On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Roger Koot wrote:
> and would like to upgrade to 0.65.
> but I'd like to know whether there are new issues and whether an upgrade
> wouldn't wreck my current setup.
I'm not useing mailscanner, but clamd itself has been much more stable for
me under 0.65 (Solaris 8 on Sparc, c
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> daemontools isn't "special", whatever that means, and bash shells are
'sepcial' is in a default installation. As in there is nothing called
daemontools on my Solaris 8 server.
There is however both sh and bash.
=
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> bash is not a part of the default solaris 8 server installation. neither is
> clamav, for that matter.
This is quickly getting off topic -- however a number of gnu type utils were
included in Solarius 8, and I am fairly sure /bin/bash was one of them
Even though it's been a few weeks, I wanted to follow up to my problem.
When upgrading to 0.84 I ran into a problem where one of my
machines would no longer send mail notifications to postmaster. This turned
out to be my own fault. I built the binary on a machine that had a link
for sendmail
May I add that it is really, really, really bad for clamav-milter to refuse
to run at all, just because it can't write to it's log file ?
I would much prefer it doing something and not logging then takeing down the
whole mail system.
==
C
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Clam runs fine when properly configured.
And it ran fine for me right up intil 0.85.
> Are you asking the developers to
> compensate for sloppy administration? I think for that you need a
No, what I'm asking for is if it runs one day with certain p
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Sergey wrote:
> i've just noticed the same thing. clamd.log is made by root. but 0.84
> doesn't care about that it works properly.
Yes -- this is what I posted about Sat morning.
Previous to 0.85, clamav-milter didn't care if it couldn't write to it's log
file.
Starting wi
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Sergey wrote:
> >> -rw-r- 1 rootclamav 1265 May 17 15:40 clamd.log
> AZ> ^^
> i've no idea, but 0.84 does.
To be more helpfull -- 0.84 can't write to it either, it just ran anyway.
Make sure whatever script you use the cycles log fil
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> You will have solved the problem only if you put this procedure in your
> startup scripts and any tools that rotate your logs.
Gee, I wish I had already posted that -- oh wait, I did.
==
Chris
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> What do you think the PTR for a host with 500 virtual domains might look
> like?
It doesn't matter -- as long as it points to some name that points back to
the same IP. mail723.theprovidersdomain.com would work.
===
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Eric J. Wisti wrote:
> How are others with Solaris handling the socket?
I put my socket in /var/clamav instead of /var/run
[Libby]:/var$ ls -ld clamav/
drwxrwsr-x2 clamav clamav512 May 17 11:06 clamav/
Both the clamd and clamav-milter sockets are there, along
On Tue, 24 May 2005, N Fung wrote:
> I'm experiencing this too (clamav-milter 0.85.1 without
> clamd) with log entries like these:
Try with clamd and use the --external option to clamav-milter.
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (9
I've been trying out the 20050524 devel snapshot on one of my servers since
the post regarding the buffer overrun problem. System is Solaris 8 on
UltraSparc, gcc 3.4.0
The 20050524 clamd is now dieing on database reloads. (I just upgraded to
the 20050526 snap, same behavior)
Enableing debug w
On Tue, 31 May 2005, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I am just wondering why clamscan rightly detects the trojan in the mail
> while clamdscan doesn't.
Check the output of clamscan -V and clamdscan -V -- make sure they report
the same database version number.
==
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Kelly Corbin wrote:
> What's the simplest setup to add ClamAV scanning to procmail? I'd like to add
Here is a recipie I haevn't used in over a year, you'll at least have to
remove the --mbox option and see what else is current, but this is the
general idea.
#Replace with
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Ronny Nussbaum wrote:
> In the documentation, it says that clamd accepts commands such as PING,
> VERSION, etc.
> Every time I start clamd, it just starts the daemon in the background.
> If I do "clamd PING", I get a daemon namedclamd PING.
You send these commands to th
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Ronny Nussbaum wrote:
> Thanks, but I was wondering if there's an easier way to communicate with the
> already-running process.
> I'm looking for something that I could do from a shell prompt rather than a
> script.
Change the program to send whatever command you give it on
It appears the last round of mails sent by Mytob.dj (or a close variant) are
not being detected in the current sigs (921). I'm going by the description
here:
http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As of last night I only had bounces for samples, and submitted
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> You desperately need a newer version. Many zip files will crash that
> one. A new version was released yesterday that fixed another crash.
www.zlib.net is still showing 1.2.2 from Oct 3 2004 as the latest version.
