative code segments like this
(add-watch generates a side-effect). Nevertheless, I too love using
map for stuff like that. All you need to do is surround the map with
dorun (or doall if you need the return value) and it will force the
computation.
see: (do
comp.lang.lisp had a great Road to Clojure Survey thread which was
actually an x-is-better-than-y thread that turned into a full blown
flamewar.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.lisp/browse_thread/thread/0d05837df1efe075
These kind of threads are usually pointless, but this specific thre
For me, Clojure made programming exhilarating again.
Thank you, Rich and everyone else for making this happen.
On Feb 20, 9:59 pm, Rich Hickey wrote:
> There have been many new additions to the contributors list:
>
> http://clojure.org/contributing
>
> and many new donations:
>
> https://sourc
I'm all for breaking bad habits and names and I love it that you give
good design considerations precedence over heritage, but here I think
using the first/rest/next combo is confusing, and will continue to be
confusing in the long-term.
rest is expected to be a sequence by Lispers, and next is e
If you want to test your code, you can use the 50 sudokus from Project
Euler problem 96:
http://projecteuler.net/index.php?section=problems&id=96
You will have to register and log in to check your answer.
On Feb 6, 4:22 pm, Tzach wrote:
> Hi all
> As my first Clojure project, I decided to fina
At this point I think maybe a broader more abstract view is in order.
How about watchers for every mutable construct in Clojure?
On Feb 1, 7:12 am, Mark Fredrickson
wrote:
> I know its been discussed before, but I would like to register a
> request for a feature: watchers on namespaces. My ne
Check out the comment left by Blue Phil. Priceless.
On Jan 31, 6:40 am, Jon Harrop wrote:
> Apologies if you've seen this before but I just thought it was absolutely
> hillarious:
>
> http://www.3ofcoins.net/2009/01/30/common-lisp-clojure-and-seriousness/
>
> --
> Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Con
What do you think about adding these new reader macros:
!form => (complement form)
#!(...) => (fn [args] (complement (...)))
Two problems I see with these macros are the hassle to the reader with
names that include '!' (e.g. set!, swap!), and the possible confusion
of meaning with (not form) to
, psort, and par:map functions, but
I wasn't very successful. Anyone who knows what s/he's doing can shed
some light on how to use it with this example?
Mibu
P.S. psort and sort's arguments are inconsistent (psort [coll comp]
vs. sort [comp coll]).
On Dec 30, 3:56 pm, Piotr 'Qert
or (clojure.contrib...).
That's it. You've got spit.
Mibu
On Dec 28, 4:22 pm, Boyd Brown wrote:
> Hello. I can't seem to find 'spit'.
>
> java exception: unable to resolve symbol spit.
>
> I'm using Clojure Box rev1142. Tried using the cloju
Is there a way to sort a sorted-map-by by value without a letrec?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from thi
on. But again, I was being idiomatic. If
you need a blazing fast implementation for this specific task, I
suspect perl would be a better choice.
Mibu
On Dec 26, 7:11 pm, Piotr 'Qertoip' Włodarek
wrote:
> On Dec 25, 4:58 pm, Mibu wrote:
>
> > My version:
>
> &
c (%1 %2 0)) }) {}
(map #(.toLowerCase %)
(re-seq #"\w+"
(slurp input-filename)
Mibu
On Dec 25, 2:16 pm, Piotr 'Qertoip' Włodarek
wrote:
> Given the input text
I'd write it this way:
(apply + (mapcat #(range 1 %) (range 2 14)))
I think idiomatically I would have written it with (partial range 1)
instead of #(range 1 %), but I prefer compact forms.
Mibu
On Dec 24, 8:57 pm, MattyDub wrote:
> I was presented with the question "How many
On Dec 18, 2:37 pm, janus wrote:
> I think I need a mentor!
Come to the IRC channel (#clojure on irc.freenode.net). The people
there are friendly, helpful, and surprisingly patient.
Mibu
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscri
all did. Unfortunately, not so with a central repo for external
libraries.
If anyone is interested in the subject of why excess choice is bad, I
highly recommend this short and very thought-provoking talk by Barry
Schwartz:
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/barry_schwartz_on_the_paradox_of_choice.
epo), useful links, and
maybe general thoughts about where this is all going, which I'm sure
all are interested in.
Mibu
[1] http://d2nbqsesuabw8o.cloudfront.net/tmp/doc-1116/index.html
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribe
Is it possible to remove the asserts in derive that restrict the
parent and child to namespace-qualified names?
It would be much more useful if the asserts are moved to the global-
hierarchy case ([child parent]) and the "private" hierarchies ([h
child parent]) can do as they wish. Maybe ditch th
, not even for intellectual
property. I just think "free" software licenses are useless at best
and counterproductive at worst when applied to projects that are
supposed to be free.
About the flame war thingy, it's with a tongue-in-cheek.
Mibu
--~--~-~--~~~
needed at all for a
free project? It's like inventing a new programming language and
debating how you should retrofit it with OOP features because all the
other cool languages do it.
Mibu
(Too idealistic? Hey, it's a flame war. Just playing by the rules...)
--~--~-~--~---
f gasoline to the fire.
Aside from that invigorating entry to this group, I must say Clojure
looks so good, I can't remember when I felt so excited and hopeful
about a new piece of technology. Thanks for making this happen with or
without those stupid licenses.
Mibu
--~--~-~--~~--
40 matches
Mail list logo
