Donovan Craig wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis & Exim etc.. on a Debian woody/sarge mixed system.
When I go to install clamav, I get the following:
--->
Setting up clamav-freshclam (0.65-2) ...
Starting database update
It takes freshclam ~3min to timeout and
Donovan Craig wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis & Exim etc.. on a Debian woody/sarge mixed system.
Here's a temp solution using the debian way:
Add this to /etc/apt/preferences
Package: clamav
Pin: version 0.65-1
Pin-Priority: 1001
Package: clamav-base
Pin: version 0.65
Donovan Craig wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis & Exim etc.. on a Debian woody/sarge mixed system.
When I go to install clamav, I get the following:
Just found, with my last post (about /etc/apt/preferences) you may want
to add identical lines for clamav-freshclam and
Starbane wrote:
Donovan Craig wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis & Exim etc.. on a
Debian woody/sarge mixed system.
When I go to install clamav, I get the following:
Just found, with my last post (about /etc/apt/preferences) you may want
Last note on this
Thomas Lamy wrote:
The bug is actually in libclamav1_0.65-2, so it should be sufficient to
pinpoint that one.
Imagine my chagrin when I found that. ;)
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Deve
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Is there another AV that has apt? AFAIK most vendors provide generic
linux binary, not Debian binary.
Bitdefender seems to provide .debs, anyway. Not as good as APT, (dpkg
-i, I may as well run RPM at that point) but it's better than
downloading a binary and dealing wit
Thomas Lamy wrote:
Starbane wrote:
Starbane wrote:
Donovan Craig wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to install clamav 0.65-2 with amavis & Exim etc.. on a
Debian woody/sarge mixed system.
When I go to install clamav, I get the following:
Just found, with my last post (about /etc/apt/prefere
Antony Stone wrote:
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:23 am, Carles Xavier Munyoz Baldó wrote:
Hi,
I have received a notification that a new variation of Worm.SCO.A called
Doomjuice.A is about to appear.
Any news about it ?
Is the Doomjuice.A virus signature in the ClamAV last Virus DataBase update?
I had this exact same problem when a filter was interfering with
freshclam's virus def downloads. Seems Dansguardian content filter sees
the virus definition files as threatening. When adding the ip of the
freshclam-er, downloads went fine. IMO, the error message is a little
too vague to qui
I was recently using clamscan on cli to scan -m /home/*/Maildir, because
of some odd problems with sockets causing clamdscan to segfault on my
mail gateway (which probably allowed some Worm.SCO.A files through,
since we've been getting so many lately).
On one particular email, clamscan would s
After compiling 0.67, the segfault has gone away. After I wiped the
egg off my face, I felt much better.
Kudos to the ClamAV project team once again! :)
---
SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
Build and deploy apps & We
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 at 22:34:09 -0700, Starbane wrote:
[...]
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 41374
^
You've got some superfluous database files.
There are only 20718 signatures currently.
Maybe you've got old format database
Tommy McNeely wrote:
Just curious... I have all these Outlook users who claim they need "TNEF"
files to not be blocked anymore, does clamav directly un-encode them for
scanning, or do I need to get a perl module or external executable?
Ask your Outlook users what they think the TNEF attachments do,
Duron 1ghz Debian Linux sid, 2.6.2 kernel.
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 8566
Time: 647.872 sec (10 m 47 s)
only 13 or 14 viruses a second. Ah well.
Andrey Cherezov wrote:
clamd+clamDscan under Windows 2003 PIII/1GHz
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Infected files: 761
Considering the speed at which this was added to the database (and the
last three major mail worms that got treated similarly) I'm just
terribly impressed with the ClamAV devs.
So far, Clamav has beaten our proprietary av solution (InoculateIT, or
eTrust Antivirus, or whatever CA is calling it
russ wrote:
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 12:21, P.V.Anthony wrote:
The only diffrence I can see is that on machine A I installed clamav 0.65
then installed 0.67.
So what part of "0.67 works better and I should install it on machine A"
are you missing?
Is there anything else I can do or check?
Check
Erik Corry wrote:
The question is how much of a problem it really is. Are users
really that dumb?
The sad answer to this question has so far been a resounding "Yes" in
every scenario so far. :(
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
This has probably been covered somewhere, so for those who already know
this, forgive the reiteration.
If you are running Debian with Amavisd-new and Clamav, you will need to
upgrade (for example, apt-get install -t unstable amavisd-new) to the
newest version of amavisd-new (20030616p7-3 as of
Rembrandt wrote:
On 03 Mar 2004 07:55:00 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Spicer) wrote:
I don't angree couse a virus could also infect backups if the virus keep
itself secret.
And after 14 or 16 months it could destroy all data.
Don't say "Admins have to". They do their work but they can't fight wh
Rod Furey wrote:
I second this. The amount of mail I'm getting from the list has
gotten to the point where I want to use the web interface to look
at things (like I do with the Linux-390 list - lots of traffic there too).
And this is with me getting the digests... Ta muchly...
Rod
This was reaso
Jim Maul wrote:
my apologies, it was almost 5pm on a friday and for some reason i asked if
sendmail supports maildirs. musta been a brain fart cause obviously thats
not the mta's job. Feel free to point and laugh.
Thanks
Jim
Since we're sharing, I recently spent an hour trying to figure out why
Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Chris Meadors wrote:
International Center for Alcohol Policies? Now what exactly will the
new version of ClamAV be doing? :)
Hopefully it will work well enough that no one will have to modify their
drinking habits.
Maybe http://www.i-cap.org/home.
22 matches
Mail list logo
