Well, I agree my hardware isn't rather stunning and doesn't help to (dramatically) reduce the time it takes for clamav to reload the database. I will draw my conclusion and start to drop the 3rd party sigs. But no matter how much I can narrow down the problem of the reload time, and now I come back to my original point, on every system there will be a (short) period of time that clamav isn't responsive and therefor causes problems to other services making use of the clamav service. Imho that's the real problem.
On 07/08/2015 05:54 PM, Dennis Peterson wrote: > On 7/8/15 8:11 AM, Jingo Administrator wrote: >> Scanning is not the bottleneck, reloading >> the database is. > Because you're wrong about this you cannot correct the real problem. > The bottleneck is the platform. Nothing else. > > dp > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: > https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq > > http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml --- e-mail sent by Private Lotus using Exim --- ------------ virus scan by ClamAV ------------- _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
