On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
> On Nov 20, 5:56 pm, HiHeelHottie wrote:
> > What do you recommend for logging, especially to a set of rolling
> > files? Simply use log4j?
>
> I manage with Log4j. The .properties configuration file is annoying
> sometimes, but it works.
>
This looks a *lot* like something I did a long time ago ("Data File
Disassembler") when I spent a lot of time reverse-engineering things. I had
a view/edit layer on top (On Mac, back when a Mac II was extreme hardware :)
and man, was it useful... had "pluggable" modules for microcontroller
disassem
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Daniel Bell wrote:
> I was curious as to exactly it means to parameterize a query. Is it
> a way to automatically insert arguments into the query, a way to
> destructure the results, or what?
The first of those, including SQL-quoting etc. Most JDBC tutorials
will
I thought there was some minor magic to get types in there though, wasn't
that one of the interesting things Rich pointed out at a recent NYC Clojure
meetup (Sept, maybe)?
Dave
On Nov 5, 2010 10:59 AM, "Kevin Downey" wrote:
> for defining an interface you should use definterface
>
> On Fri, Nov 5
JRebel is still the best answer. Loading a class at runtime is non- trivial.
I don't know how it deals with handling existing instances of the class,
though; I still think CLOS got that right.
Dave
On Nov 4, 2010 10:03 PM, "Seth" wrote:
> All i need to do is a function to reload a class I specif
--- On Thu, 12/18/08, Mibu wrote:
> An editor for a lisp language is not just a text editor for
> the source that you then compile. It's an environment that
> interacts with a REPL. So people can't just use whatever
> they've been using.
Of course you can--there's no *requirement* that your edit
-1
- Original Message
> From: Craig Andera
> To: clojure@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 7:51:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Clojure's code has moved to Google Code
>
>
> Does it makes sense to subscribe this group to those? I.e. to have
> commit messages appear here. I'v
--- On Tue, 12/16/08, kkw wrote:
> Since the Ant-built file is bigger, should I build
> using Ant instead of Maven?
It looks like the Ant build is compiling more; for example the Maven build
includes zip.clj, where the Ant build has all the zip%*.class files.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~---
--- On Mon, 12/15/08, CuppoJava wrote:
> And i get the message "Unable to resolve symbol:
> compile in this context" when i type "(compile)"
> at the REPL.
How are you running the REPL?
It's working for me whether I build with Ant or Maven, rev 1160.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~
Sneaky, but I bet I'll get confused by the extra functionality at some point.
--- On Sun, 12/14/08, Rich Hickey wrote:
> There used to be a long answer as to why:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure/msg/8fc6f0e9a5800e4b
>
> Now there is a short one - it does work!
--~--~-~--~-
--- On Sun, 12/14/08, David wrote:
> work> (.getName java.lang.Integer)
> ; Evaluation aborted.
>
> Why does the second expression fail?
Would that work in Java?
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group
--- On Sat, 12/13/08, Stephen Parker wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2008, at 23:10, Mark Fredrickson wrote:
>> [...] insert 3 before every item less than or equal to 5 in a seq:
>
> (def bar [24 6 5 5 7 5 8 2])
> (insert-before-if #(<= 5 %) 3 bar)
>
> => (3 24 3 6 3 5 3 5 3 7 3 5 3 8 2)
Er...
Dave
--~--
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Paul Barry wrote:
> syntactic sugar is not syntax?
I think that depends on which particular nits are being picked.
Is it strictly true that Clojure has "no syntax"? Meh--probably not.
(defun foo [bar] ...) has more unique characters than (defun foo (bar) ...) or
(define (
--- On Sun, 12/7/08, Michael Wood wrote:
> Is there an explanation that's a little smaller than 607MB?
The slides and the code?
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To post to this
--- On Sun, 12/7/08, Peter Wolf wrote:
> I'm a n00b, but isn't the point of this language to
> be *faster* than Java?...
I don't believe so. My impression was that the point was to be *better* than
Java by: being a Lisp, being functional, and allowing safe and easy
multithreading/concurrency.
--- On Sat, 12/6/08, janus wrote:
> It is my mistake, this is the error once again. Failed to
> load Main-Class manifest attribute from
> C:\clojure\clojure\clojure-contrib.jar.
> I did what Shulz said, however, I still have the same problem.
Can you post the *exact* classpath and/or files and/or
--- On Sat, 12/6/08, Julian Morrison wrote:
> A wrapper for neo4j, which is a non-relational database
> using [...] traversable relationships.
Hey, wait...
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Cl
--- On Sat, 12/6/08, Randall R Schulz wrote:
> On Saturday 06 December 2008 03:18, janus wrote:
>> I got" Failed to load Main-Class manifest attribute from C;/clojure/
>> clojure/clojure" when I tried to run clojure.
>
> Start by telling us precisely what you did to "run clojure." [...]
Plus I'm
--- On Tue, 12/2/08, Paul Barry wrote:
> Since this is just pure java, shouldn't it be the same on all 1.5
> JVMs? Would it be different on other JVM implementations? Just
> to verify, I checked on my Mac OS X 10.5 and in the Sun JDK
> 1.5 on Windows XP, and it does appear to be the same.
A Su
--- On Mon, 11/24/08, Stuart Sierra wrote:
> An interesting idea: hacking the Java compiler to perform
> source-code transformations:
> http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~akuhn/blog/2008/11/roman-numerals-in-your-java/
That's pretty cool, but not really a new idea--the JastAdd [1] and Polyglot [2]
compile
--- On Thu, 11/20/08, vdm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for getting a better wiki. Does anybody know of
> examples of open source projects using a Wiki well?
> Surely Clojure wouldn't be the first.
Some Apache projects (Struts 2, for example) use Confluence, and they have an
open source l
--- On Tue, 11/18/08, joejoe wrote:
> Yeah I got so fed up with trying to do it I
> almost gave up, then I found the (reverse string).
That doesn't actually do what your spec said, though.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subs
--- On Mon, 11/17/08, Drew Crampsie wrote:
> - projecture
Nice, because Clojure "sticks out" beyond Java/JVM, besides the other obvious
meanings
> - proj4cloj
Too hard to say.
> - clojforge, cloforj,
sourceforj?
> - forj
> - clojects
Source code coming out of the cloject; me likey.
>
--- On Mon, 11/17/08, Rich Hickey wrote:
> I've presented Clojure to many of the people who wrote
> CL and Scheme, and no one can deny it is a Lisp.
I'd also add that at Lisp50 Clojure was very well received by many Lisperati,
and many, if not most, of the folks there were *way* into Scheme and
--- On Mon, 11/17/08, Simon Brooke wrote:
> I admit I started without reading the documentation, but having got
> stuck I then read the documentation - both that at Clojure.org and
> that in the Wikibook - carefully. It didn't help.
I just don't see how that's possible, since somehow I've managed
I'll add that:
(cond (foo bar) (baz plugh)) => (cond (foo) (bar) (baz) (plugh))
This particular CL difference is listed on the wiki page you listed:
http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Clojure_Programming#Clojure_for_Common_Lisp_Programmers
I also didn't have anywhere near these kinds of problems get
--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Frantisek Sodomka wrote:
> [...]
> becomes:
>
> (deftest t-Symbols
>(check
> (:equal
>'abc (symbol "abc")
>'*+!-_? (symbol "*+!-_?")
>'abc:def:ghi (symbol "abc:def:ghi")
>'abc/def (symbol "abc" "def")
>'abc.def/ghi (symbol "ab
--- On Wed, 11/12/08, Mark Volkmann wrote:
> I don't seem to be able to access the special variables
> *1, *2, *3 and
> *e in the REPL. For example,
> user=> (/ 1 0)
> user=> (.printStackTrace *e)
> outputs
> java.lang.Exception: Unable to resolve symbol: *e in this context
In which environment/b
--- On Wed, 11/12/08, David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You're right. We don't. Not only that. I can't think how aget
> instead of [] (and all the similar verbosity, as it were) fits
> into "Almost no syntax" and "Core advantage still code-as-data and
> syntactic abstraction" of the "Lisp is a
--- On Sun, 11/9/08, Brian Doyle wrote:
> Yes, it is a StringBuilder so technically yes. I guess you
> since the only thing you ever do with a StringBuilder is produce a
> string it just seemed like it would be a string. Same goes for
> StringBuffer.
I'd say create your own (stringish? ...)
--- On Sun, 11/9/08, Brian Doyle wrote:
> This seems like a bug returning false for StringBuilder.
>
> user=> (string? (new java.lang.String
> "hello"))
> true
>
> user=> (string? (new java.lang.StringBuilder
> "hello"))
> false
Wouldn't it be a StringBuilder, and not a String?
user=> (. (new
31 matches
Mail list logo
