Hi Phil,
We use Eclipse/CCW, not much choices here, we have a mixed language app and
as I age I have less memory space for different dev tools :)
I'll ask Stuart if he has any plans for this.
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 20:37:36 -0700
Phil Hagelberg wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Luc Prefonta
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Luc Prefontaine
wrote:
> So the only thing left on my list is c.c.trace. Any ideas of the future plans
> ?
> Need a volunteer ? Is there a bigger plan to regroup dev utilities ?
Personally I've found Slime's tracing to be a suitable replacement for
c.c.trace. It h
Sorry, what I meant to say in the last line is:
And as long as you start emacs somewhere in your lein project directory (or
"M-x cd" to it), you'll automatically be dropped into the main namespace (if
you have one defined via :main in project.clj), and the other project
namespaces will be avail
You can set "lein repl" as your inferior lisp program via:
M-x describe-variable
inferior-lisp-program
And as long as you start emacs somewhere in your lein project directory (or
"M-x cd" to it), you'll have all the libraries loaded in your REPL buffer.
On Thursday, September 1, 2011 11:03:13 A
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Luc Prefontaine
wrote:
> So the only thing left on my list is c.c.trace. Any ideas of the future plans
> ?
Stuart Sierra may chip in since he seems to have been the author of that?
It does look useful.
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View --
Thanx
I crossed another list in a different page stating the new names and structures
but did not find
this one. I'll keep the bookmark.
So the only thing left on my list is c.c.trace. Any ideas of the future plans ?
Need a volunteer ? Is there a bigger plan to regroup dev utilities ?
Luc
On S
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Luc Prefontaine
wrote:
> Being curious I checked references to contrib in our code base.
> Anyone knows what will happen to clojure.contrib.def and
> clojure.contrib.trace ?
According to http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Contrib+Library+Names
some of c.c.def w
Good news! The FAQ mentions that any programming language will do.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:47 PM, wrote:
> As most of you probably already know, Peter Norvig and S. Thrun will offer
> a free online intro to AI class in the Fall. The problem is that it will
> probably require Python since the th
Thanks. I am getting some slime errors unfortunately. I'll have to track
that down.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Paul Nakata wrote:
> On Thursday, September 1, 2011 10:03:13 AM UTC-7, melipone wrote:
>>
>> I do like "lein repl" on the command line. How can I have that in emacs?
>> Basically,
Being curious I checked references to contrib in our code base.
Anyone knows what will happen to clojure.contrib.def and clojure.contrib.trace ?
Luc P.
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 15:43:06 -0700 (PDT)
Lee Hinman wrote:
> I recommend the lein-multi plugin for testing against multiple
> versions of Clojur
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Lee Hinman wrote:
> I recommend the lein-multi plugin for testing against multiple
> versions of Clojure: https://github.com/maravillas/lein-multi
>
> Makes it easy to make sure you continue to support both 1.2 and 1.3
> for a while.
Good idea.
One thing that folk
On Sep 3, 2011, at 5:29 PM, nchurch wrote:
>
> I've edited the page a little bit to make it less prescriptive towards
> Clooj.
>
> http://dev.clojure.org/display/doc/Getting+Started+for+Beginners
I like the revision too.
> I'm not even
> sure we should put up labrepl, because there are no ins
I recommend the lein-multi plugin for testing against multiple
versions of Clojure: https://github.com/maravillas/lein-multi
Makes it easy to make sure you continue to support both 1.2 and 1.3
for a while.
On Sep 3, 1:27 pm, Chris Granger wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> With the release of 1.3 growing e
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Colin Yates wrote:
> Getting started should be the smallest set of steps possible; the REPL.
http://try-clojure.org is probably the very simplest step. Nothing to
download or install and it has a built in tutorial. And that is the
very first step on Nick's suggest
You can also put a commented out example call of the function, like this:
(defn some-magic [spells wizards]
...)
; (some-magic 5 [:gendalf :einstein])
Which is also handy for quick evaluation in the REPL.
Or you can put these example calls in the (automatic) test code.
--
You received this mes
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 13:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
HamsterofDeath wrote:
> this might seem like a stupid question, but for me, not knowing the
> type of something is like being stuck in a dead end for anything non
> trivial.
It's not stupid, it's normal :)
In functional programming, most of the time you w
> 2. Fun stuff to do with the basic repl
> - some swing stuff
> - copy and pastable code snippets
> - some parallel stuff with futures or pmap or something
> - something with the stm
> - agents are cool, right?
> - links to 4clojure and project euler
Kevin
I think
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Tal Liron wrote:
>
> I always ask, though, why people think they need async I/O for a web
> server. Async might be important if you are streaming video, audio, etc.
> (And if you are, you're probably better off with a robust CDN.)
>
Async can also be good for chat
On Sep 3, 1:36 pm, Mark Rathwell wrote:
> > I prefer to use ^{:dynamic true} instead of ^:dynamic, unless you're
> > recommending intentionally breaking compatibility with 1.2 so as to
> > encourage people to move to 1.3.
>
> What is meant by "breaking compatibility"? I haven't noticed any
> issu
And in flattening a list (by hand, not using flatten), why it important to
check for sequential instead of seq and where can I read about that?
I understand one answer. That is all seqs are sequential. But is there more
discussion on this?
Thanks.
cmn
--
You received this message because you ar
this might seem like a stupid question, but for me, not knowing the
type of something is like being stuck in a dead end for anything non
trivial. i've made a few little experiments with clojure (not much,
just testing some features) and i see how powerful clojure can be -
for small to medium sized
On Sep 3, 3:13 pm, Alan Malloy wrote:
> I prefer to use ^{:dynamic true} instead of ^:dynamic, unless you're
> recommending intentionally breaking compatibility with 1.2 so as to
> encourage people to move to 1.3.
