I thought there was some minor magic to get types in there though, wasn't
that one of the interesting things Rich pointed out at a recent NYC Clojure
meetup (Sept, maybe)?

Dave
On Nov 5, 2010 10:59 AM, "Kevin Downey" <redc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> for defining an interface you should use definterface
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Jeff Rose <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>  I'm trying to define an interface for our automated import system
>> written in Clojure so that we can use parsers implemented in Java.  So
>> far everything works great, but I'm wondering if there is any way to
>> get types into the method signatures in the interface.  For starters I
>> created a simple protocol:
>>
>>  (ns importer.parser)
>>
>>  (defprotocol Parser
>>    (parse ^java.util.Iterator [this ^java.lang.String path]))
>>
>> compiled it from the repl:
>>
>>  (compile 'importer.parser)
>>
>> and then when I decompile it using jd-gui I get this:
>>
>>  package importer.parser;
>>
>>  public abstract interface Parser
>>  {
>>    public abstract Object parse(Object paramObject);
>>  }
>>
>> It would be nice to have a tool that could inspect a Clojure namespace
>> and then generate Javadoc for the protocols and types.  Does something
>> like this already exist?  If that javadoc could specify the types,
>> even if under the hood it's using Object, that would also be fine.  Is
>> there a way to access this type hint information though?  I don't see
>> it in the importer.Parser map.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jeff
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>
>
>
> --
> And what is good, Phaedrus,
> And what is not good—
> Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<clojure%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to