Dear Max,
thank you very much for explanation :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To
I got latest version of your framework from Github and it works OK.
I am not sure if this is related to new settings in Facebook App page (I put
most of them to Disabled now) or some global change.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
T
Dear Max,
have there been some changes around Facebook authentication, because now it
seems as token that is returned is not valid?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note tha
Dear Laurent,
looks like this helped get the expected output of new version.
Thanks for prompt reply :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are
Dear all,
I have an issue with FatJar and Clojure/Eclipse/CCW.
I first perform *(compile* ... to get my file in *.class *form, and then
activate FatJar export and get a nice jar.
The issue is that when I run this jar, I get the same output as like before.
As if older version of the classes is
Dear Max,
this works like a charm.
Thank you very much for real fast response.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be pa
Hi Max,
I have started investigating this, and it works very nice.
I am a noob in Clojure/Java and I have a question about posting to FB using
your library. I tried something like this:
*(def auth-token (facebook-auth-by-name))
(def auth-name (first (keys auth-token)))
(with-facebook-auth-by-na
Dear all,
thanks for help and pointers.
Introduction of independent range instead of partitioned parts of lazy
sequence helped achieve parallelism (tested and works 4x faster (4 cores)
then normal version).
Here is the code (modified parts in bold):
(def range-end 2)
(def is-dividable
Dear all,
I have a simple mathematical problem which I want to use a sample for
parallelism.
My first question is if *partition* and *range *are lazy, does access to
lets say second part of partitioned range cause first part to be
materialized or no? Or is this using arithmetic progression in back
