[Clamav-users] ClamAV scan report

2008-08-19 Thread Veselin Kantsev
Hello, A question about the scan output of ClamAV. I have a script that finds files that have been modified in the last N days from a folder and then passes the list to clamscan. I'm using "cat LIST.txt | xargs -0 clamscan -ir --stdout >> REPORT.txt" When the scan is finished the report looks li

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV scan report

2008-08-19 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Veselin Kantsev schrieb: I have a script that finds files that have been modified in the last N days from a folder and then passes the list to clamscan. I'm using "cat LIST.txt | xargs -0 clamscan -ir --stdout >> REPORT.txt" When the scan is finished the report looks like this: --- SCA

Re: [Clamav-users] simplest replacement for ancient amavis-perl

2008-08-19 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Steve Wray schrieb: Tilman Schmidt wrote: [...] So dropping mail into the bitbucket is not an alternative. I have to either reject it or deliver it. Wow. So... the default, unpatched build of qmail is quite popular in Germany? I won't enter that minefield. :-) But unpatched qmail is certa

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 Brian Morrison wrote: > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:59:29 +0100 G.W. Haywood wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Luca Gibelli wrote: > > > > > ... release candidate for 0.94. > > > > I started to download it, but when I saw that it was going to be just > > under 20 megabyte

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread Bill Maidment
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:51:37 +0100 (BST), G.W. Haywood wrote > Hi there, > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 Brian Morrison wrote: > > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:59:29 +0100 G.W. Haywood wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Luca Gibelli wrote: > > > > > > > ... release candidate for 0.94. > > > > > > I starte

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread Bowie Bailey
Bill Maidment wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:51:37 +0100 (BST), G.W. Haywood wrote > > > > My point was that it's ten times as big as it should be and > > apparently it's growing without bound. This is because it contains > > a database, which is of course probably a useless copy of the one > >

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV scan report

2008-08-19 Thread Brandon Perry
why not just use the --log argument? On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Tilman Schmidt < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Veselin Kantsev schrieb: > >> I have a script that finds files that have been modified in the last >> N days from a folder and then passes the list to clamscan. >> >> I'm using "cat

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV scan report

2008-08-19 Thread Veselin Kantsev
Thanks you Tilman. >From what I understand, xargs passes the command line arguments in batches, launching clamscan once for each batch. Veselin On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:41:18AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Veselin Kantsev schrieb: >> I have a script that finds files that have been modifie

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread Jan Pieter Cornet
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:51:37PM +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote: > > > I started to download it, but when I saw that it was going to be just > > > under 20 megabytes I cancelled it. > > > > Well it's not *that* big! > > My point was that it's ten times as big as it should be and apparently > it's gro

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread reiner otto
--- Jan Pieter Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb am Di, 19.8.2008: Von: Jan Pieter Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Betreff: Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1 An: "ClamAV users ML" Datum: Dienstag, 19. August 2008, 17:24 On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 01:51:37PM +0100, G.W. Haywood wrote: > > >

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread sydz
gcc 4.0.1 caused configuration failure with PR bug 28045 Bypassed with CFLAGS='O0' and installed successfully on Macintosh PowerPC G4 (10.4.11). make check returned no errors. freshclam log showed the following entries: Database updated (397476 signatures) from database.clamav.net (IP: 193.

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread Török Edwin
On 2008-08-19 21:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > gcc 4.0.1 caused configuration failure with PR bug 28045 > > Bypassed with CFLAGS='O0' and installed successfully on Macintosh > PowerPC G4 (10.4.11). > Another "workaround" is to use llvm-gcc as described in the FAQ, and you don't have to disa

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread Dennis Peterson
G.W. Haywood wrote: > Hi there, > > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 Brian Morrison wrote: > >> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 10:59:29 +0100 G.W. Haywood wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Luca Gibelli wrote: >>> ... release candidate for 0.94. >>> I started to download it, but when I saw that it was going to be j

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > My point was that it's ten times as big as it should be > > Which begs the question: How big should it be, and why is that size > better than the one it is? > Size matters not! -- Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrums) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Char

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd
> Bandwidth costs money. How big will the database have to grow before > the ClamAV team starts to take notice? Fifty megabytes? A hundred? Americans don't understand this dilemma. To them traffic is free because it's all national. International traffic costs money but that only affects count

Re: [Clamav-users] announcing ClamAV 0.94rc1

2008-08-19 Thread Jim Preston
Built with no problems on FC6 Jim ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml