Why does range in Clojure use an inclusive-exclusive range?

I'm aware of the traditional substring range convention, which always
puzzled me as to how an unintuitive and error-prone use became
cemented as the norm.

I'm not calling for a change in range. I'm just genuinely curious.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to