Jingo Administrator wrote:
Already more than a week ago I posted my first question to the list. I
must admit I'm a bit disappointed that nobody responds. Is it that I
asked a silly question? Or is the issue just to hard to solve and just
nobody wants to burn his fingers on it?
On 07/07/2015 10
On 08/07/15 17:33, Rafael Ferreira wrote:
> Well, the progress you see is likely to be transfer, not processing, time
> since that’s where most time is going to be spent for a sizable file anyways
> (under normal circumstances) so I doubt clamd is your main latency source
> here.
? I said clam
Apologies for cross posting. This question is about Exim and clamd.
Specifically, how can we deal with a clam daemon that’s unresponsive (for five
minutes) while updating rules. The obvious thing would be to wait a bit longer
rather than time out, but I can’t see a control for that. I have some
It seems to be the elephant in the room, but the root cause of your problem is
you have a resource-constrained system. You don't have enough RAM or CPU to do
what you want. I had the same problem with older Solaris systems running SPARC
processors and no amount of cleverness on my part helped.
On 7/7/2015 4:31 PM, Kris Deugau wrote:
Jingo Administrator wrote:
Already more than a week ago I posted my first question to the list. I
must admit I'm a bit disappointed that nobody responds. Is it that I
asked a silly question? Or is the issue just to hard to solve and just
nobody wants to bu
The system is a VIA PC3500G Motherboard with an onboard VIA Esther
processor 1500MHz. So, indeed, nothing special or heavy, I know,
although it's dedicated:-) . Scanning is not the bottleneck, reloading
the database is. Before this server I had a much slower system with a
VIA C3 processor and 512 M
On 7/8/2015 11:11 AM, Jingo Administrator wrote:
The system is a VIA PC3500G Motherboard with an onboard VIA Esther
processor 1500MHz. So, indeed, nothing special or heavy, I know,
although it's dedicated:-) . Scanning is not the bottleneck, reloading
the database is. Before this server I had a m
On 7/8/15 8:11 AM, Jingo Administrator wrote:
Scanning is not the bottleneck, reloading
the database is.
Because you're wrong about this you cannot correct the real problem. The
bottleneck is the platform. Nothing else.
dp
___
Help us build a compreh
Well, I agree my hardware isn't rather stunning and doesn't help to
(dramatically) reduce the time it takes for clamav to reload the
database. I will draw my conclusion and start to drop the 3rd party
sigs. But no matter how much I can narrow down the problem of the reload
time, and now I come back
You've redefined the real problem multiple times. Pick one and stay with it.
To properly diagnose *your* system it would be very helpful to see a SAR report
for CPU/Swap/Paging/Cache/Memory activity/IOWait before, during, and after a
signature refresh.
Running sar -A will provide coarse infor
Thanks for the suggestions.
1. Of course I can update less frequently, but the problem stays, it'll
only occur less frequent
2. I noticed that setting the update to one hour, in fact starts every
time about 5 minutes later, it shifts so to speak
3. Interesting idea, but on my system I think it woul
Thanks for the suggestion, I probably will. In the meantime responses of
people made me clear two things :
1. My system is too low budget to have an acceptable time period in
which clamav is unresponsive. My mail server is for personal use, it is
just a home server with a few mail accounts. But doe
On Wed, July 8, 2015 5:09 pm, Jingo Administrator wrote:
> Well, I agree my hardware isn't rather stunning and doesn't help to
> (dramatically) reduce the time it takes for clamav to reload the
> database. I will draw my conclusion and start to drop the 3rd party sigs.
What signatures (3rd Party
I have a personal mail server at home too. It runs clamav with the base
sigs and spamassassin. It is a small atom-based server and takes about
1 minute to reload the base sigs. I've never noticed any problems
related to the reload time. In fact, I wasn't even aware that it was
taking that l
I have the clamav-unofficial-sigs-3.7.2 package installed and 4
signature libraries of SecuriteInfo.com
Here's the output of 'ls -l' of my /var/lib/clamav directory:
total 311024
-rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav78152 Jul 8 20:55 blurl.ndb
-rw-r--r-- 1 clamav clamav 6058730 Jul 8 20:50 bofhland_cra
1)How frequently will antivirus get updated?
2) Frequency of antivirus license updation.
3)What needs to be done if we need every day AV updation?
BR
Iranna
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http:/
16 matches
Mail list logo