Where is the version that was rel
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Trog wrote:
> http://www.gzip.org/
Thanks, but http://www.gzip.org/zlib/ is also showing 1.2.2 from 10/3/2004
as the current version.
(www.zlib.net is listed here as the US mirror for www.gzip.org/zlib/ )
-Chris
==
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Trog wrote:
> What I wrote and what you wrote are different, hence different results.
You are correct. You wrote:
> http://www.gzip.org/
However, The last modified date of the www.gzip.org page is July 27, 2003.
There is no mention of a new version 'yesterday' (July 6 2005)
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, jef moskot wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> > www.zlib.net is still showing 1.2.2 from Oct 3 2004 as the latest version.
> > Where is the version that was released yesterday ?
>
> It affects FreeBSD 5.4 and 5.4, so if you ha
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Roger Rustad wrote:
> I'm worried about all of these Exchange users, though. How do I make sure
> that they can connect anywhere (cafe, cable modem, etc) and still make sure
> that spammers don't send crap to exchange.domain.com?
The same way everyone else does, use the auth
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:
> I am currently looking at doing the same thing. I have a set of boxes
> that I am planning to 'infect' with spyware and then start making
> signatures for them. It is a rather slow process at the moment..
There doesn't seem to be any reason a separ
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Chris said:
> Can ClamAV be configured (I guess thats the right word) to tag fraud type
> messages the same as it does with phishing messages? For instance this:
Spam Assassin does a very good job of picking these up. I find the
combination of ClamAV and Spam Assassin very e
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Chris wrote:
> That it does. I just didn't know if this was something that ClamAV could
> also
> tag as it does phishing or not.
To almost contradict my earlier answer -- Clam DOES find phish mails, they
have been adding signatures for a wihle. However, what it does fi
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, Damian Menscher wrote:
> > No it does not. Retract that statement immediately.
>
> Oh, sorry. That's what it says in my (patched) version. The released
> version may say something different.
Personally I like your version better. If the option can't be removed, you
should
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> JamesDR said:
> system runbook (everyone has runbooks, right?). It is very important that
> upgrades be done on a clean system and that the running processes be
> stopped before beginning the upgrade. My practice is to keep the freshclam
> and clamd c
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> I consider all obsolete libraries to be debris and get rid of them. They
> have no value and I don't need to waste tape space backing them up.
Unless you have binaries built against the older versions that will suddenly
start to fail when you delete
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Great. You're happy, I'm happy. And along the way the question from the OP
> as to how to remove an old install got answered. And the dev team can
> remove all that krufty "make uninstall" support code as it's just not
> needed. And those man pages for
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> If you cannot reject it before the final .crlfcrlf then you keep it. It's
> dead. Pinin' for the fjords, bleeding demised, an ex-message, shuffled off
> it's mortal coil, lovely plumage and all.
I will submit one other possibility: I use --postmaster-o
On Fri, 6 Jan 2006, Brian McDonald wrote:
> Chris this sounds like an excellent solution can you share how you did this?
Calling it a hack is an insult to hacks. :-) I'll try to take some time and
make a version I can put out (remove our IP addresses, SQL passwords, etc)
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Payal Rathod wrote:
> Me and many friends here are troubled by a new virus which has
> attachments like Video_part.mim, Attachment.hqx etc. We are getting this
> since last 36 hours and a friend submitted a few samples to clamav
Make sure your virus sigs are up to date. If
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Payal Rathod wrote:
> daily.cvd is up to date (version: 1244, sigs: 840, f-level: 6, builder:
> sven)
FYI, I have three instances of WORM.VB-8 in my logs from yesterday, so even
1244 detects a non-zero number of these. Evidently just not the one you have
==
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> Thomas Hochstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > "Worm.VB-8" is ClamAV's name for [EMAIL PROTECTED], according to the
> > advisories I read.
> I believe that, that definition was only added on the 18th. On 2/16 and
Not true. The first VB-8 I have logged is f
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Bill Maidment wrote:
> > Not true. The first VB-8 I have logged is from 11:53 EST on Jan 17 .
> That all depends on your time zone. EST in Australia may be different to EST
> somewhere else. Let's not get into a fight over this.