Presumably you would be doing this on a 1.3 branch of your code.
--
You received t
> I prefer to use ^{:dynamic true} instead of ^:dynamic, unless you're
> recommending intentionally breaking compatibility with 1.2 so as to
> encourage people to move to 1.3.
What is meant by "breaking compatibility"? I haven't noticed any
issues using ^:dynamic with 1.2, am I missing something?
(= (seq v) (distinct v)) will short-circuit as soon as an inequality
is found.
On Sep 3, 12:47 pm, Meikel Brandmeyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 03.09.2011 um 19:30 schrieb Despite:
>
> > So, you want to make sure each value in the vector is unique? My
> > first thought was to put them into a set, then
I prefer to use ^{:dynamic true} instead of ^:dynamic, unless you're
recommending intentionally breaking compatibility with 1.2 so as to
encourage people to move to 1.3.
On Sep 3, 12:27 pm, Chris Granger wrote:
> Hey Folks,
>
> With the release of 1.3 growing ever nearer, it's time that we as a
>
Hi,
Am 03.09.2011 um 19:30 schrieb Despite:
> So, you want to make sure each value in the vector is unique? My
> first thought was to put them into a set, then see if the set was
> equal to the vector, but clojure's equality doesn't allow for that.
> And if you put the set back into a vector, yo
Hey Folks,
With the release of 1.3 growing ever nearer, it's time that we as a
community do everything we can to make the migration smooth. In general,
this means relatively simple changes to the libs under your control, but I
also think we should take this opportunity to do some house cleaning.
user> (map (juxt seq? sequential?) '([1 2] (1 2)))
([false true] [true true])
All seqs are sequential, but not all sequential things are seqs.
On Sep 3, 12:14 pm, octopusgrabbus wrote:
> I've noticed that solutions to rolling your own Clojure flatten involve the
> sequential? function rather tha
On Sep 3, 2011, at 2:58 PM, Colin Yates wrote:
>
> My semi-serious point is that as a beginner the question being answered is
> more like "what is it all about" and "how can I try these samples/examples"
> rather than "how do I do 'proper' enterprise development with this". The
> best answer
I have seen the three current books on Clojure. They are all good general
books that describe the whole language. I have not had a chance to see Chas
Emerick's new Clojure O'Reilly book, so cannot comment on that.
Are there any books available or upcoming that concentrate more on Lisp
programmi
2011/9/3 Colin Yates
> For me, unlearning 15 years of OO and Java/j2ee makes a trifle thing like a
> new environment a walk in the park :)
>
> My semi-serious point is that as a beginner the question being answered is
> more like "what is it all about" and "how can I try these samples/examples"
>
For me, unlearning 15 years of OO and Java/j2ee makes a trifle thing like a
new environment a walk in the park :)
My semi-serious point is that as a beginner the question being answered is
more like "what is it all about" and "how can I try these samples/examples"
rather than "how do I do 'proper'
Sean, I agree with you, of course
2011/9/3 Sean Corfield
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Downey wrote:
> > I spent a lot of time on a windows netbook writing solutions to euler
> > project problems notepad++ and just pasting the functions into a repl
> > running in a console. It worked
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Kevin Downey wrote:
> I spent a lot of time on a windows netbook writing solutions to euler
> project problems notepad++ and just pasting the functions into a repl
> running in a console. It worked great.
Yup, and that's just fine _for you_ but you are not the tar
On Sep 2, 4:48 pm, ax2groin wrote:
> That's what I get for posting a question while feeding a 1-year-old
> child and getting ready to leave for lunch.
>
> I was trying to put together a (for) construct to output the
> combinations of a set, and my logic was flawed.
>
> Here's what I really wanted
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Alex Baranosky
wrote:
> Sounds like you want a function such as:
>
> none=
...which could be written as #(not-any? #{1} [1 2 3])
--Chouser
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send
Hi,
Am 03.09.2011 um 15:22 schrieb Nils Bertschinger:
> Thus, I have to either re-bind *ns* or use one of the bound-fn forms:
Or use syntax-quote (`) instead of normal quote ('). quote is in 95% of the
cases not what you want.
Sincerely
Meikel
--
You received this message because you are sub
Sounds like you want a function such as:
none=
On Sep 3, 2011 4:30 AM, "Vijay Lakshminarayanan"
wrote:
> ax2groin writes:
>
>> This code doesn't return the value I intuitively expect:
>>
>> user=> (not= 1 2 1)
>> true
>>
>> When I write that, I was expecting the equivalent of (and (= 1 2) (= 1
>
On Sep 3, 2:35 am, Brian Goslinga wrote:
> The future is probably executing in a different thread, so the dynamic
> binding of *ns* probably isn't the user namespace.
Thanks Brian. That's exactly what happens:
user> (future *ns*)
#
user> (deref *1)
#
Thus, I have to either re-bind *ns* or use o
I think the closer we get to recommending the equivalent of DrRacket for
Racket, the better.
Clooj has that "lightweight" feel, like DrRacket. It's not intimidating, and
the basics are laid out in front of you.
I've never used a command line REPL for Clojure that didn't suck in some
way. I'd want
Can someone explain please what class threads are?? And whether is threads
are expensive depends on the is
On Sep 3, 2011 5:09 AM, "Raoul Duke" wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:20 AM, billh2233 wrote:
>> I like Node.js's non-blocking IO for performance reasons, though it is
>> built around a
ax2groin writes:
> This code doesn't return the value I intuitively expect:
>
> user=> (not= 1 2 1)
> true
>
> When I write that, I was expecting the equivalent of (and (= 1 2) (= 1
> 1)), but the macro expansion is essentially (not (= 1 2 1)).
If you were expecting (not (and (= 1 2) (= 1 1)
42 matches
Mail list logo
