On 4/9/12 9:10 PM, Cedric Greevey wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Andrew wrote:
Given a lazy sequence of numbers is there a way to interleave a constant and
get another lazy sequence? Say the first sequence is 1 2 3 4 ... I'd like
the second sequence to be 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0
Thanks i
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Andrew wrote:
> Given a lazy sequence of numbers is there a way to interleave a constant and
> get another lazy sequence? Say the first sequence is 1 2 3 4 ... I'd like
> the second sequence to be 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0
>
> Thanks in advance!
user=> (interpose 0 [1
I'm not sure if this is a problem with Safari/WebKit or ClojureScript (or
neither, maybe this is expected behavior).
I implemented the game logic of my Tempest game by threading a "game state"
structure through a long series of functions with the ->> macro.
At some point during development, i
And it's always good to give links with a project release:
Source:
https://github.com/halgari/clojure-py
Also via easy_install:
easy_install clojure-py
Timothy Baldridge
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send
I'm proud to announce the release of clojure-py 0.2!
There are numerous changes in this version, a few highlights:
* implemented deftype with protocol support
* implemented defprotocol and extend
* implemented reify
* implemented defrecord
* binding is supported
* implemented defmulti and defmeth
On 4/9/12 8:31 PM, Andrew wrote:
Given a lazy sequence of numbers is there a way to interleave a
constant and get another lazy sequence? Say the first sequence is 1 2
3 4 ... I'd like the second sequence to be 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0
Thanks in advance!
Yep, and it is even called interleave. :)
D o you want this?
user=> (def x (interleave (iterate inc 1) (repeat 0)))
#'user/x
user=> (take 10 x)
(1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0)
2012/4/10 Andrew
> Given a lazy sequence of numbers is there a way to interleave a constant
> and get another lazy sequence? Say the first sequence is 1 2 3 4 ... I'd
> lik
Given a lazy sequence of numbers is there a way to interleave a constant
and get another lazy sequence? Say the first sequence is 1 2 3 4 ... I'd
like the second sequence to be 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0
Thanks in advance!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
2012/4/9 rogerdpack
> So I guess my question is "is this all the overhead I'm likely to
> encounter" for startup times for projects in clojure? For large
> projects, what are typical load times? Just trying to figure out if
> clojure would work for my next project
>
An app that has dozens (40-
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Aaron Cohen wrote:
> I don't really like this feature, I wish the "not-found" version of invoke
> was only available by explicitly calling "get".
>
> It is however, documented, here: http://clojure.org/data_structures#Data
> Structures-Symbols
It would be nice if i
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Ulrik Sandberg wrote:
> There's a little toy rabbit called Karotz (karotz.com). It's the
> successor of the now discontinued Nabaztag, and it's actively being
> developed. Karotz has some cool features such as text-to-speach, voice
> recognition, camera, and media p
There's a little toy rabbit called Karotz (karotz.com). It's the
successor of the now discontinued Nabaztag, and it's actively being
developed. Karotz has some cool features such as text-to-speach, voice
recognition, camera, and media player. It can also change color and
move its ears. Lots of fun,
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Stuart Sierra
wrote:
> This is an undocumented feature for symbols, I think. I wouldn't rely on
> it too much.
> -S
I don't really like this feature, I wish the "not-found" version of invoke
was only available by explicitly calling "get".
It is however, documente
This is an undocumented feature for symbols, I think. I wouldn't rely on it
too much.
-S
On Monday, April 9, 2012 8:00:33 AM UTC-4, Aaron Cohen wrote:
>
> When symbols and keywords are in function position, (as you say) they look
> themselves up "in" the second argument. The third argument spec
(since we only have a small number of job postings on the list, I hope
it's OK to continue posting openings here... I guess we can all look
forward to the need for a separate clojure-jobs list!).
World Singles is looking for a smart, motivated developer to join our
small, fully distributed team of
I had a great discussion with Sean Corfield about this at ClojureWest, and
had my own visions for CloJARS. It'd be great to collaborate.
I like the idea of a full-fledged Maven repo. The convenience of something
like Grails BuildConfig.groovy to declare dependencies in one place, then
have Ivy or
Daniel Solano Gómez writes:
> Second, I revised my code yet again and ran it outside the profiler.
> I am finding that eval2 is at least an order of magnitude slower,
> somewhere around 20×.
Indeed, I can confirm that. :-)
Bye,
Tassilo
--
You received this message because you are subscribed t
On Mon Apr 9 14:07 2012, Daniel Solano Gómez wrote:
> On Mon Apr 9 18:54 2012, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> > To check that, I've created the simple benchmark below that runs the
> > current and enhanced implementation 10 million times with a evenly
> > distributed set of numbers, Booleans "created prop
Daniel Solano Gómez writes:
> Unfortunately, your methodology is flawed. The overhead of iterating
> through a list and converting the ints into objects is obscuring the
> perfomance difference between the two.
Well, yes, it was a quick shot.
> Running a modified version of the code (attached)
On Mon Apr 9 18:54 2012, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> To check that, I've created the simple benchmark below that runs the
> current and enhanced implementation 10 million times with a evenly
> distributed set of numbers, Booleans "created properly" with valueOf(),
> Booleans created with the constructor
Vinzent writes:
> That's interesting, thanks for your investigation! Then such decision
> was clearly made because Java is not the only JVM language, just as
> Luc said. For example, JRuby has its own class which wraps false:
> http://jruby.org/apidocs/org/jruby/RubyBoolean.False.html Obviously,
It's start-up time for jvm (plus classloading). In case of clojure
this is also additional time for loading runtime core library. Also,
in case of running source code - additional time for compilation.
There is no linear dependency from project size. If you would run
already compiled sources, boots
That's interesting, thanks for your investigation! Then such decision was
clearly made because Java is not the only JVM language, just as Luc said.
For example, JRuby has its own class which wraps false:
http://jruby.org/apidocs/org/jruby/RubyBoolean.False.html
Obviously, it's impossible to imple
Just had a question on startup times, if anybody has had experience
here:
I know (on my local box) clojure takes about 1.3s to "load"
C:\> cat yo.clj
(+ 1 2 3)
C:\>timer java -cp clojure-1.3.0.jar clojure.main yo.clj
1.347414
So I guess my question is "is this all the overhead I'm likely to
enco
sir (sorry for the late reply),
I read about garnet, and garnet in it self is a full blown Library to write
UI in lisp . Its a good tool to use and its a valuable tool to be in
Clojure community ( i think wort porting).
But the aim of this project is not that, it is to create just an API for
other
>>Feeling a bit slow...
It's not just you...the GSOC site is really poorly designed IMO. It
took me close to 5 minutes of clicking around to finally find the area
to sign up/select projects for mentoring.
Timothy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Cloj
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:54 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> You don't see a My Dashboard link?
I see; thanks. I was expecting proposals to be listed on the Clojure page.
-Phil
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send ema
You don't see a My Dashboard link?
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:17 AM, David Nolen
> wrote:
> > Yes apply to be a mentor - sorry it wasn't more clear - this could have
> been
> > done at anytime.
> >
> > Also important DO NOT associate yourse
"Jim - FooBar();" writes:
>> (= (Boolean. false) false) ;=> true
>>
>> now, that is really weird. By all means (at least those, I can come
>> up with ;-) it looks like false and (Boolean. false) are the same:
>
> I think when you use the = operator in Clojure it calls to the
> .equals() meth
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:17 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> Yes apply to be a mentor - sorry it wasn't more clear - this could have been
> done at anytime.
>
> Also important DO NOT associate yourself with a proposal in Confluence - you
> MUST do this in Melange.
Feeling a bit slow... I don't see any pr
Sorry, was my bad...
I was using clojure 1.2.1...
Il giorno venerdì 6 aprile 2012 13:04:35 UTC-5, Michael Klishin ha scritto:
>
> Simone Mosciatti:
>
> > (Do you need more info ???)