I mean GMT-0500 . I wasn't aware there were a
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The company I work for has implemented a firewall that only allows certain
> activity through it. I have requested that the user agent string
> "clamav/*" be allowed to communicate with the internet. The request has
> been refused because of secu
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Diego d'Ambra wrote:
> I'm investigating this.
>
> I believe that signature small-1004 is matching some sort of PE
> packer/obfuscater and must be updated to avoid detecting unrelated malware.
Personally, I'm not as interested in naming the viruses as much as blocking
them.
I'm running into issues where (so far as I can tell) .ppt files can take a
long time to scan. As an exmaple, I have a 2.8 meg 5 slide .ppt file that
takes 90 seconds to scan on an otherwise-quiet 1.5ghz Athlon.
For camparison, a random 3 meg .pdf file scanned in under a second.
Is this normal
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, des wrote:
> "Your disk is slow" or "don't scan large files" is a common response.
Well, I'm using ramdisk for temp so I don't think that's it.
> If you can provide a sample file to Trog to help find out what the
> real issue is that would be great.
Sent, hopefuly it helps.
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, John Hinton wrote:
> > ERROR: Problem with internal logger.
> I love answering my own post... I found the problem. Freshclam must have
> bombed due to the dying server. It left a truncated log at the end of the log
> file. I forced a rotate of the freshclam and clamav logs an
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Steve Basford wrote:
> Could anyone come up with some good wget/curl scripts, with wget, I guess it's
> using the -N option to only download changes and only download hourly (eg.
> 15:00, 16:00, 17:15, 18:15) etc.
I use the following bit of perl. If you have access to your o
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Steve Basford wrote:
> a) phish.ndb.gz
Definately.
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of Westchester
http://www.westnet.com/
_
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Steve Basford wrote:
> The file you need is: http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/phish.ndb.gz
I've atached my updated Perl script. It will now check the compressed
archive, and if it is updated download and upcompress it.
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Bob Hutchinson wrote:
> On Monday 24 Apr 2006 22:35, Steve Basford wrote:
> using the --stdout method results in a new timestamp. For me that is
> confounding.
Yes. Unfortunately I didn't see any other way to keep the original .gz file
intact. The LWP mirror library needs
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Bob Hutchinson wrote:
> The trouble with perl system() calls is that you don't get any result
> codes, I might experiment with backticks instead.
Someone suggested touch, here's the simple way:
if ($result == 200) {
system "gunzip -v --stdout $file > $dbfile";
my ($dev,
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> > If you know a gunzip option that will NOT delete the compresed file,
> > that would be the prefered method.
>
> cat file.gz | gunzip > file
That's not a gunzip option -- that's (almost) exactly what I'm doing in the
program that I'm looking for an al
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > That's not a gunzip option -- that's (almost) exactly what I'm doing in the
> > program that I'm looking for an alternative for.
>
> gunzip -c file.gz > file
Yes, THAT is EXACTLY what I'm doing that we are (were) looking for an
alternative for. :-
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Chris wrote:
> phish.ndb.gz500
>
> as a guess does this mean there was no new file to download?
A 500 status code is an internal server error. Nothing to do with the
script.
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Chris wrote:
> "A 500 status code is an internal server error. Nothing to do with the
> script."
"99% of all problems under Unix are permissions"
Aside from it being under cron, what else is different. UserID, evnironment,
shell, PWD, etc ?
==
On Tue, 2 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Robert Isaac wrote:
> > The libclamav.so.1 files are 777
>
> Danger, Will Robinson!
Probably not. It's a symbolic link. Those are always mode 777 .
Actually what lrwxrwxrwx comes out as numericly
===
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Daniel T. Staal wrote:
> These days, being out of the office, or town, or country, is no reason for
> you to not be able to get your email, if you felt you needed to. So, the
> only reason you aren't responding is that you don't want to.
I would say the problem is people exp
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
> That's where you're both wrong. It's an extension to instant messaging. Why
Really ? That's amazing, that email managed to be invented at least a decade
before IM and still extended it.
> It's an EXCHANGE based world, people! C'mon and catch up
On Wed, 17 May 2006, Luis Vargas wrote:
> how do I unsuscribe from this list? I got another account registered in this
Read the URL on the bottom of every message.
> http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
==
Chris Candreva --
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006, Obantec Support wrote:
> I have just started seeing this error and have been running clamav for 6 or
> more months.
