I'm running postfix and amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav. I have all
the daemons running and mail is getting
filtered through amavisd-new (as per the header), I'm trying to get
spammassassin and clamav configured with
postfix. I don't know if my mail is being filtered. Could someone point
me i
Goodman, William wrote:
> I'm running postfix and amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav. I have all
> the daemons running and mail is getting
> filtered through amavisd-new (as per the header), I'm trying to get
> spammassassin and clamav configured with
> postfix. I don't know if my mail is being
Folks,
0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09.
For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog.
A what's new document that gives an overview of the new and improved
features is currently in preparation for publication on www.clamav.net.
For technical information please refer
On February 27, 2009 8:32 am Goodman, William wrote:
> I'm running postfix and amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav. I have all
> the daemons running and mail is getting
> filtered through amavisd-new (as per the header), I'm trying to get
> spammassassin and clamav configured with
> postfix. I don
Freddie Cash wrote:
> On February 27, 2009 8:32 am Goodman, William wrote:
> > I'm running postfix and amavisd-new, spamassassin and clamav. I
> > have all the daemons running and mail is getting
> > filtered through amavisd-new (as per the header), I'm trying to get
> > spammassassin and clamav co
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09.
>
> It would help us a lot to see if this problem still exists in the new
> ewlease if as many people as possible were to test this release
> candidate by downloading it from www.clamav.net. If you have a test
> machine/
On Feb 27, 2009, at 9:32 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> So long as Postfix can send mail to amavisd-new, and amavisd-new can
>> send the mail back to Postfix, then all you have to do is make sure
>> amavisd-new is configured to correctly use SA and Clam.
>
> Also, since amavisd-new incorporates SpamAss
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09.
>
> For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog.
>
> A what's new document that gives an overview of the new and improved
> features is currently in preparation for publication on www.clamav.net.
>
>
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 15:36 -0500, James Kosin wrote:
> Nigel Horne wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09.
> >
> Nigel,
>
> Compiles and links in FC1. I know it is old; but, nothing is broken in
> the compiling.
Just finished altering the mandriva spec file so i
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:48 -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 15:36 -0500, James Kosin wrote:
> > Nigel Horne wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09.
> > >
> > Nigel,
> >
> > Compiles and links in FC1. I know it is old; but, nothing is brok
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> 0.95 RC1 was published on Wednesday 25/2/09.
>
> For details of the new features please refer to the Changelog.
>
> A what's new document that gives an overview of the new and improved
> features is currently in preparation for publication on www.clamav.net.
>
>
Bill Landry wrote:
Nigel,
>
> ClamAV 0.95rc1 compiles and installs fine on Fedora 10. However, the
> "clamscan -d" test now appears to be more restrictive in what it finds
> and reports as "malformed".
Hi Bill,
Thanks very much for trying this for us.
>
> I have created a file of what was no
Bill Landry wrote:
> Just to update this thread, RC1 compiles and installs without
> error/issue on Fedora 10. The one thing I have noticed is that when I
> stop the clamd service now (service clamd stop), I see the following in
> the clamd.log:
>
>WARNING: Syncpipe write failed
>
> Here ar
On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the
> requirements?
>
> Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file
> not found - unrar support unavailable
>
This is clamav's libclamunrar. If you've built witho
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:08:11 -0500
Nigel Horne wrote:
> If you don't have access to a
> test machine you can still help us by downloading it and checking that
> it compiles and links on your platform.
I successfully built RPMs in the usual way on my rather old Redhat 9
system.
--
Brian Morr
Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote:
>> This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the
>> requirements?
>>
>> Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file
>> not found - unrar support unavailable
>>
>
> This is clamav's libc
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 23:34 +0200, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2009-02-27 22:58, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> > This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the
> > requirements?
> >
> > Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file
> > not found - unrar support unav
There is no stdinit.h in my system so clamdtop failed. I disabled the #include
in the clamdtop.c code and it built and linked. Not sure what it might fail to
do later.
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 3.3.2
It built fine in RedHat Linux 2.6.9-67.0.15.EL, 32-bit Intel.
dp
_
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> There is no stdinit.h in my system so clamdtop failed. I disabled the
> #include
> in the clamdtop.c code and it built and linked. Not sure what it might fail
> to
> do later.
>
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.3.2
>
> It built fine in RedHat Linux 2.6.9-67.0.15.EL, 32
You can use inttypes.h instead, but you'd do well to just upgrade to
Solaris 10 as there are MANY good reasons to do so.
Look up ZFS.
Gary L. Burnore
gburn...@databasix.com
> -Original Message-
> From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net
> [mailto:clamav-users-boun...@lists.clam
Gary L Burnore wrote:
> You can use inttypes.h instead, but you'd do well to just upgrade to
> Solaris 10 as there are MANY good reasons to do so.
>
> Look up ZFS.
>
>
> Gary L. Burnore
> gburn...@databasix.com
>
There are not enough reasons to do so - it's a very big job to drag a lot of
u
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Regarding stdint.h, I'm surprised the code linked without it. I can't expect
> this to be the only surprise.
>
stdint.h and other includes like stdio.h, unistd.h all define things
found in the standard C library. GCC always links your program against
the standard C li
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 14:58 -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> This is new. Is there another library that has been added to the
> requirements?
>
> Starting Clam AntiVirus Daemon: LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen: file
> not found - unrar support unavailable
>
Dan, nothing to do actually with the su
23 matches
Mail list logo
