At 11:57 AM 3/14/04, you wrote:
>It looks like you get the proper IP of the offending machine firing off
>these worms in the header (even though everything else is forged).
>
>Is there any point in telling [EMAIL PROTECTED] that one of their DSL
>customers is spamming the Internet with noxious mess
At 02:56 PM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
On Thursday 25 March 2004 10:36 pm, Mark Novak wrote:
> > If running the same command on your server does not show the
> > SomeFool.P then
> > your definitions are NOT up to date. If freshclam insists on saying
> > they
> > are up to date, i would try deleting th
At 05:24 PM 3/25/04, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>>
>> I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
>> now wants
>> to update viruses.db, but the checksum fails after the downl
At 07:09 PM 3/25/04, you wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 18:39:29 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> At 05:24 PM 3/25/04, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>> >On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm updating from clamav.
At 01:11 PM 3/26/2004, you wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 21:42:57 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>
> I just ran freshclam again and instead of downloading viruses.db and
> then giving me a checksum error it now claims:
>
> Connected to clamav.elektrapro.com.
> Reading md
stable since then, but tonight it failed again.
Any suggestions on how to narrow down the problem? Can a debug log be turned on
to get a better idea where it's failing, or can I force a core file somehow when
it's sitting in that half defunct state?
--
At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:17, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
>> once a day I find the following:
>
>
>I had the exact same problems myself, with RH 8.0 and Sendmail, u
At 11:21 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
>Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>>At 11:17 PM 9/2/03, you wrote:
>>
>>>On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 01:17, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm on a Mandrake 9.1 system using clamav-milter with sendmail and about
>>>>o
At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming
mail might be
> an option for an individual user, but an ISP would probably want an
option to
> simply let the
At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking a
At 06:58 PM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 06:01:55PM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> At 10:09 AM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>> >On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 08:51:26AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >
>> >Xclamav, S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=, T
Looking over the clamd failures on my mail server I noticed that it
was always leaving behind a work directory in /tmp, which pretty much
narrows it down to the mbox.c code that pulls apart a mail message for
scanning. James Stevens had posted a message to the clamav-devel list
about replacing m
At 07:28 PM 9/3/03, you wrote:
>I'm using a modified version of:
>
> *SpamAssassin Milter version 0.5.5
> * For use with the SpamAssassin http://www.spamassassin.org/ ``spamd''
That's one of the ones I looked at, it's another SF project I believe
now. Their mailing list has as m
At 10:29 AM 9/5/03, you wrote:
>Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to have made a bit of difference.
>
>INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clmilter',`S=local:/var/run/clmilter.sock, F=,
>T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl
>define(`confINPUT_MAIL_FILTERS', `clmilter')
>
>Still no changes to clamd.log, and no headers added to incoming
At 11:11 AM 11/27/03, you wrote:
>Unfortunately not all our users are happy of the situation
>when they cannot get e-mails with viruses in them.
You've got to be kidding. Did the user take the hint when you had
trouble replying because you were laughing too hard?
---
At 01:10 PM 11/27/03, you wrote:
>Hello Brian,
>
>Thursday, November 27, 2003, 9:25:01 PM, you wrote:
>
>BWA> At 11:11 AM 11/27/03, you wrote:
>>>Unfortunately not all our users are happy of the situation
>>>when they cannot get e-mails with viruses in them.
>
>BWA> You've got to be kiddi
-mail, but still deliver it to addressee ?
>
>
>> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 12:25:01PM -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> > At 11:11 AM 11/27/03, you wrote:
>> > >Unfortunately not all our users are happy of the situation
>> > >when they cannot get e
At 11:29 PM 11/27/03, you wrote:
>Hello Brian,
>
>I hope you don´t laugh too much and think about the problems of filtering mails from
>time to time:
>
>67.106.13.26 does not like recipient.
>... Schicken Sie hat abgelehnt ab. Es war
>entweder werbe, dumm, oder nur Drgern.
>Giving up on 67.106.13.
18 matches
Mail list logo