> i did upgrade to 88.2 recently and i now see
>
> ERROR: Problem with internal logger.
Means another copy of freshclam was already running.
=
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, Nigel Horne wrote:
> 0.88.3 is a bug fix of 0.88.2, 0.88.2 is a bug fix of
> 0.88.1, 0.88.1 is a bug fix of 0.88. 0.88, as I said is very
> old. True some bug fixes are major, but my point stands whether you
> wish to argue about it or not - I should know I wrote the stuff
> th
Since the repeated advice has been to run CVS, I'm going to repeat the
question - is there a recomended snapshot date that is more likely to run
than others ?
Would it be possible to pick a good date and publish a beta ? Something that
may have problems, but at least is known to compile and ru
On Fri, 8 Sep 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Seems not to work in Solaris.
As a Solaris fan -- you REALLY want to install gnu find, and grep, and
fileutils. At least.
Sun still for whatever reason doesn't support many newer options, newer
being post 1989.
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Aleksey Luzin wrote:
>
> # freshclam
> ERROR: Problem with internal logger.
>
> What does it mean? and how I can fix it?
It means there is another instance of freshclam running. If it's still
running, kill it.
==
Chr
I have a sample of W97M.Lafool.U caught by 0.88.5 that 0.90rc1.1 says is
clean. I also received an almost identical mail that both say is clean.
The second I've submitted as a new virus sample. The first isn't taken,
since the web form's 0.88.5 catches it.
I assumed I had missed a config opt
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> I have a sample of W97M.Lafool.U caught by 0.88.5 that 0.90rc1.1 says is
> clean. I also received an almost identical mail that both say is clean.
Looks like this may be a word/unpacker problem on Solaris/Sparc, as it is
properly de
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 05:53:30AM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
> Anyway, we send out several times a week flyers to our customers. These
> mailings range from 750 to 2000 messages per run. To scan 2000 identical
> messages is insane, not to mention a total waste of system resources.
> Other tha
I don't know if this helps anyone else, but on Solaris 8 I had to tell
configure explicily to use bash instead of stock sun /bin/sh . It was
generating an error on the check for the clamav user (looked like it was
trying to run a program called clamav:: )
==
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Please report the problem to http://bugs.clamav.net
Opened. Sorry, I just assumed it was Sun's problem.
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet Internet Services of Westche
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Jim Redman wrote:
> Your opinions, seem to be the prevalent attitude of the vocal members of this
> list - if you don't suffer, it wasn't worth it.
I would disagree, in that I don't see it as suffering.
Forgive me if I missed it, but what is your specific problem ? Perhaps we
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Daniel J McDonald wrote:
> > > My observation is that of all the modern packages ClamAV fails to
> > > install and run successfully and securely without operator
> > > intervention. I think that this should be refined to reference
> > > Fedora packages and perhaps not al
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, zamri wrote:
> I use clamav 0.90rc2 and my friend uses clamav 0.88.5 (the latest
> stable). Just now, after I ran freshclam, i run clamdscan for a worm.
> His could detect it as worm and mine didn't. Why is that?
It would be helpful to state what platform and what worm.
IE,
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Ken Jones wrote:
> > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89
> Access Denied
> You are not authorized to access bug #89.
I think the clam Bugzilla require you to have an account and be logged in to
watch bugs.
=
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Ken Jones wrote:
> I do have an account I even have open reported bugs that I am working on
> with the developers :) (ok, I've reported and they are trying to fix)
Look man, I just use the bugzulla. I don't want to have to understand
how it works.
< Ducks for cover . .
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> He scores!
"Thank you, I'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitresses."
> I get the same login error, btw, and since I use Solaris exclusively, I'm
> interested.
Look like it's been clasified as a security bug, so I'll let the devel
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, zamri wrote:
> I assume the answer is yes. :)
No, it probably means you didn't provide any of the information that was
asked for -- what it found, your platform and OS, etc.
Your premise that rc.2 isn't "updated" is wrong. There may be a language
barrier causing this, but
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Jonathan Armitage wrote:
> I have just tried to configure, make and install Clamav-0.9RC2 on a Dell PC
> running Solaris 10. I have previously done the same with various 0.8 versions
I don't know if this is your issue, but if you have bash installed, try
editing the first li
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Has anyone else observed such large improvements?