>
> Simone,
>
> Please post full exception instead of just "Error". If you can put
> together a small sample
> proj
That is all.
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group,
Yes apply to be a mentor - sorry it wasn't more clear - this could have
been done at anytime.
Also important DO NOT associate yourself with a proposal in Confluence -
you MUST do this in Melange.
DAvid
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Timothy Baldridge wrote:
> > Can I apply to be a mentor now?
> Can I apply to be a mentor now?
>
Ditto...I've done a fair amount of research on running clojure on
alternative platforms (C++, LLVM, python), so I feel I'd be up to
mentoring on any of the compiler projects (linter, func/cola,
optimizer, etc.). But I didn't know we still needed mentors until no
Can I apply to be a mentor now?
Regards,
BG
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:10 PM, David Nolen wrote:
> If this is not done by end of day we will likely have to reject the
> proposal. Sorry for the short notice - I'm new to the GSoC process and it
> seems Google would like us to move quickly.
>
>
> On
If this is not done by end of day we will likely have to reject the
proposal. Sorry for the short notice - I'm new to the GSoC process and it
seems Google would like us to move quickly.
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 9:28 AM, David Nolen wrote:
> If you are a mentor or said that you will be, you need to
If you are a mentor or said that you will be, you need to associate
yourself with a proposal in Melange ASAP.
Thanks,
David
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts
I'll answer only C, since other letters are either irrelevant or do not
contradict my points.
> C) ... By which universal law these two things should be considered equal
> ?
>
Um, that's what my complaint is all about, no? I have no idea by which law
these two things are considered equal, an
Hello.
My name is Andrew and I'm a student from Minsk (Belarus).
I've decided to participate in this year's GSoC.
I want to contribute in Clojars system. I've talked to Phil
(technomancy) about plans of Clojars future development. With his
help, i've wrote a proposal and posted it to google-melan
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:53:17AM -0700, Steven Obua wrote:
> [...] Nevertheless, somehow Boolean objects seem to creep into live,
> and I have code like that:
>
> (if (:leaf m-node)
>
> ...
> )
>
> that breaks because of it. I am using from the github repository
> ( 14428c296de483e
This is some cool stuff, I'll have to poke through the code later.
I've never played tempest, so I don't know what's supposed to happen,
but it was interesting to just move towards the focal point and let
the flippers pile up around the edges.
On Mar 22, 7:14 pm, Trevor Bentley wrote:
> I'm teach
Aaaa ok, it makes sense now...
Thanks a lot!
Jim
On 09/04/12 13:00, Aaron Cohen wrote:
When symbols and keywords are in function position, (as you say) they
look themselves up "in" the second argument. The third argument
specifies a not-found value. Since "1" isn't a collection, it will
alwa
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:54 AM, Jim - FooBar(); wrote:
> Hello everyone...
>
> Can somebody please provide some insight as to why
> (`+ 1 2) => 2 and
> ('+ 1 2) => 2 ???
>
> Thanks in advance...
>
> Jim
>
> ps. I understand that symbols are functions that look themselves up in
> sequences but he
Hello everyone...
Can somebody please provide some insight as to why
(`+ 1 2) => 2 and
('+ 1 2) => 2 ???
Thanks in advance...
Jim
ps. I understand that symbols are functions that look themselves up in
sequences but here i'm not passing a seq - instead i'm passing 2 args!
Shouldn't there be
On 08/04/12 21:05, Stefan Kamphausen wrote:
Hi,
(= (Boolean. false) false) ;=> true
now, that is really weird. By all means (at least those, I can come
up with ;-) it looks like false and (Boolean. false) are the same:
I think when you use the = operator in Clojure it calls to the .equ
A) JVM does not = Java, that's the biggest misunderstanding that pours from
all your posts. Read carefully the text on the page you referenced.
Clojure shares JVM facilities, types, gcc, and happens to allow you
to call Java...
B) JVM data types are of two kinds, primitive ones (bo
46 matches
Mail list logo