Yes. 0.8.x boggs down on some MIME types. The 0.9x RC's have been much
faster.
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816
WestNet I
Is there a compelling reason for clam to die on a malformed database,
instead of just ignoring the bad line and continuing with all the other
sigs ?
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 948-3162
WestNet Internet Services of We
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Sander Holthaus wrote:
> A malformed database points to:
>
> - - serious system malfunction
> - - security breach
> - - security breach / system malfunction between you and (or at) the
> database provider
In my experience, it means a database maintainer who made a simple m
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Bill Landry wrote:
> The MSRBL-Images.hdb database started showing up corrupted yesterday and
This is not the only reason I ask, but the most recent. I have a script that
checks that evidenly has a bug. I can either spend time fixing that, or
fixing clam so it ignores the
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Freshclam provides this and much more.
Except the ability to operate from a given specific URL pointing to a file.
If the only updates come from freshclam-verified sources it wouldn't be so
bad. The problem comes up that other mechanisims are necessry f
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> There's no limitation for choosing a URL - you can put anything you like in
> the freshclam.conf file. Using the --config-file=FILE option of freshclam in
The only option I see in man freshclam.conf is for a database mirror
server name, not a URL.
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Luca Gibelli wrote:
> > How exactly is this better then a possibe false-positive, if a corrupted
> > sig
> > happens to match some valid piece of mail ?
>
> It's better to delay N emails rather than delete N emails.
A false-positive won't delete the mail - it will cause an
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Sander Holthaus wrote:
> a very basic perl script which opens a listening socket and a shell? I
> found it after a hacker tried to gain entry. The script is nothing
> special (far from, 612 bytes) but I doubt people are actually using it
> for any legitimate means. BitDefender
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Todd Lyons wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hey, who's the guy who maintains the phishing sigs? They hacked my
http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> I don't want to discuss about performance in general, I would just like to
> know if this is "normal" and/or if there is a way to tune up that process.
>
> I use 0.88.7
Yes, it is normal for 0.88.x
The 0.90rc2 release has greatly improved performan
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > The 0.90rc2 release has greatly improved performance.
>
> OK. Could you define "greatly improved"? I'm quite happy with clamav but I use
> postfix/amavis with pre-queueing and therefore... :)
It's been a while, but things that took minutes to scan
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Arnaud Jacques wrote:
> Yeah, we all waiting for this new stable release :)
I've been running 0.90rc2 here for a few months. IMHO it is more stable than
the 0.88.x I was running previously.
Just yeaterday I received a Bugzilla note from one I had submitted that it
was fixed
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> 50-50 isn't bad. Can you share your configure params?
Compiled fine on Solaris 8 Sparc, gcc 4.1.1, binutils 2.17
I configure with just ./configure --enable-milter
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PR
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> What breaks? I agree that at first glance it seems like an unnecessary
> include, but I'm curious what error you get.
Here are the errors I get building rc3 with --enable-experimental
gcc 4.1.1 binutils 2.17
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I./u
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> In my case the only difference from every previous build was to enable
> experimental. I have just one build script I've used for years.
Try without experimental.
I have a similar set-up (Sun Sparc Ultra 2s, Solaris 8, gcc 4.1.1)
I was running 0.90
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Steve Holdoway wrote:
> Have you patched 8.14.0. I had everything falling over until I did that...
FWIW the problems I had were with 8.13.8
==
Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 948-3162
WestNet Internet Ser
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> What would be the point of having a socket ready before clamd is ready
> to do any work? Maybe I'm missing something.
It would be something for other programs to connect to and wait for a
response, instead of generating a "socket does not exist" error.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > It would be something for other programs to connect to and wait for a
> > response, instead of generating a "socket does not exist" error.
>
> So that they could potentially wait around until their internal timeout,
> instead of immediately returning?
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > It makes a great deal of sense to move the files into the clam DB directory
> > to insure an atomic operation. If clamd/clamav-milter should happen to
> > reload with a half-copied file in the DB dir, it will likely stop running.
>
> Yah - I realize
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, CPTeam Hostmaster wrote:
> I get this in maillog whenever I start clamav-milter:
>
> --
> Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milter (clmilter): local
> socket name /var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock unsafe
> Mar 8 00:45:01 ns1 sendmail[7399]: l27Mj1nM007399: Milte
201 - 292 of 292 matches
Mail list logo
